Fregly B J, Zajac F E, Dairaghi C A
Rehabilitation R&D Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, California 94304-1200, USA.
J Biomech. 1996 Dec;29(12):1559-67.
Inertial load can affect the control of a dynamic system whenever parts of the system are accelerated or decelerated. During steady-state pedaling, because within-cycle variations in crank angular acceleration still exist, the amount of crank inertia present (which varies widely with road-riding gear ratio) may affect the within-cycle coordination of muscles. However, the effect of inertial load on steady-state pedaling coordination is almost always assumed to be negligible, since the net mechanical energy per cycle developed by muscles only depends on the constant cadence and workload. This study test the hypothesis that under steady-state conditions, the net joint torques produced by muscles at the hip, knee, and ankle are unaffected by crank inertial load. To perform the investigation, we constructed a pedaling apparatus which could emulate the low inertial load of a standard ergometer or the high inertial load of a road bicycle in high gear. Crank angle and bilateral pedal force and angle data were collected from ten subjects instructed to pedal steadily (i.e., constant speed across cycles) and smoothly (i.e., constant speed within a cycle) against both inertias at a constant workload. Virtually no statistically significant changes were found in the net hip and knee muscle joint torques calculated from an inverse dynamics analysis. Though the net ankle muscle joint torque, as well as the one- and two-legged crank torque, showed statistically significant increases at the higher inertia, the changes were small. In contrast, large statistically significant reductions were found in crank kinematic variability both within a cycle and between cycles (i.e., cadence), primarily because a larger inertial load means a slower crank dynamic response. Nonetheless, the reduction in cadence variability was somewhat attenuated by a large statistically significant increase in one-legged crank torque variability. We suggest, therefore, that muscle coordination during steady-state pedaling is largely unaffected, though less well regulated, when crank inertial load is increased.
每当系统的某些部分加速或减速时,惯性负载就会影响动态系统的控制。在稳态蹬踏过程中,由于曲柄角加速度在周期内仍存在变化,曲柄存在的惯性量(随骑行齿轮比变化很大)可能会影响肌肉在周期内的协调性。然而,惯性负载对稳态蹬踏协调性的影响几乎总是被认为可以忽略不计,因为肌肉每周期产生的净机械能仅取决于恒定的踏频和工作量。本研究检验了这样一个假设:在稳态条件下,髋、膝和踝关节处肌肉产生的净关节扭矩不受曲柄惯性负载的影响。为了进行这项研究,我们构建了一种蹬踏装置,它可以模拟标准测力计的低惯性负载或高速档公路自行车的高惯性负载。从十名受试者那里收集了曲柄角度、双侧踏板力和角度数据,这些受试者被要求在恒定工作量下以两种惯性状态稳定地(即跨周期速度恒定)和平稳地(即周期内速度恒定)蹬踏。通过逆动力学分析计算得出的髋部和膝部肌肉净关节扭矩几乎没有发现统计学上的显著变化。虽然在较高惯性状态下,踝关节肌肉净关节扭矩以及单腿和双腿曲柄扭矩显示出统计学上的显著增加,但变化很小。相比之下,在周期内和周期之间(即踏频)曲柄运动学变异性都发现了统计学上的显著大幅降低,主要是因为较大的惯性负载意味着曲柄动态响应较慢。尽管如此,单腿曲柄扭矩变异性的统计学上的显著大幅增加在一定程度上减弱了踏频变异性的降低。因此,我们认为,当曲柄惯性负载增加时,稳态蹬踏过程中的肌肉协调性在很大程度上不受影响,尽管调节得不太好。