Suppr超能文献

造血干细胞移植中自由与限制红细胞输血阈值的比较:一项随机、开放标签、III 期、非劣效性试验。

Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Randomized, Open Label, Phase III, Noninferiority Trial.

机构信息

University of Calgary Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Ottawa Hospital Centre for Transfusion Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1463-1473. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01836. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evidence regarding red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices and their impact on hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes are poorly understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a noninferiority randomized controlled trial in four different centers that evaluated patients with hematologic malignancies requiring HCT who were randomly assigned to either a restrictive (hemoglobin [Hb] threshold < 70 g/L) or liberal (Hb threshold < 90 g/L) RBC transfusion strategy between day 0 and day 100. The noninferiority margin corresponds to a 12% absolute difference between groups in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) score relative to baseline. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by FACT-BMT score at day 100. Additional end points were collected: HRQOL by FACT-BMT score at baseline and at days 7, 14, 28, 60, and 100; transplantation-related mortality; length of hospital stay; intensive care unit admissions; acute graft-versus-host disease; Bearman toxicity score; sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; serious infections; WHO Bleeding Scale; transfusion requirements; and reactions to therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were randomly assigned to either restrictive-strategy or liberal-strategy treatment groups between 2011 and 2016 at four Canadian adult HCT centers. After HCT, mean pre-transfusion Hb levels were 70.9 g/L in the restrictive-strategy group and 84.6 g/L in the liberal-strategy group ( < .0001). The number of RBC units transfused was lower in the restrictive-strategy group than in the liberal-strategy group (mean, 2.73 units [standard deviation, 4.81 units] 5.02 units [standard deviation, 6.13 units]; = .0004). After adjusting for transfusion type and baseline FACT-BMT score, the restrictive-strategy group had a higher FACT-BMT score at day 100 (difference of 1.6 points; 95% CI, -2.5 to 5.6 points), which was noninferior compared with that of the liberal-strategy group. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the transfusion strategies.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing HCT, the use of a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy threshold of 70 g/L was as effective as a threshold of 90 g/L and resulted in similar HRQOL and HCT outcomes with fewer transfusions.

摘要

目的

有关红细胞(RBC)输血实践及其对造血细胞移植(HCT)结果影响的证据了解甚少。

患者和方法

我们在四个不同的中心进行了一项非劣效性随机对照试验,评估了需要 HCT 的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,这些患者在第 0 天至第 100 天期间随机分配至限制性(血红蛋白[Hb]阈值<70 g/L)或宽松性(Hb 阈值<90 g/L)RBC 输血策略。非劣效性边界对应于基线时功能性评估癌症治疗-骨髓移植(FACT-BMT)评分相对于基线的两组之间 12%的绝对差异。主要结局是第 100 天时通过 FACT-BMT 评分测量的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。收集了其他终点:基线时和第 7、14、28、60 和 100 天时通过 FACT-BMT 评分测量的 HRQOL;移植相关死亡率;住院时间;重症监护病房入院;急性移植物抗宿主病;Bearman 毒性评分;窦状隙阻塞综合征;严重感染;世界卫生组织出血量表;输血需求;以及对治疗的反应。

结果

2011 年至 2016 年期间,在加拿大四个成人 HCT 中心,共有 300 名患者随机分配至限制性策略或宽松性策略治疗组。HCT 后,限制性策略组的平均预输血 Hb 水平为 70.9 g/L,宽松性策略组为 84.6 g/L(<0.0001)。限制性策略组输注的 RBC 单位数低于宽松性策略组(平均,2.73 单位[标准差,4.81 单位] 5.02 单位[标准差,6.13 单位];=0.0004)。在调整输血类型和基线 FACT-BMT 评分后,限制性策略组第 100 天的 FACT-BMT 评分更高(差值 1.6 分;95%CI,-2.5 至 5.6 分),与宽松性策略组相当。两种输血策略之间在临床结局方面无显著差异。

结论

在接受 HCT 的患者中,使用 70 g/L 的限制性 RBC 输血策略阈值与使用 90 g/L 的阈值一样有效,且可导致相似的 HRQOL 和 HCT 结局,同时输血更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验