Suppr超能文献

比较造血干细胞移植患者中1单位与2单位平均红细胞输注发作率的比率。

Comparing the ratio of mean red blood cell transfusion episode rate of 1 unit versus 2 units in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

作者信息

Avdić Aldijana, Tucker Sharon, Evans Rhonda, Smith Anne, Zimmerman M Bridget

机构信息

Joint Office for Compliance.

Department of Nursing Services and Patient Care.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2016 Sep;56(9):2346-51. doi: 10.1111/trf.13708. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two units of red blood cells (RBCs) were typically transfused with each transfusion among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Concerns regarding this practice are increased morbidity, mortality, hospital-acquired infections, length of stay (LOS), and transfusion-related complications. This study compared outcomes of transfusing 1 unit of RBCs per transfusion episode to 2 units of RBCs per episode among HSCT patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective record review was used to evaluate a practice change of transfusing 1 RBC unit per episode among autologous and allogeneic HSCT patients. Primary endpoints included: 1) mean number of RBC transfusion episodes during the hospital stay, 2) mean number of RBC units transfused adjusted by LOS, and 3) mean LOS.

RESULTS

Among autologous patients, the ratio of mean rate of transfusion episodes for transfusing 1 unit versus 2 units per transfusion was 1.24, with a one-tailed 95% upper limit of 1.42. With a noninferiority upper bound of 1.50, using 1 unit per transfusion episode was noninferior to 2 units per transfusion episode (p = 0.011). Among allogeneic HSCT patients, the ratio of mean transfusion episode rate was 1.26 with a one-tailed 95% upper limit of 1.52, which was slightly above the 1.50 noninferiority bound (p = 0.061).

CONCLUSION

A single-unit transfusion policy was not inferior to the 2-unit policy for autologous HSCT patients and trended toward noninferiority for allogeneic transplant patients. The mean volume of blood per LOS was lower for the 1-unit practice for both groups. The gains from the practice change may outweigh the risks of not changing.

摘要

背景

造血干细胞移植(HSCT)患者每次输血通常输注两个单位的红细胞(RBC)。对这种做法的担忧包括发病率增加、死亡率上升、医院获得性感染、住院时间(LOS)以及输血相关并发症。本研究比较了HSCT患者每次输血输注1个单位RBC与每次输注2个单位RBC的结果。

研究设计与方法

采用回顾性记录审查来评估自体和异基因HSCT患者每次输注1个RBC单位的做法变化。主要终点包括:1)住院期间RBC输血次数的平均值,2)根据住院时间调整的RBC输注单位的平均值,以及3)平均住院时间。

结果

在自体患者中,每次输血输注1个单位与2个单位的平均输血次数比率为1.24,单尾95%上限为1.42。非劣效性上限为1.50,每次输血输注1个单位不劣于每次输注2个单位(p = 0.011)。在异基因HSCT患者中,平均输血次数比率为1.26,单尾95%上限为1.52,略高于1.50的非劣效性界限(p = 0.061)。

结论

对于自体HSCT患者,单单位输血策略不劣于双单位策略,对于异基因移植患者有非劣效性趋势。两组采用1个单位的做法时,每住院时间的平均输血量较低。做法改变带来的益处可能超过不改变的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验