Assi Ayman, Sauret Christophe, Massaad Abir, Bakouny Ziad, Pillet Hélène, Skalli Wafa, Ghanem Ismat
Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Saint-Joseph, Beirut, Lebanon; Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris, France; Gait Laboratory, SESOBEL, Beirut, Lebanon.
Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris, France.
Gait Posture. 2016 Jul;48:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
Localization of the hip joint center (HJC) is essential in computation of gait data. EOS low dose biplanar X-rays have been shown to be a good reference in evaluating various methods of HJC localization in adults. The aim is to evaluate predictive and functional techniques for HJC localization in typically developing (TD) and cerebral palsy (CP) children, using EOS as an image based reference. Eleven TD and 17 CP children underwent 3D gait analysis. Six HJC localization methods were evaluated in each group bilaterally: 3 predictive (Plug in Gait, Bell and Harrington) and 3 functional methods based on the star arc technique (symmetrical center of rotation estimate, center transformation technique and geometrical sphere fitting). All children then underwent EOS low dose biplanar radiographs. Pelvis, lower limbs and their corresponding external markers were reconstructed in 3D. The center of the femoral head was considered as the reference (HJCEOS). Euclidean distances between HJCs estimated by each of the 6 methods and the HJCEOS were calculated; distances were shown to be lower in predictive compared to functional methods (p<0.0001). Contrarily to findings in adults, functional methods were shown to be less accurate than predictive methods in TD and CP children, which could be mainly due to the shorter thigh segment in children. Harrington method was shown to be the most accurate in the prediction of HJC (mean error≈18mm, SD=9mm) and quasi-equivalent to the Bell method. The bias for each method was quantified, allowing its correction for an improved HJC estimation.
髋关节中心(HJC)的定位在步态数据计算中至关重要。EOS低剂量双平面X射线已被证明是评估成人HJC定位各种方法的良好参考。目的是使用EOS作为基于图像的参考,评估典型发育(TD)和脑瘫(CP)儿童中HJC定位的预测性和功能性技术。11名TD儿童和17名CP儿童接受了三维步态分析。在每组双侧评估六种HJC定位方法:三种预测性方法(插入式步态法、贝尔法和哈林顿法)和三种基于星弧技术的功能性方法(对称旋转中心估计法、中心变换技术和几何球体拟合)。然后所有儿童均接受EOS低剂量双平面X线摄影。对骨盆、下肢及其相应的外部标记物进行三维重建。将股骨头中心视为参考(HJCEOS)。计算通过六种方法中的每一种估计的HJC与HJCEOS之间的欧几里得距离;结果显示,与功能性方法相比,预测性方法的距离更低(p<0.0001)。与成人的研究结果相反,在TD和CP儿童中,功能性方法的准确性低于预测性方法,这可能主要是由于儿童的大腿段较短。哈林顿法在HJC预测中显示出最准确(平均误差≈18mm,标准差=9mm),且与贝尔法近似等效。对每种方法的偏差进行了量化,以便对其进行校正以改进HJC估计。