Ferrer-Roca Ventura, Rivero-Palomo Víctor, Ogueta-Alday Ana, Rodríguez-Marroyo José A, García-López Juan
a Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED) , University of León , León , Spain.
b High Performance Centre (CAR) , Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona , Spain.
J Sports Sci. 2017 Jul;35(14):1328-1335. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1215490. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
The main purpose of this study was to assess the acute effects of small changes in crank length (assumable by competitive cyclists) on metabolic cost and pedalling technique during submaximal cycling. Twelve amateur road cyclists performed three sets of submaximal pedalling (150, 200 and 250 W) at a constant cadence (91.3 ± 0.8 rpm) in a randomised order with three commonly used crank lengths, preferred (172.5-175 mm), +5 mm and -5 mm. Energy cost of pedalling, kinetic and kinematic variables were simultaneously registered. Changes in crank length had no significant effect on heart rate (144 ± 13, 145 ± 12 and 145 ± 13 bpm, respectively) and gross efficiency (GE) (20.4 ± 2.1, 20.1 ± 2.2 and 20.3 ± 2.4%, respectively). A longer crank induced a significant (P < 0.05) reduction of positive impulse proportion (PIP) (0.9-1.9%) due to a greater maximum (1.0-2.3 N · m) and minimum torque (1.0-2.2 N · m). At the same time, the maximum flexion and range of motion of the hip and knee joints were significantly increased (1.8-3.4° and P < 0.05), whereas the ankle joint was not affected. In conclusion, the biomechanical changes due to a longer crank did not alter the metabolic cost of pedalling, although they could have long-term adverse effects. Therefore, in case of doubt between two lengths, the shorter one might be recommended.
本研究的主要目的是评估曲柄长度的微小变化(竞技自行车手可能会遇到)对次最大强度骑行时代谢成本和蹬踏技术的急性影响。12名业余公路自行车手以随机顺序,使用三种常用曲柄长度(首选长度[172.5 - 175毫米]、+5毫米和 -5毫米),在恒定踏频(91.3±0.8转/分钟)下进行三组次最大强度蹬踏(150瓦、200瓦和250瓦)。同时记录蹬踏的能量成本、动力学和运动学变量。曲柄长度的变化对心率(分别为144±13、145±12和145±13次/分钟)和总效率(GE)(分别为20.4±2.1%、20.1±2.2%和20.3±2.4%)没有显著影响。较长的曲柄由于更大的最大扭矩(1.0 - 2.3牛·米)和最小扭矩(1.0 - 2.2牛·米),导致正冲量比例(PIP)显著降低(P<0.05)(降低0.9 - 1.9%)。同时,髋关节和膝关节的最大屈曲度和运动范围显著增加(增加1.8 - 3.4°,P<0.05),而踝关节未受影响。总之,较长曲柄引起的生物力学变化虽未改变蹬踏的代谢成本,但可能有长期不良影响。因此,在两种长度存在疑问时,建议选择较短的一种。