Ryu Ji Won, Jung Seung Il, Ahn Ji Hoon, Hwang Eu Chang, Yu Ho Song, Kang Taek Won, Kwon Dong Deuk, Park Kwangsung, Kim Jin Woong
Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160 Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Nov;48(11):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1394-9. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of povidone-iodine rectal disinfection and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy based on rectal swab culture results.
From January 2011 to December 2015, we studied differences in infectious complications in men who received povidone-iodine rectal disinfection with targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis and those who received empirical prophylaxis before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Clinical variables including demographics, prior antibiotic, rectal swab culture results, povidone-iodine rectal cleansing, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infectious complications were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups as follows: Group A received no povidone-iodine rectal cleansing but received empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis; group B received povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis; and group C received povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Patients were divided into group A (n = 192; 13.2 %), group B (n = 579; 39.9 %), or group C (n = 679; 46.8 %). In groups A and B, all patients received fluoroquinolone antimicrobial prophylaxis. Group C patients received targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis according to antibiotic resistance of rectal flora, and 71.1 % of these received fluoroquinolone antimicrobial prophylaxis. Infectious complication rates were 3.6, 2.9, and 1.3 % in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. Incidences of acute prostatitis and bacteremia were significantly lower in group C (p = 0.041 and p = 0.049, respectively) than in the other groups.
In the era of quinolone resistance, the combination of povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the rate of infectious complications.
本研究旨在基于直肠拭子培养结果,评估聚维酮碘直肠消毒及针对性抗菌预防措施对接受经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检男性患者的影响。
2011年1月至2015年12月,我们研究了接受聚维酮碘直肠消毒及针对性抗菌预防措施的男性患者与接受经验性预防措施的男性患者在感染性并发症方面的差异。评估了包括人口统计学、既往抗生素使用情况、直肠拭子培养结果、聚维酮碘直肠清洁、抗生素预防措施及感染性并发症等临床变量。患者分为以下三组:A组未进行聚维酮碘直肠清洁,但接受经验性抗菌预防;B组接受聚维酮碘直肠清洁及经验性抗菌预防;C组接受聚维酮碘直肠清洁及针对性抗菌预防。
患者分为A组(n = 192;13.2%)、B组(n = 579;39.9%)或C组(n = 679;46.8%)。A组和B组所有患者均接受氟喹诺酮类抗菌预防。C组患者根据直肠菌群的抗生素耐药性接受针对性抗菌预防,其中71.1%接受氟喹诺酮类抗菌预防。A组、B组和C组的感染性并发症发生率分别为3.6%、2.9%和1.3%。C组急性前列腺炎和菌血症的发生率显著低于其他组(分别为p = 0.041和p = 0.049)。
在喹诺酮耐药时代,聚维酮碘直肠清洁与针对性抗生素预防措施相结合可能降低感染性并发症的发生率。