• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Regional Systems of Care Demonstration Project: American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator.区域护理系统示范项目:美国心脏协会使命:生命线ST段抬高型心肌梗死系统加速器。
Circulation. 2016 Aug 2;134(5):365-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019474.
2
Impact of Regionalization of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care on Treatment Times and Outcomes for Emergency Medical Services-Transported Patients Presenting to Hospitals With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Mission: Lifeline Accelerator-2.区域化 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死救治对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急救医疗服务转运患者的治疗时间和结局的影响:生命线加速 2 计划。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 23;137(4):376-387. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032446. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
3
Improvement in Care and Outcomes for Emergency Medical Service-Transported Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) With and Without Prehospital Cardiac Arrest: A Mission: Lifeline STEMI Accelerator Study.提升伴有和不伴有院前心搏骤停的急救医疗服务转运 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的护理和结局:使命必达生命线 STEMI 加速研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 11;6(10):e005717. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005717.
4
Impact of Regional Systems of Care on Disparities in Care Among Female and Black Patients Presenting With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.区域护理系统对女性和黑人 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者护理差异的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 24;6(10):e007122. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007122.
5
Delays in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的延误。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 24;11(18):1824-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.06.030.
6
Association of Rapid Care Process Implementation on Reperfusion Times Across Multiple ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Networks.快速护理流程实施与多个ST段抬高型心肌梗死网络再灌注时间的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004061.
7
Catheterization Laboratory Activation Time in Patients Transferred With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Mission: Lifeline STEMI Accelerator-2 Project.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转运时导管室激活时间:“使命:生命线STEMI加速-2项目”的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jul;13(7):e006204. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006204. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012.2008 年至 2012 年美国改善 STEMI 患者的护理
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):e008096. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008096.
9
Nationwide Analysis of Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Intervention: Findings From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转至行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的全国性分析:美国心脏协会“使命:生命线”项目的研究结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002450.
10
Comprehensive electrocardiogram-to-device time for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report from the American Heart Association mission: Lifeline program.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的综合心电图至器械时间:美国心脏协会生命线计划的报告。
Am Heart J. 2018 Mar;197:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of chest pain center accreditation on timely reperfusion and in-hospital mortality for STEMI in China.胸痛中心认证对中国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者及时再灌注及院内死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 16;15(1):17103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02151-3.
2
A proposed method for identifying Interfacility transfers in Medicare claims data.一种在医疗保险理赔数据中识别机构间转移的提议方法。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb;60(1):e14367. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14367. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
3
Benchmarking System Monitoring on Quality Improvement in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Registry in Japan.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗质量改进的基准系统监测:日本全国性注册研究
JACC Asia. 2024 Feb 20;4(4):323-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.12.003. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Quality of healthcare and admission rates for acute cardiac events during COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study on ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in China.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医疗保健质量和急性心脏事件的入院率:中国 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 10;12(11):e059720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059720.
5
Rural-Urban Disparities in Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Stroke in the United States.美国心肌梗死、心力衰竭和中风结局的城乡差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 25;79(3):267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.045.
6
Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?急性护理区域化系统的概念综述:区域化是脓毒症护理的下一个前沿领域吗?
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 6;3(1):e12631. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12631. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Prehospital time for patients with acute cardiac complaints: A rural health disparity.急性心脏投诉患者的院前时间:农村卫生差异。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.038. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
8
Can a Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiative Reduce Disparity in the Treatment Delay among ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Different Arrival Modes? Evidence from 33 General Hospitals and Their Anticipated Impact on Healthcare during Disasters and Public Health Emergencies.一项医疗质量改进计划能否减少不同就诊方式的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者治疗延迟的差异?来自33家综合医院的证据及其在灾害和突发公共卫生事件期间对医疗保健的预期影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;9(11):1462. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111462.
9
STEMI care 2021: Addressing the knowledge gaps.2021年ST段抬高型心肌梗死护理:填补知识空白
Am Heart J Plus. 2021 Nov;11:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100044. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
Effect of regional cooperative rescue systems based on chest pain centers for patients with acute myocardial infarction in a first-tier city in China.基于胸痛中心的区域协同救治体系对我国一线城市急性心肌梗死患者的影响。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;16(8):2069-2076. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02681-4. Epub 2021 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Nationwide Analysis of Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Intervention: Findings From the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转至行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的全国性分析:美国心脏协会“使命:生命线”项目的研究结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002450.
2
Increasing percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States: progress and opportunity.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的现状:进展与机遇。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
3
Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study.随着时间推移,直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中门球时间与死亡率之间的关系:一项回顾性研究
Lancet. 2015 Mar 21;385(9973):1114-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61932-2. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
4
Delay from first medical contact to primary PCI and all-cause mortality: a nationwide study of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.从首次医疗接触到直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的延迟与全因死亡率:一项针对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的全国性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Mar 4;3(2):e000486. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000486.
5
Regional systems of care demonstration project: Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator: design and methodology.区域医疗系统示范项目:使命必达生命线 STEMI 系统加速器:设计与方法。
Am Heart J. 2014 Jan;167(1):15-21.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
6
Growth in percutaneous coronary intervention capacity relative to population and disease prevalence.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力的增长与人口和疾病流行率的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Oct 28;2(6):e000370. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000370.
7
Bypassing the emergency department and time to reperfusion in patients with prehospital ST-segment-elevation: findings from the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina Emergency Departments project.绕过急诊科和院前 ST 段抬高患者再灌注时间:来自卡罗莱纳州急诊科急性心肌梗死再灌注项目的发现。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(4):399-406. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000136. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
8
Evidence of systematic duplication by new percutaneous coronary intervention programs.新型经皮冠状动脉介入治疗项目存在系统性重复的证据。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):400-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000019. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
9
Emergency department bypass for ST-Segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients identified with a prehospital electrocardiogram: a report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline program.通过院前心电图识别的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的急诊直通:美国心脏协会生命线计划的报告。
Circulation. 2013 Jul 23;128(4):352-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002339. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
10
The impact of a statewide pre-hospital STEMI strategy to bypass hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention capability on treatment times.全州范围的 STEMI 院前策略对绕过无经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力的医院对治疗时间的影响。
Circulation. 2013 Feb 5;127(5):604-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.118463. Epub 2012 Dec 30.

区域护理系统示范项目:美国心脏协会使命:生命线ST段抬高型心肌梗死系统加速器。

Regional Systems of Care Demonstration Project: American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator.

作者信息

Jollis James G, Al-Khalidi Hussein R, Roettig Mayme L, Berger Peter B, Corbett Claire C, Dauerman Harold L, Fordyce Christopher B, Fox Kathleen, Garvey J Lee, Gregory Tammy, Henry Timothy D, Rokos Ivan C, Sherwood Matthew W, Suter Robert E, Wilson B Hadley, Granger Christopher B

机构信息

From University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (J.G.J.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (H.R.A.-K., M.L.R., C.B.F., K.F., M.W.S., C.B.G.); Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY (P.B.B.); New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC (C.C.C.); University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington (H.L.D.); Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (J.L.G.); American Heart Association, Dallas, TX (T.G., R.E.S.); Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (T.D.H.); UCLA-Olive View Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (I.C.R.); and Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC (B.H.W.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2016 Aug 2;134(5):365-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019474.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019474
PMID:27482000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4975540/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of patients fail to meet ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guideline goals recommending a first medical contact-to-device time of <90 minutes for patients directly presenting to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals and <120 minutes for transferred patients. We sought to increase the proportion of patients treated within guideline goals by organizing coordinated regional reperfusion plans.

METHODS

We established leadership teams, coordinated protocols, and provided regular feedback for 484 hospitals and 1253 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies in 16 regions across the United States.

RESULTS

Between July 2012 and December 2013, 23 809 patients presented with acute STEMI (direct to percutaneous coronary intervention hospital: 11 765 EMS transported and 6502 self-transported; 5542 transferred). EMS-transported patients differed from self-transported patients in symptom onset to first medical contact time (median, 47 versus 114 minutes), incidence of cardiac arrest (10% versus 3%), shock on admission (11% versus 3%), and in-hospital mortality (8% versus 3%; P<0.001 for all comparisons). There was a significant increase in the proportion of patients meeting guideline goals of first medical contact-to-device time, including those directly presenting via EMS (50% to 55%; P<0.001) and transferred patients (44%-48%; P=0.002). Despite regional variability, the greatest gains occurred among patients in the 5 most improved regions, increasing from 45% to 57% (direct EMS; P<0.001) and 38% to 50% (transfers; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator demonstration project represents the largest national effort to organize regional STEMI care. By focusing on first medical contact-to-device time, coordinated treatment protocols, and regional data collection and reporting, we were able to increase significantly the proportion of patients treated within guideline goals.

摘要

背景

高达50%的患者未达到ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)指南目标,该指南建议,对于直接前往有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力医院的患者,首次医疗接触至器械治疗时间应小于90分钟,对于转诊患者则应小于120分钟。我们试图通过组织协调的区域再灌注计划,提高在指南目标规定时间内接受治疗的患者比例。

方法

我们在美国16个地区为484家医院和1253个紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构建立了领导团队,协调了方案,并定期提供反馈。

结果

在2012年7月至2013年12月期间,23809例患者出现急性STEMI(直接前往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗医院:11765例由EMS转运,6502例自行前往;5542例为转诊)。由EMS转运的患者与自行前往的患者在症状发作至首次医疗接触时间(中位数分别为47分钟和114分钟)、心脏骤停发生率(10%对3%)、入院时休克发生率(11%对3%)以及院内死亡率(8%对3%;所有比较P<0.001)方面存在差异。达到首次医疗接触至器械治疗时间指南目标的患者比例显著增加,包括直接由EMS转运的患者(从50%增至55%;P<0.001)和转诊患者(从44%增至48%;P=0.002)。尽管存在区域差异,但在改善最明显的5个地区,患者获益最大,直接由EMS转运的患者从45%增至57%(P<0.001),转诊患者从38%增至50%(P<0.001)。

结论

这项“使命:生命线STEMI系统加速器”示范项目是全国范围内组织区域STEMI护理的最大规模努力。通过关注首次医疗接触至器械治疗时间、协调治疗方案以及区域数据收集和报告,我们能够显著提高在指南目标规定时间内接受治疗的患者比例。