Suppr超能文献

单采与双采输血:血液恶性肿瘤患者的安全性和疗效。

Single versus double-unit transfusion: Safety and efficacy for patients with hematologic malignancies.

机构信息

Department of Hematology/Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Department of Pathology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2019 May;102(5):383-388. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13211. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion have decreased, double-unit RBC transfusion practices persist. We studied the effects switching from predominantly double-unit to single-unit RBC transfusions had on utilization and clinical outcomes for malignant hematology patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review compared malignant hematology patients before and after implementing single-unit RBC transfusion policy. Hemoglobin threshold was 8.0 g/dL for both groups. RBC utilization metrics included number of RBC units transfused, RBC units transfused per admission, and number of transfusion episodes. Clinical outcomes included length of stay, 30-day mortality, and outpatient RBC transfusion 30-days post-discharge.

RESULTS

Baseline hemoglobin was similar in both groups. The single-unit group was transfused with fewer RBC units per admission (5.1 vs 4.5, P = 0.01) than the double-unit group, but had more transfusion episodes per admission (4.1 vs 2.7, P < 0.001). After implementing single-unit policy, a 29% reduction in RBC utilization was observed. Mean hemoglobin at discharge was lower in the single-unit group (8.9 vs 9.5 g/dL, P = 0.005). No significant differences in length of stay or 30-day mortality were observed.

CONCLUSION

Transfusing malignant hematology patients with single RBC units is safe and efficacious. Electronic provider order systems facilitating RBC transfusion requests provide excellent adherence to transfusion policy.

摘要

目的

尽管红细胞(RBC)输血的血红蛋白阈值已经降低,但仍存在双单位 RBC 输血的做法。我们研究了从主要的双单位输血转为单单位 RBC 输血对恶性血液病患者的利用和临床结果的影响。

方法

回顾性病历比较了实施单单位 RBC 输血政策前后的恶性血液病患者。两组的血红蛋白阈值均为 8.0 g/dL。RBC 利用指标包括输注的 RBC 单位数、每次入院的 RBC 单位数和输血次数。临床结果包括住院时间、30 天死亡率和出院后 30 天门诊 RBC 输血。

结果

两组的基线血红蛋白相似。单单位组每次入院输注的 RBC 单位数较少(5.1 比 4.5,P = 0.01),但每次入院的输血次数较多(4.1 比 2.7,P < 0.001)。实施单单位政策后,RBC 利用率降低了 29%。单单位组出院时的平均血红蛋白较低(8.9 比 9.5 g/dL,P = 0.005)。住院时间或 30 天死亡率无显著差异。

结论

为恶性血液病患者输注单单位 RBC 是安全有效的。电子医嘱系统有利于 RBC 输血申请,可确保很好地遵守输血政策。

相似文献

4
Blood transfusion in hematologic intensive care unit.血液学重症监护病房中的输血
Transfusion. 2017 Feb;57(2):296-302. doi: 10.1111/trf.13908. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

3
Blood transfusion in hematologic intensive care unit.血液学重症监护病房中的输血
Transfusion. 2017 Feb;57(2):296-302. doi: 10.1111/trf.13908. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
5
Implementing a blood utilization program to optimize transfusion practice.实施血液利用计划以优化输血实践。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:444-7. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2015.1.444.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验