• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单采与双采输血:血液恶性肿瘤患者的安全性和疗效。

Single versus double-unit transfusion: Safety and efficacy for patients with hematologic malignancies.

机构信息

Department of Hematology/Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Department of Pathology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2019 May;102(5):383-388. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13211. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1111/ejh.13211
PMID:30664281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6542263/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion have decreased, double-unit RBC transfusion practices persist. We studied the effects switching from predominantly double-unit to single-unit RBC transfusions had on utilization and clinical outcomes for malignant hematology patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review compared malignant hematology patients before and after implementing single-unit RBC transfusion policy. Hemoglobin threshold was 8.0 g/dL for both groups. RBC utilization metrics included number of RBC units transfused, RBC units transfused per admission, and number of transfusion episodes. Clinical outcomes included length of stay, 30-day mortality, and outpatient RBC transfusion 30-days post-discharge.

RESULTS

Baseline hemoglobin was similar in both groups. The single-unit group was transfused with fewer RBC units per admission (5.1 vs 4.5, P = 0.01) than the double-unit group, but had more transfusion episodes per admission (4.1 vs 2.7, P < 0.001). After implementing single-unit policy, a 29% reduction in RBC utilization was observed. Mean hemoglobin at discharge was lower in the single-unit group (8.9 vs 9.5 g/dL, P = 0.005). No significant differences in length of stay or 30-day mortality were observed.

CONCLUSION

Transfusing malignant hematology patients with single RBC units is safe and efficacious. Electronic provider order systems facilitating RBC transfusion requests provide excellent adherence to transfusion policy.

摘要

目的

尽管红细胞(RBC)输血的血红蛋白阈值已经降低,但仍存在双单位 RBC 输血的做法。我们研究了从主要的双单位输血转为单单位 RBC 输血对恶性血液病患者的利用和临床结果的影响。

方法

回顾性病历比较了实施单单位 RBC 输血政策前后的恶性血液病患者。两组的血红蛋白阈值均为 8.0 g/dL。RBC 利用指标包括输注的 RBC 单位数、每次入院的 RBC 单位数和输血次数。临床结果包括住院时间、30 天死亡率和出院后 30 天门诊 RBC 输血。

结果

两组的基线血红蛋白相似。单单位组每次入院输注的 RBC 单位数较少(5.1 比 4.5,P = 0.01),但每次入院的输血次数较多(4.1 比 2.7,P < 0.001)。实施单单位政策后,RBC 利用率降低了 29%。单单位组出院时的平均血红蛋白较低(8.9 比 9.5 g/dL,P = 0.005)。住院时间或 30 天死亡率无显著差异。

结论

为恶性血液病患者输注单单位 RBC 是安全有效的。电子医嘱系统有利于 RBC 输血申请,可确保很好地遵守输血政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c5/6542263/160048e9af7a/nihms-1023571-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c5/6542263/a2952466d1e6/nihms-1023571-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c5/6542263/160048e9af7a/nihms-1023571-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c5/6542263/a2952466d1e6/nihms-1023571-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c5/6542263/160048e9af7a/nihms-1023571-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Single versus double-unit transfusion: Safety and efficacy for patients with hematologic malignancies.单采与双采输血:血液恶性肿瘤患者的安全性和疗效。
Eur J Haematol. 2019 May;102(5):383-388. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13211. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Randomized, Open Label, Phase III, Noninferiority Trial.造血干细胞移植中自由与限制红细胞输血阈值的比较:一项随机、开放标签、III 期、非劣效性试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1463-1473. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01836. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Benefits and harms of red blood cell transfusions in patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中感染性休克患者红细胞输血的益处与危害
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
4
Blood transfusion in hematologic intensive care unit.血液学重症监护病房中的输血
Transfusion. 2017 Feb;57(2):296-302. doi: 10.1111/trf.13908. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
5
Comparing the ratio of mean red blood cell transfusion episode rate of 1 unit versus 2 units in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.比较造血干细胞移植患者中1单位与2单位平均红细胞输注发作率的比率。
Transfusion. 2016 Sep;56(9):2346-51. doi: 10.1111/trf.13708. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
6
Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients admitted to a long-term acute care facility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.重组人促红细胞生成素对入住长期急性护理机构的重症患者的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2310-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233873.17954.42.
7
Blood use in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for acute leukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the impact of a health system-wide patient blood management program.急性白血病强化化疗或造血干细胞移植患者的用血情况:全卫生系统患者血液管理项目的影响
Transfusion. 2017 Sep;57(9):2189-2196. doi: 10.1111/trf.14191. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
8
Significant reduction of red blood cell transfusion requirements by changing from a double-unit to a single-unit transfusion policy in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation.在接受强化化疗或干细胞移植的患者中,通过将输血策略从双单位改为单单位,可显著减少红细胞输血需求。
Haematologica. 2012 Jan;97(1):116-22. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.047035. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
9
Effect of single-unit transfusion in patients treated for haematological disease including acute leukemia: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.单采输血治疗血液系统疾病(包括急性白血病)患者的效果:一项多中心随机对照临床试验。
Leuk Res. 2023 Jun;129:107058. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107058. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
10
A retrospective study evaluating single-unit red blood cell transfusions in reducing allogeneic blood exposure.一项评估单单位红细胞输注以减少异体血暴露情况的回顾性研究。
Transfus Med. 2005 Aug;15(4):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j.0958-7578.2005.00592.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of post-decompressive haematuria in rapid versus gradual bladder decompression in patients with chronic urinary retention.慢性尿潴留患者快速与缓慢膀胱减压后减压性血尿的比较。
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024 Jul-Sep;14(3):249-254. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_5_24. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Blood Transfusion Complications and Associated Factors Among Blood-Transfused Adult Patients at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: A Cross Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚德布雷马科斯综合专科医院输血成年患者的输血并发症及相关因素:一项横断面研究
J Blood Med. 2023 Jun 8;14:389-398. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S412002. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Hospital-Acquired Anemia.医院获得性贫血的发病率、预测因素及结局
J Hosp Med. 2017 May;12(5):317-322. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2712.
2
Single-unit transfusions and hemoglobin trigger: relative impact on red cell utilization.单次输血与血红蛋白触发因素:对红细胞利用的相对影响。
Transfusion. 2017 May;57(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1111/trf.14000. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
3
Blood transfusion in hematologic intensive care unit.血液学重症监护病房中的输血
Implementation of a patient blood management program based on a low-income country-adapted clinical decision support system.
基于低收入国家适应性临床决策支持系统实施患者血液管理计划。
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2022 Jul-Sep;44(3):374-378. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
Transfusion. 2017 Feb;57(2):296-302. doi: 10.1111/trf.13908. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
4
Red blood cell transfusion triggers in acute leukemia: a randomized pilot study.急性白血病中红细胞输注的触发因素:一项随机试点研究。
Transfusion. 2016 Jul;56(7):1750-7. doi: 10.1111/trf.13658. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
Implementing a blood utilization program to optimize transfusion practice.实施血液利用计划以优化输血实践。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:444-7. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2015.1.444.
6
Comparison of a restrictive versus liberal red cell transfusion policy for patients with myelodysplasia, aplastic anaemia, and other congenital bone marrow failure disorders.对于骨髓增生异常综合征、再生障碍性贫血及其他先天性骨髓衰竭性疾病患者,限制性与宽松性红细胞输血策略的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD011577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011577.pub2.
7
Implementation of a clinical decision support system improves compliance with restrictive transfusion policies in hematology patients.实施临床决策支持系统可提高血液学患者对限制性输血政策的依从性。
Transfusion. 2015 Aug;55(8):1964-71. doi: 10.1111/trf.13075. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for red blood cell transfusion: systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.限制与宽松输血策略用于红细胞输血:系统评价随机试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 24;350:h1354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1354.
9
The AABB recommendations for the Choosing Wisely campaign of the American Board of Internal Medicine.美国血库协会(AABB)针对美国内科医学委员会“明智选择”活动的建议。
Transfusion. 2014 Sep;54(9):2344-52. doi: 10.1111/trf.12802. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
10
The success of our patient blood management program depended on an institution-wide change in transfusion practices.我们的患者血液管理计划的成功取决于全机构范围内输血实践的改变。
Transfusion. 2014 Oct;54(10 Pt 2):2617-24. doi: 10.1111/trf.12536. Epub 2014 Jan 12.