Suppr超能文献

《疼痛警觉与意识问卷》(PVAQ)德文版在无疼痛样本以及急性和慢性疼痛样本中的心理测量特性。

Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ) in Pain-Free Samples and Samples with Acute and Chronic Pain.

作者信息

Kunz M, Capito E S, Horn-Hofmann C, Baum C, Scheel J, Karmann A J, Priebe J A, Lautenbacher S

机构信息

Physiological Psychology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.

Department of Family Medicine, Geriatrics Section, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;24(2):260-271. doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9585-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The way individuals attend to pain is known to have a considerable impact on the experience and chronification of pain. One method to assess the habitual "attention to pain" is the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ). With the present study, we aimed to test the psychometric properties of the German version of the PVAQ across pain-free samples and across patients with acute and chronic pain.

METHOD

Two samples of pain-free individuals (student sample (N = 255)/non-student sample (N = 362)) and two clinical pain samples (acute pain patients (N = 105)/chronic pain patients (N = 36)) were included in this cross-sectional evaluation of the German PVAQ. Factor structure was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha). Construct validity was tested by assessing correlations between PVAQ and theoretically related constructs.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis (non-student sample) and confirmatory factor analysis (student sample, acute pain patient sample) suggested that a two-factor solution best fitted our data ("attention to pain," "attention to changes in pain"). Internal consistency ranged from acceptable to good in all four samples. As hypothesized, the PVAQ correlated significantly with theoretically related constructs in all four samples, suggesting good construct validity in pain-free individuals and in pain patients.

CONCLUSION

The German PVAQ shows good psychometric properties across samples of pain-free individuals and patients suffering from pain that are comparable to PVAQ versions of other languages. Thus, the German PVAQ seems to be a measure of pain vigilance equally valid as found in other countries.

摘要

目的

众所周知,个体对待疼痛的方式会对疼痛体验及慢性化产生重大影响。评估习惯性“对疼痛的关注”的一种方法是疼痛警觉与意识问卷(PVAQ)。在本研究中,我们旨在测试德语版PVAQ在无疼痛样本以及急性和慢性疼痛患者中的心理测量特性。

方法

本横断面评估纳入了两个无疼痛个体样本(学生样本(N = 255)/非学生样本(N = 362))以及两个临床疼痛样本(急性疼痛患者(N = 105)/慢性疼痛患者(N = 36))。使用探索性和验证性因素分析评估因素结构。使用内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数)评估信度。通过评估PVAQ与理论相关结构之间的相关性来测试结构效度。

结果

探索性因素分析(非学生样本)和验证性因素分析(学生样本、急性疼痛患者样本)表明,两因素解决方案最适合我们的数据(“对疼痛的关注”,“对疼痛变化的关注”)。在所有四个样本中,内部一致性从可接受到良好不等。正如假设的那样,PVAQ在所有四个样本中均与理论相关结构显著相关,表明在无疼痛个体和疼痛患者中具有良好的结构效度。

结论

德语版PVAQ在无疼痛个体样本和疼痛患者中均显示出良好的心理测量特性,与其他语言版本的PVAQ相当。因此,德语版PVAQ似乎是一种与其他国家同样有效的疼痛警觉测量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b84/5344944/2bbe2ed45d2d/12529_2016_9585_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验