Suppr超能文献

电磁导航与血管内主动脉手术中的透视比较:一项幻影研究。

Electromagnetic navigation versus fluoroscopy in aortic endovascular procedures: a phantom study.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

National Competence Centre for Ultrasound and Image-Guided Therapy, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Jan;12(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1466-4. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the possible benefits of electromagnetic (EM) navigation versus conventional fluoroscopy during abdominal aortic endovascular procedures.

METHODS

The study was performed on a phantom representing the abdominal aorta. Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the phantom was acquired and merged with a preoperative multidetector CT (MDCT). The CBCT was performed with a reference plate fixed to the phantom that, after merging the CBCT with the MDCT, facilitated registration of the MDCT volume with the EM space. An EM field generator was stationed near the phantom. Navigation software was used to display EM-tracked instruments within the 3D image volume. Fluoroscopy was performed using a C-arm system. Five operators performed a series of renal artery cannulations using modified instruments, alternatingly using fluoroscopy or EM navigation as the sole guidance method. Cannulation durations and associated radiation dosages were noted along with the number of cannulations complicated by loss of guidewire insertion.

RESULTS

A total of 120 cannulations were performed. The median cannulation durations were 41.5 and 34.5 s for the fluoroscopy- and EM-guided cannulations, respectively. No significant difference in cannulation duration was found between the two modalities (p = 0.736). Only EM navigation showed a significant reduction in cannulation duration in the latter half of its cannulation series compared with the first half (p = 0.004). The median dose area product for fluoroscopy was 0.0836 [Formula: see text]. EM-guided cannulations required a one-time CBCT dosage of 3.0278 [Formula: see text]. Three EM-guided and zero fluoroscopy-guided cannulations experienced loss of guidewire insertion.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that EM navigation is not inferior to fluoroscopy in terms of the ability to guide endovascular interventions. Its utilization may be of particular interest in complex interventions where adequate visualization or minimal use of contrast agents is critical. In vivo studies featuring an optimized implementation of EM navigation should be conducted.

摘要

目的

探索电磁(EM)导航在腹主动脉血管内治疗中相对于传统透视的可能优势。

方法

在模拟腹主动脉的体模上进行研究。术中采集体模的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)并与术前多排 CT(MDCT)融合。将参考板固定在体模上进行 CBCT,在与 MDCT 融合后,便于将 MDCT 容积与 EM 空间进行配准。在体模附近放置一个 EM 场发生器。导航软件用于在 3D 图像体积内显示 EM 跟踪器械。透视使用 C 臂系统进行。五名操作员使用改良器械进行一系列肾动脉插管,交替使用透视或 EM 导航作为唯一的引导方法。记录插管持续时间和相关辐射剂量,以及因导丝插入丢失而导致插管复杂化的次数。

结果

共进行了 120 次插管。透视和 EM 引导插管的中位插管持续时间分别为 41.5 秒和 34.5 秒。两种方式的插管持续时间无显著差异(p = 0.736)。仅 EM 导航在其插管系列的后半段与前半段相比,插管持续时间显著缩短(p = 0.004)。透视的剂量面积乘积中位数为 0.0836 [公式:见正文]。EM 引导插管需要一次性 CBCT 剂量为 3.0278 [公式:见正文]。3 次 EM 引导插管和 0 次透视引导插管出现导丝插入丢失。

结论

我们的发现表明,EM 导航在引导血管内介入方面并不逊于透视。在需要充分可视化或尽量减少对比剂使用的复杂介入中,它的应用可能特别有意义。应该进行具有优化 EM 导航实施的体内研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验