Wada Kanae, Ikeda Eri, Wada Junichiro, Inoue Go, Miyasaka Munenaga, Miyashin Michiyo
Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Dent Mater J. 2016;35(4):585-93. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-149.
Although the demand for aesthetic restoration of primary molars has increased, the full-crown restorations using resin and the details of the wear characteristics of trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TMPT) filler containing resins for primary molars are not well understood. This study was conducted to determine whether new light-cured composite resin (Fantasista) and 4-META/MMATBB resin (Bondfill SB) are appropriate for full crown restoration of primary molars by evaluating their wear characteristics. Both resins products contain TMPT filler. The properties of the resins were evaluated through in vitro impacting-sliding wear tests; the wear properties of the opposing enamel specimens used in the tests were also studied. The properties of the resins were compared with those of Litefill, MetafilC, and Clearfil FII, which had been evaluated previously. Fantasista exhibited simple shape of wear that was suggestive of a higher wear resistance than that of Litefill. Fantasista caused the least damage to the antagonistic primary enamel.
尽管对乳磨牙美学修复的需求有所增加,但使用树脂进行全冠修复以及含三羟甲基丙烷三甲基丙烯酸酯(TMPT)填料的树脂用于乳磨牙的磨损特性细节尚未得到充分了解。本研究旨在通过评估新型光固化复合树脂(Fantasista)和4-META/MMATBB树脂(Bondfill SB)的磨损特性,确定它们是否适用于乳磨牙的全冠修复。两种树脂产品均含有TMPT填料。通过体外冲击滑动磨损试验评估树脂的性能;同时研究试验中使用的对颌釉质标本的磨损特性。将这些树脂的性能与先前已评估过的Litefill、MetafilC和Clearfil FII的性能进行比较。Fantasista呈现出简单的磨损形状,表明其耐磨性高于Litefill。Fantasista对对颌乳磨牙釉质造成的损害最小。