Bravini Elisabetta, Franchignoni Franco, Giordano Andrea, Sartorio Francesco, Ferriero Giorgio, Vercelli Stefano, Foti Calogero
School in Advanced Sciences and Technology in Rehabilitation Medicine and Sports, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Unit of Occupational Rehabilitation and Ergonomics, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Scientific Institute of Veruno, Veruno, Italy.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jan;96(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
To perform a comprehensive analysis of the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis (RA).
Prospective, single-group observational design.
Freestanding rehabilitation center.
Convenience sample of Italian-speaking subjects with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders (N=174).
Not applicable.
The Italian version of the ULFI. Data were analyzed using parallel analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and RA for evaluating dimensionality, functioning of rating scale categories, item fit, hierarchy of item difficulties, and reliability indices.
Parallel analysis revealed 2 factors explaining 32.5% and 10.7% of the response variance. RA confirmed the failure of the unidimensionality assumption, and 6 items out of the 25 misfitted the Rasch model. When the analysis was rerun excluding the misfitting items, the scale showed acceptable fit values, loading meaningfully to a single factor. Item separation reliability and person separation reliability were .98 and .89, respectively. Cronbach alpha was .92.
RA revealed weakness of the scale concerning dimensionality and internal construct validity. However, a set of 19 ULFI items defined through the statistical process demonstrated a unidimensional structure, good psychometric properties, and clinical meaningfulness. These findings represent a useful starting point for further analyses of the tool (based on modern psychometric approaches and confirmatory factor analysis) in larger samples, including different patient populations and nationalities.
运用经典测试理论和拉施分析(RA)对上肢功能指数(ULFI)的心理测量特性和维度进行全面分析。
前瞻性单组观察性设计。
独立康复中心。
讲意大利语的上肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的便利样本(N = 174)。
不适用。
ULFI的意大利语版本。使用平行分析、探索性因素分析和RA对数据进行分析,以评估维度、评定量表类别的功能、项目拟合度、项目难度层次以及可靠性指标。
平行分析显示有两个因素解释了32.5%和10.7%的反应方差。RA证实了单维度假设不成立,25个项目中有6个不符合拉施模型。排除不符合的项目后重新进行分析时,该量表显示出可接受的拟合值,有意义地加载到单个因素上。项目区分可靠性和人员区分可靠性分别为0.98和0.89。克朗巴哈α系数为0.92。
RA揭示了该量表在维度和内部结构效度方面的不足。然而,通过统计过程确定的一组19个ULFI项目显示出单维度结构、良好的心理测量特性和临床意义。这些发现为在更大样本(包括不同患者群体和国籍)中基于现代心理测量方法和验证性因素分析对该工具进行进一步分析提供了有用的起点。