Huang Yangjian, Xu Junkai, Yu Bo, Shull Peter B
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Gait Posture. 2016 Jul;48:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
Increased physical activity can provide numerous health benefits. The relationship between physical activity and health assumes reliable activity measurements including step count and distance traveled. This study assessed step count and distance accuracy for Nike+ FuelBand, Jawbone UP 24, Fitbit One, Fitbit Flex, Fitbit Zip, Garmin Vivofit, Yamax CW-701, and Omron HJ-321 during level, upstairs, and downstairs walking in healthy adults.
Forty subjects walked on flat ground (400m), upstairs (176 steps), and downstairs (176 steps), and a subset of 10 subjects performed treadmill walking trials to assess the influence of walking speed on accuracy. Activity monitor measured step count and distance values were compared with actual step count (determined from video recordings) and distance to determine accuracy.
For level walking, step count errors in Yamax CW-701, Fitbit Zip, Fitbit One, Omron HJ-321, and Jawbone UP 24 were within 1% and distance errors in Fitbit Zip and Yamax CW-701 were within 5%. Garmin Vivofit and Omron HJ-321 were the most accurate in estimating step count for stairs with errors less than 4%. An important finding is that all activity monitors overestimated distance for stair walking by at least 45%.
In general, there were not accuracy differences among activity monitors for stair walking. Accuracy did not change between moderate and fast walking speeds, though slow walking increased errors for some activity monitors. Nike+ FuelBand was the least accurate step count estimator during all walking tasks. Caution should be taken when interpreting step count and distance estimates for activities involving stairs.
增加身体活动能带来诸多健康益处。身体活动与健康之间的关系取决于可靠的活动测量,包括步数和行走距离。本研究评估了健康成年人在平路、上楼和下楼行走时,耐克+FuelBand、Jawbone UP 24、Fitbit One、Fitbit Flex、Fitbit Zip、佳明Vivofit、百利达CW - 701和欧姆龙HJ - 321的步数和距离准确性。
40名受试者在平地上行走(400米)、上楼(176级台阶)和下楼(176级台阶),其中10名受试者的子集进行了跑步机行走试验,以评估步行速度对准确性的影响。将活动监测器测量的步数和距离值与实际步数(由视频记录确定)和距离进行比较,以确定准确性。
对于平路行走,百利达CW - 701、Fitbit Zip、Fitbit One、欧姆龙HJ - 321和Jawbone UP 24的步数误差在1%以内,Fitbit Zip和百利达CW - 701的距离误差在5%以内。佳明Vivofit和欧姆龙HJ - 321在估计楼梯步数方面最准确,误差小于4%。一个重要发现是,所有活动监测器在楼梯行走时都至少高估了45%的距离。
一般来说,活动监测器在楼梯行走方面的准确性没有差异。在中等和快速步行速度之间,准确性没有变化,尽管慢走会增加一些活动监测器的误差。在所有行走任务中,耐克+FuelBand是最不准确的步数估计器。在解释涉及楼梯活动的步数和距离估计时应谨慎。