Slusar Joanna, Couban Stephen, Shivakumar Sudeep Pappur
Dalhousie University, Department of Medicine, Halifax, Canada.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):340-343. doi: 10.1111/jep.12616. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
In 2010, wait-times for new patients referred to see a haematologist at our outpatient tertiary care centre clinic exceeded 6 months. The provision of written recommendations for a subset of referred patients was undertaken to reduce patient wait-times. These recommendation letters outlined possible causes of the abnormality for which the patient was being referred and suggested a course of action for follow-up, and patients were then managed by their referring practitioner. We sought to characterize the cohort of patients for whom written recommendations were written and assess whether written recommendations were a satisfactory alternative for the referring practitioner.
All haematology patient referrals managed with written recommendations in 2010 were included in the study and were assessed one year later. Referring practitioners who received written recommendations were sent a short survey to evaluate their satisfaction with this process.
A total of 444 of 2400 referrals were managed with a letter. At 1-year follow-up, 58 (13%, 95% CI) of the abnormalities which prompted the referral had resolved and 201 (45%, 95%CI) had remained stable. There was a single haematology-related death during the 1-year follow-up and the haematological abnormality worsened in 4 (1%) patients. Of 203 (71%) referring practitioners who responded to the satisfaction survey, 90% (95% CI) indicated that they would be satisfied with written recommendations in the future.
The provision of written recommendations appears to be a safe and satisfactory alternative to an inperson outpatient assessment in certain well-defined subsets of stable outpatients with haematologic abnormalities.
2010年,在我们的三级医疗中心门诊诊所,新转诊至血液科医生处就诊的患者等待时间超过6个月。为减少患者等待时间,我们为一部分转诊患者提供了书面建议。这些建议信概述了患者被转诊的异常情况的可能原因,并提出了后续行动方案,然后由转诊医生继续管理这些患者。我们试图对收到书面建议的患者群体进行特征描述,并评估书面建议对转诊医生来说是否是一种令人满意的替代方式。
2010年所有通过书面建议管理的血液科患者转诊病例均纳入本研究,并在一年后进行评估。向收到书面建议的转诊医生发送了一份简短的调查问卷,以评估他们对这一过程的满意度。
2400例转诊病例中共有444例通过信件进行管理。在1年的随访中,促使转诊的异常情况有58例(13%,95%可信区间)已解决,201例(45%,95%可信区间)保持稳定。在1年的随访期间有1例与血液学相关的死亡,4例(1%)患者的血液学异常情况恶化。在回复满意度调查的203名(71%)转诊医生中,90%(95%可信区间)表示他们未来会对书面建议感到满意。
对于某些明确界定的稳定的血液学异常门诊患者亚组,提供书面建议似乎是一种安全且令人满意的替代亲自门诊评估的方式。