Suppr超能文献

开发一个从错误中学习的平台:改变初级医生群体中的患者安全文化。

Developing a Platform for Learning from Mistakes: changing the culture of patient safety amongst junior doctors.

作者信息

Millwood Sinead

机构信息

Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Aug 7;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u203658.w2114. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Junior doctors commonly make mistakes which may compromise patient safety. Despite the recent push by the NHS to encourage a "no blame" culture, mistakes are still viewed as shameful, embarrassing and demoralising events. The current model for learning from mistakes means that junior doctors only learn from their own errors. A survey was designed by the author for all the Foundation Year 1 doctors (FY1s) at Yeovil District Hospital to understand better the culture surrounding mistakes, and the types of mistakes that were being made. Using the results of the survey and the support of senior staff, a "Near misses" session has been introduced for FY1s once a month at which mistakes that have been made are discussed, with a consultant present to facilitate the proceedings. The aims of these sessions are to promote a culture of no blame, feedback information to clinical governance, and share learning experiences. 100% of the FY1s had made a mistake that could compromise patient safety. 63% discussed their mistakes with colleagues, 44% with seniors, and only 13% with their educational supervisor. Barriers to discussing mistakes included shame, embarrassment, fear of judgement, and unapproachable seniors. 94% thought a "Near misses" session would be useful. After the third session 100% of the FY1s agreed that the sessions were useful; 53% had changed their practice as a result of something they learned at the sessions. After discussing errors as a group we have worked with the clinical governance department, enacting strategies to avoid repetition of mistakes. Feedback from the junior doctors has been overwhelmingly positive and we have found these sessions to be a simple, inexpensive, and popular solution to cultural change in our organisation.

摘要

初级医生常犯一些可能危及患者安全的错误。尽管英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)近期大力推动“无责”文化,但错误仍被视为可耻、尴尬且令人士气低落的事件。当前从错误中学习的模式意味着初级医生只能从自己的错误中吸取教训。作者设计了一项调查,面向约维尔区医院所有第一年住院医生(FY1s),以更好地了解围绕错误的文化以及所犯错误的类型。利用调查结果并在资深员工的支持下,为FY1s每月举办一次“险些失误”会议,会上会讨论已发生的错误,并有一名顾问在场主持会议进程。这些会议的目的是促进无责文化、向临床治理反馈信息并分享学习经验。100%的FY1s都犯过可能危及患者安全的错误。63%的人会与同事讨论自己的错误,44%的人与上级讨论,而只有13%的人与他们的教育主管讨论。讨论错误的障碍包括羞耻感、尴尬、害怕被评判以及上级难以接近。94%的人认为“险些失误”会议会很有用。第三次会议后,100%的FY1s都认为这些会议很有用;53%的人因在会议上学到的东西而改变了自己的做法。在集体讨论错误后,我们与临床治理部门合作,制定策略以避免错误再次发生。初级医生的反馈绝大多数是积极的,我们发现这些会议是我们组织文化变革的一个简单、低成本且受欢迎的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Developing a Platform for Learning from Mistakes: changing the culture of patient safety amongst junior doctors.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Aug 7;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u203658.w2114. eCollection 2014.
2
[Patient safety 4.0: "Failure of the Week" It's all about role modelling!].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023 Aug;148(15):e87-e97. doi: 10.1055/a-2061-1554. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Adverse incidents and patient safety - improving the learning experience of junior doctors.
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Feb;14(1):42-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-1-42.
4
Learning not to take it seriously: junior doctors' accounts of error.
Med Educ. 2008 Oct;42(10):982-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03151.x.
5
Well-being in newly qualified doctors: exploring the value of peer-led reflective sessions.
BMJ Lead. 2025 Mar 24;9(1):16-21. doi: 10.1136/leader-2023-000917.
6
Evaluating a Ward-based Foundation Year 1 (FY1) System in an Orthopaedic Setting.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(4):393-7. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1173381.
7
Exploring the causes of junior doctors' prescribing mistakes: a qualitative study.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;78(2):310-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12332.
8
Junior doctor-led practical prescribing course.
Clin Teach. 2014 Feb;11(1):29-32. doi: 10.1111/tct.12087.
10
A novel approach to Junior Doctor Induction: A near-peer based curriculum developed and delivered by outgoing Foundation year doctors.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Aug 13;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u203556.w1603. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Twelve Tips for teaching clinical and communication skills online.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jan 29;10:27. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000027.1. eCollection 2021.
3
Perceptions of medical error among general practitioners in rural China: a qualitative interview study.
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Dec 30;12(4):e002528. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002528.
4
Using i-PARIHS to assess implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist: an international qualitative study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):1284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08680-1.
5
Supporting and driving trainee-led leadership.
Future Hosp J. 2015 Oct;2(3):211-217. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.2-3-211.
6
Adverse event detection by medical record review is reproducible, but the assessment of their preventability is not.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0208087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208087. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical complications and their implications for surgeons' well-being.
Br J Surg. 2013 Dec;100(13):1748-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9308.
2
Medical error, incident investigation and the second victim: doing better but feeling worse?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Apr;21(4):267-70. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000605. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
3
Medical errors reported by French general practitioners in training: results of a survey and individual interviews.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Apr;21(4):279-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000359. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
4
Factors associated with disclosure of medical errors by housestaff.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Apr;21(4):271-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000084. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
5
The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider "second victim" after adverse patient events.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Oct;18(5):325-30. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032870.
6
Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review.
Drug Saf. 2009;32(5):379-89. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932050-00002.
8
Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too.
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):726-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验