Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
ThoraxCenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 8;9(15):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.023.
The study sought to validate the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score II mortality prediction model after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting in a large pooled population of patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD) and/or unprotected left main disease (UPLMD) enrolled in the PRECOMBAT (Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) and BEST (Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease) randomized controlled trials.
For patients with MVD and/or UPLMD, the choice of the best revascularization strategy remains challenging.
Pooled individual patient-level data from PRECOMBAT and BEST were used to assess calibration and discrimination of the SYNTAX score II prediction model for all-cause mortality after PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting at 4-year follow-up. The study population comprised 1,480 patients (600 with UPLMD, 880 with MVD).
The overall incidence of all-cause mortality was 6.1% after a median follow-up period of 4.9 years. Validation plots showed good model calibration overall and across treatment groups but tended to overestimate all-cause mortality in the highest risk quintiles of patients in the whole population and the PCI arm. The SYNTAX score II showed moderate discrimination ability for the whole population (C index = 0.685) but better for patients receiving PCI than CABG (C index = 0.718 vs. 0.662 in patients with UPLMD, C index = 0.700 vs. 0.661 in those with MVD). Observed all-cause mortality was higher when the treatment received was at variance with that recommended by the model and similar when it was concordant.
The SYNTAX score II has good calibration but only moderate discrimination ability for long-term mortality prediction in this randomized population. This score provides an important tool to help guide the heart team's decision-making process regarding the selection of the best revascularization strategy for patients with MVD and/or UPLMD. (Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease, NCT00422968; Bypass Surgery Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease, NCT00997828).
本研究旨在验证 SYNTAX(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术联合治疗)评分 II 模型在多支血管病变(MVD)和/或无保护左主干病变(UPLMD)患者中接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的死亡率预测能力,这些患者来自 PRECOMBAT(左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中使用依维莫司洗脱支架的旁路手术与血管成形术)和 BEST(多支血管疾病患者中使用依维莫司洗脱支架的旁路手术与血管成形术)随机对照试验的大型汇总人群。
对于 MVD 和/或 UPLMD 患者,选择最佳的血运重建策略仍然具有挑战性。
使用 PRECOMBAT 和 BEST 的汇总个体患者水平数据,评估 SYNTAX 评分 II 模型在 4 年随访时预测 PCI 和 CABG 后全因死亡率的校准和区分能力。研究人群包括 1480 例患者(600 例 UPLMD,880 例 MVD)。
中位随访 4.9 年后,全因死亡率总体为 6.1%。验证图显示,整体和各治疗组模型校准情况良好,但在整个人群和 PCI 组的最高风险五分位数患者中,倾向于高估全因死亡率。SYNTAX 评分 II 对全人群具有中等的区分能力(C 指数=0.685),但对接受 PCI 的患者优于 CABG(UPLMD 患者 C 指数=0.718 比 0.662,MVD 患者 C 指数=0.700 比 0.661)。当治疗与模型推荐的治疗方法不一致时,观察到的全因死亡率较高,而当治疗方法一致时,观察到的死亡率相似。
在这个随机人群中,SYNTAX 评分 II 对长期死亡率预测具有良好的校准能力,但仅有中等的区分能力。该评分提供了一个重要的工具,有助于指导心脏团队在选择 MVD 和/或 UPLMD 患者的最佳血运重建策略方面做出决策。(左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中使用依维莫司洗脱支架的旁路手术与血管成形术,NCT00422968;多支血管疾病患者中使用依维莫司洗脱支架的旁路手术与血管成形术,NCT00997828)。