臂丛神经损伤患者报告结局测量工具——臂丛评估工具的内部结构效度及单维度性评估

Evaluation of Internal Construct Validity and Unidimensionality of the Brachial Assessment Tool, A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Brachial Plexus Injury.

作者信息

Hill Bridget, Pallant Julie, Williams Gavin, Olver John, Ferris Scott, Bialocerkowski Andrea

机构信息

Menzies Health Institute, Queensland, Griffith University, QLD, Australia; Epworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Dec;97(12):2146-2156. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.021. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the internal construct validity and dimensionality of a new patient-reported outcome measure for people with traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health definition of activity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (age range, 18-82y) with a traumatic BPI (N=106).

INTERVENTIONS

There were 106 people with BPI who completed a 51-item 5-response questionnaire. Responses were analyzed in 4 phases (missing responses, item correlations, exploratory factor analysis, and Rasch analysis) to evaluate the properties of fit to the Rasch model, threshold response, local dependency, dimensionality, differential item functioning, and targeting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable, as this study addresses the development of an outcome measure.

RESULTS

Six items were deleted for missing responses, and 10 were deleted for high interitem correlations >.81. The remaining 35 items, while demonstrating fit to the Rasch model, showed evidence of local dependency and multidimensionality. Items were divided into 3 subscales: dressing and grooming (8 items), arm and hand (17 items), and no hand (6 items). All 3 subscales demonstrated fit to the model with no local dependency, minimal disordered thresholds, no unidimensionality or differential item functioning for age, time postinjury, or self-selected dominance. Subscales were combined into 3 subtests and demonstrated fit to the model, no misfit, and unidimensionality, allowing calculation of a summary score.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary analysis supports the internal construct validity of the Brachial Assessment Tool, a unidimensional targeted 4-response patient-reported outcome measure designed to solely assess activity after traumatic BPI regardless of level of injury, age at recruitment, premorbid limb dominance, and time postinjury. Further examination is required to determine test-retest reliability and responsiveness.

摘要

目的

基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》中活动的定义,评估一种针对创伤性臂丛神经损伤(BPI)患者的新的患者报告结局测量工具的内部结构效度和维度。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

门诊诊所。

参与者

18至82岁的创伤性BPI成年患者(N = 106)。

干预措施

106名BPI患者完成了一份包含51个项目、5级反应的问卷。对回答进行了4个阶段的分析(缺失回答、项目相关性、探索性因素分析和拉施分析),以评估与拉施模型的拟合特性、阈值反应、局部依赖性、维度、项目功能差异和目标定位。

主要结局指标

不适用,因为本研究关注的是一种结局测量工具的开发。

结果

6个项目因缺失回答被删除,10个项目因项目间相关性>0.81被删除。其余35个项目虽显示符合拉施模型,但存在局部依赖性和多维性的证据。项目被分为3个分量表:穿衣和修饰(8个项目)、手臂和手部(17个项目)以及无手部功能(6个项目)。所有3个分量表均显示符合模型,无局部依赖性,阈值紊乱最小,对于年龄、受伤时间或自我选择的优势侧不存在单维性或项目功能差异。分量表被合并为3个分测验,显示符合模型,无失拟,且具有单维性,从而可以计算出一个总分。

结论

这项初步分析支持臂丛神经评估工具的内部结构效度,该工具是一种单维、有针对性的4级反应患者报告结局测量工具,旨在仅评估创伤性BPI后的活动情况,而不考虑损伤水平、招募时的年龄、病前肢体优势侧和受伤时间。需要进一步检验以确定重测信度和反应度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索