• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体验中的意义基础:具身语言的广阔视角

Grounding meaning in experience: A broad perspective on embodied language.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Viale Salvatore Venuta, 88100, Germaneto, Italy.

Faculty of Philosophy, Pontifical University Antonianum, Via Merulana 124/B, 00185, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.033. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.033
PMID:27477443
Abstract

This work reviews key behavioural, neurophysiological and neuroimaging data on the neural substrates for processing the meaning of linguistic material, and tries to articulate the picture emerging from those findings with the notion of meaning coming from specific approaches in philosophy of language (the "internalist" view) and linguistics (words point at experiential clusters). The reviewed findings provide evidence in favour of a causal role of brain neural structures responsible for sensory, motor and even emotional experiences in attributing meaning to words expressing those experiences and, consequently, lend substantial support to an embodied and "internalist" conception of linguistic meaning. Key evidence concern verbs, nouns and adjectives with a concrete content, but the challenge that abstract domains pose to the embodied approach to language is also discussed. This work finally suggests that the most fundamental role of embodiment might be that of establishing commonalities among individual experiences of different members of a linguistic community, and that those experiences ground shared linguistic meanings.

摘要

本文综述了关于语言材料意义处理的行为、神经生理学和神经影像学的关键数据,并尝试将这些发现与语言哲学(“内在主义”观点)和语言学(词语指向体验聚类)中意义的概念联系起来。综述结果为负责感觉、运动甚至情感体验的大脑神经结构在赋予表达这些体验的词语以意义方面的因果作用提供了证据,从而为语言的具身化和“内在主义”概念提供了实质性支持。关键证据涉及具有具体内容的动词、名词和形容词,但也讨论了抽象领域对语言具身方法的挑战。这项工作最终表明,具身化的最基本作用可能是在语言社区的不同成员的个人体验之间建立共性,而这些体验则构成了共同的语言意义。

相似文献

1
Grounding meaning in experience: A broad perspective on embodied language.体验中的意义基础:具身语言的广阔视角
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.033. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
The concreteness of abstract language: an ancient issue and a new perspective.抽象语言的具体性:一个古老的问题和一个新的视角。
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 May;224(4):1385-1401. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01851-7. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
3
Embodied experience and linguistic meaning.具身经验与语言意义。
Brain Lang. 2003 Jan;84(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00517-5.
4
Embodiment and language.体现与语言。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):e1649. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1649. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
An Integrated Neural Decoder of Linguistic and Experiential Meaning.语言和体验意义的综合神经解码器。
J Neurosci. 2019 Nov 6;39(45):8969-8987. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2575-18.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts.言语即社会工具:语言、社会性与抽象概念的内在基础
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Jul;29:120-153. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
7
The Story So Far: How Embodied Cognition Advances Our Understanding of Meaning-Making.至此的故事:具身认知如何推动我们对意义建构的理解。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 31;8:1315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01315. eCollection 2017.
8
Raising the Roof: Situating Verbs in Symbolic and Embodied Language Processing.抬高屋顶:动词在象征和具身语言处理中的位置。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Apr;48(4):e13442. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13442.
9
Sensorimotor and linguistic information attenuate emotional word processing benefits: an eye-movement study.感觉运动和语言信息减弱情绪词加工的优势:一项眼动研究。
Emotion. 2013 Dec;13(6):1107-21. doi: 10.1037/a0032417. Epub 2013 May 6.
10
Abstract and concrete sentences, embodiment, and languages.抽象句和具体句、体现和语言。
Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 15;2:227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00227. eCollection 2011.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic Analysis of Patients' Labels During 3MDR Psychotherapy.3MDR心理治疗期间患者标签的语言分析
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Aug 11;35(Suppl 1):S29-S35. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2025.241024.
2
Newly acquired word-action associations trigger auditory cortex activation during movement preparation: Implications for Hebbian plasticity in action word learning.新习得的词 - 动作关联在运动准备过程中触发听觉皮层激活:对动作词学习中赫布可塑性的启示。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0325977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325977. eCollection 2025.
3
Processing L2 action verbs shares the same mechanisms for processing L1 items: evidence from a combined behavioral and MEG study.
处理第二语言动作动词与处理第一语言项目具有相同的机制:来自行为学和脑磁图联合研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1585897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1585897. eCollection 2025.
4
Improving lexico-semantic integration with gesture-enriched pictures: A word-learning study using the Picture-Word Interference paradigm.利用富含手势的图片改善词汇语义整合:一项使用图片-单词干扰范式的单词学习研究。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 17. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01701-4.
5
Children with autistic spectrum disorder can imagine actions- what can this reveal about the Broken Mirror Hypothesis?患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童能够想象动作——这对于镜像神经元假说有何启示?
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 23;16:1490445. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1490445. eCollection 2025.
6
Activity in Occipito-Temporal Cortex Is Involved in Tool-Use Planning and Contributes to Tool-Related Semantic Neural Representations.枕颞叶皮质的活动参与工具使用规划,并有助于与工具相关的语义神经表征。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Dec 3;5(4):1008-1024. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00159. eCollection 2024.
7
Cognitive approaches in the rehabilitation of upper limbs function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.认知方法在脑瘫儿童上肢功能康复中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Jun;60(3):445-457. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08288-1. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
8
Natural language instructions induce compositional generalization in networks of neurons.自然语言指令诱导神经元网络的组合泛化。
Nat Neurosci. 2024 May;27(5):988-999. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01607-5. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
9
Perception of robotic actions and the influence of gender.对机器人动作的感知及性别的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1295279. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295279. eCollection 2024.
10
Syntax matters in shaping sensorimotor activation driven by nouns.名词驱动的感觉运动激活中,句法很重要。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):285-301. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01460-0. Epub 2023 Sep 6.