Di Gianfilippo Martina, Costa Giulia, Verginelli Iason, Gavasci Renato, Lombardi Francesco
Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Waste Manag. 2016 Oct;56:216-28. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.034. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
This paper investigates the leaching behaviour of specific types of waste thermal treatment bottom ash (BA) as a function of both pH and the liquid-to-solid ratio (L/S). Specifically, column percolation tests and different types of batch tests (including pH-dependence) were applied to BA produced by hospital waste incineration (HW-I), Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) gasification (RDF-G) and RDF incineration (RDF-I). The results of these tests were interpreted applying an integrated graphical and modelling approach aimed at identifying the main mechanisms (solubility, availability or time-controlled dissolution and diffusion) governing the release of specific constituents from each type of BA. The final aim of this work was in fact to gain insight on the information that can be provided by the leaching tests applied, and hence on which ones may be more suitable to apply for assessing the leaching concentrations expected in the field. The results of the leaching tests showed that the three samples of analysed BA presented differences of orders of magnitude in their leaching behaviour, especially as a function of pH, but also in terms of the L/S. These were mainly related to the differences in mineralogy of the samples. In addition, for the same type of bottom ash, the comparison between the results of batch and percolation column tests, expressed in terms of cumulative release, showed that for some constituents (e.g. Mg for HW-I BA and Cu for RDF-G BA) differences of over one order of magnitude were obtained due to variations in pH and DOC release. Similarly, the eluate concentrations observed in the percolation tests, for most of the investigated elements, were not directly comparable with the results of the pH-dependence tests. In particular, in some cases the percolation test results showed eluate concentrations of some constituents (e.g. K and Ca in HW-I BA) of up to one order of magnitude higher than the values obtained from the pH-dependence experiments at the same pH value. This was attributed to a rapid washout from the column of the soluble phases present in the BA. In contrast, for other constituents (e.g. Mg and Ba for the RDF-G BA), especially at high L/S ratios, the concentrations in the column tests were of up to one order of magnitude lower than the solubility value, indicating release under non-equilibrium conditions. In these cases, batch pH-dependence tests should be preferred, since column tests results could underestimate the concentrations expected in the field.
本文研究了特定类型的废热处理底灰(BA)的浸出行为与pH值和液固比(L/S)的关系。具体而言,对医院垃圾焚烧(HW-I)、衍生燃料(RDF)气化(RDF-G)和RDF焚烧(RDF-I)产生的BA进行了柱渗透试验和不同类型的批次试验(包括pH依赖性试验)。这些试验结果采用综合的图形和建模方法进行解释,旨在确定控制每种类型BA中特定成分释放的主要机制(溶解度、有效性或时间控制的溶解和扩散)。这项工作的最终目的实际上是深入了解所应用的浸出试验能够提供的信息,从而了解哪些试验可能更适合用于评估现场预期的浸出浓度。浸出试验结果表明,所分析的三种BA样品在浸出行为上存在数量级差异,特别是作为pH值的函数,在L/S方面也是如此。这些差异主要与样品矿物学的差异有关。此外,对于同一类型的底灰,以累积释放量表示的批次试验和渗透柱试验结果之间的比较表明,由于pH值和溶解性有机碳(DOC)释放的变化,对于某些成分(如HW-I BA中的Mg和RDF-G BA中的Cu),获得了超过一个数量级的差异。同样,在渗透试验中观察到的洗脱液浓度,对于大多数研究元素来说,与pH依赖性试验的结果没有直接可比性。特别是,在某些情况下,渗透试验结果显示某些成分(如HW-I BA中的K和Ca)的洗脱液浓度比在相同pH值下从pH依赖性实验中获得的值高出一个数量级。这归因于BA中存在的可溶相从柱中快速洗脱。相反,对于其他成分(如RDF-G BA中的Mg和Ba),特别是在高L/S比下情况下,柱试验中的浓度比溶解度值低一个数量级,表明在非平衡条件下释放。在这些情况下,应优先选择批次pH依赖性试验,因为柱试验结果可能会低估现场预期的浓度。