Edwards Meghan K, Loprinzi Paul D
Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Center for Health Behavior Research, The University of Mississippi, University.
Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Center for Health Behavior Research, The University of Mississippi, University.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Aug;91(8):984-98. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.021.
To examine the effects of a free-living, sedentary behavior-inducing randomized controlled intervention on depression and mood profile.
Participants who were confirmed to be active via self-report and accelerometry were randomly assigned to either a sedentary behavior intervention group (n=26) or a control group (n=13) by using a 2:1 sample size ratio for intervention and control groups. The intervention group was asked to eliminate all exercise and minimize steps to 5000 or less steps/d for 1 week, whereas the control group was asked to continue normal physical activity levels for 1 week. Both groups completed a depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and mood (Profile of Moods States) survey preintervention and immediately postintervention. The intervention group was asked to resume normal physical activity levels for 1 week postintervention and then completed the assessments for a third time. All data collection occurred between September 1, 2015, and December 1, 2015.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 group × time interaction analysis revealed that depression scores significantly increased from visit 1 to visit 2 (F=11.85; P=.001). Paired t tests comparing depression scores from visit 2 to visit 3 exhibited a significant decrease from visit 2 to visit 3 (P<.001). Profile of Moods States group × time interaction analysis paralleled depression results; mood scores significantly increased from visit 1 to visit 2 (F=10.03; P=.003) and significantly decreased from visit 2 to visit 3 (P<.001).
A 1-week sedentary behavior-inducing intervention has deleterious effects on depression and mood. To prevent mental health decline in active individuals, consistent regular physical activity may be necessary.
探讨一项自由生活状态下、诱导久坐行为的随机对照干预对抑郁及情绪状态的影响。
通过自我报告和加速度计确认活动水平正常的参与者,按照干预组与对照组2:1的样本量比例,随机分为久坐行为干预组(n = 26)或对照组(n = 13)。干预组被要求在1周内停止所有运动,并将步数减少至5000步或更少,而对照组被要求在1周内保持正常的身体活动水平。两组在干预前和干预后立即完成抑郁(患者健康问卷-9)和情绪(情绪状态量表)调查。干预组在干预后1周被要求恢复正常身体活动水平,然后第三次完成评估。所有数据收集于2015年9月1日至2015年12月1日期间进行。
患者健康问卷-9组×时间交互分析显示,抑郁评分从第1次访视到第2次访视显著增加(F = 11.85;P = .001)。比较第2次访视和第3次访视抑郁评分的配对t检验显示,从第2次访视到第3次访视有显著下降(P < .001)。情绪状态量表组×时间交互分析结果与抑郁结果相似;情绪评分从第1次访视到第2次访视显著增加(F = 10.03;P = .003),从第2次访视到第3次访视显著下降(P < .001)。
为期1周的诱导久坐行为干预对抑郁和情绪有有害影响。为防止活跃个体心理健康下降,持续规律的体育活动可能是必要的。