Wallis Corrin, Gill Yadvinder, Colyer Alison, Davis Ian, Allsopp Judi, Komarov Gleb, Higham Susan, Harris Stephen
J Vet Dent. 2016 Mar;33(1):26-38. doi: 10.1177/0898756416639787.
The aim of this work was to evaluate Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF) as an alternative to the established Logan and Boyce method for determining plaque coverage of dogs' teeth. In a series of studies in conscious and anesthetized dogs, QLF showed good intra-photographer repeatability (coefficient of variation [CV] of 7.5% for undisclosed teeth) and inter-photographer reproducibility (CV of 3.2% for undisclosed teeth and 8.5% for disclosed teeth). The QLF software accurately identifies areas of plaque as demonstrated by comparison to the variability of 5 human scorers, manually marking plaque on QLF-acquired images (P = 0.1). There was good agreement with the modified Logan and Boyce method in the percentage reduction in plaque accumulation measured when dogs were fed an oral care chew versus no chew. To see a 15% difference in plaque accumulation, which is considered sufficient by the Veterinary Oral Health Council to differentiate between 2 treatments, a retrospective power analysis (90%) of the data established that only 7 dogs would be required, compared to 19 dogs for the modified Logan and Boyce method. QLF is a reliable method for measuring dental plaque in dogs with the added advantage that it is not subjective and requires fewer animals.
这项工作的目的是评估定量光诱导荧光(QLF),作为一种替代已确立的洛根和博伊斯方法来测定犬齿菌斑覆盖率的方法。在一系列针对清醒和麻醉犬的研究中,QLF显示出良好的摄影师内重复性(未暴露牙齿的变异系数[CV]为7.5%)和摄影师间再现性(未暴露牙齿的CV为3.2%,暴露牙齿的CV为8.5%)。与5名人类评分者在QLF获取的图像上手动标记菌斑的变异性相比,QLF软件能准确识别菌斑区域(P = 0.1)。当给犬喂食口腔护理咀嚼物与不喂食咀嚼物时,在测量的菌斑积聚减少百分比方面,与改良的洛根和博伊斯方法有良好的一致性。要观察到菌斑积聚有15%的差异(兽医口腔健康委员会认为这足以区分两种治疗方法),对数据进行的回顾性功效分析(90%)表明,只需要7只犬,而改良的洛根和博伊斯方法需要用到19只犬。QLF是一种测量犬牙菌斑的可靠方法,其额外优势在于它不主观且所需动物数量更少。