Hothi Harry S, Panagiotopoulos Andreas C, Whittaker Robert K, Bills Paul J, McMillan Rebecca A, Skinner John A, Hart Alister J
Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London and the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
The Centre for Precision Technologies, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):291-295. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.045. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
Material loss at the taper junction of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties has been implicated in their early failure. The mechanisms of material loss are not fully understood; analysis of the patterns of damage at the taper can help us better understand why material loss occurs at this junction.
We mapped the patterns of material loss in a series of 155 metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties received at our center by scanning the taper surface using a roundness-measuring machine. We examined these material loss maps to develop a 5-tier classification system based on visual differences between different patterns. We correlated these patterns to surgical, implant, and patient factors known to be important for head-stem taper damage.
We found that 63 implants had "minimal damage" at the taper (material loss <1 mm), and the remaining 92 implants could be categorized by 4 distinct patterns of taper material loss. We found that (1) head diameter and (2) time to revision were key significant variables separating the groups.
These material loss maps allow us to suggest different mechanisms that dominate the cause of the material loss in each pattern: (1) corrosion, (2) mechanically assisted corrosion, or (3) intraoperative damage or poor size tolerances leading to toggling of trunnion in taper.
金属对金属全髋关节置换术的锥度连接处材料损失与早期失败有关。材料损失的机制尚未完全了解;分析锥度处的损伤模式有助于我们更好地理解为何在此连接处会发生材料损失。
我们通过使用圆度测量仪扫描锥度表面,绘制了在我们中心接收的一系列155例金属对金属全髋关节置换术中材料损失的模式。我们检查这些材料损失图,基于不同模式之间的视觉差异开发了一个5级分类系统。我们将这些模式与已知对股骨头柄锥度损伤很重要的手术、植入物和患者因素相关联。
我们发现63个植入物在锥度处有“最小损伤”(材料损失<1毫米),其余92个植入物可根据4种不同的锥度材料损失模式进行分类。我们发现(1)股骨头直径和(2)翻修时间是区分这些组的关键显著变量。
这些材料损失图使我们能够提出不同的机制,这些机制主导了每种模式中材料损失的原因:(1)腐蚀,(2)机械辅助腐蚀,或(3)术中损伤或尺寸公差不佳导致锥度中轴颈的摆动。