Kolonko A, Chudek J, Szotowska M, Kuczera P, Wiecek A
Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Transplant Proc. 2016 Jun;48(5):1543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.134.
There is limited evidence regarding the risk factors influencing vascular injury in kidney transplant recipients, except for accelerated vasculopathy and endothelial dysfunction in the pre-transplantation period of end-stage renal failure. Therefore, we performed a cross-sectional study to evaluate the role of traditional and novel or potential nontraditional risk factors in vascular and endothelial dysfunction in a cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients.
One hundred forty-two kidney transplant recipients at 8.4 ± 1.8 years after transplantation were enrolled into the study. Different markers of vascular injury, such as carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT), were assessed. Inflammatory markers, oxidative stress and endothelial function surrogate markers, adhesion molecules, and parathormone and osteoprotegerin levels were measured.
Among traditional risk factors, only age, pre-transplantation diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were related to increased IMT and PWV, whereas PAT values were significantly decreased only in diabetics and patients with CVD and were similar in patients with and without LVH. In multivariate regression analysis, IMT was explained by age, previous CVD episodes, and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, and PWV by age and pre-transplantation diabetes. The regression analysis failed to find any significant explanatory variables for PAT.
除了终末期肾衰竭移植前期的加速性血管病变和内皮功能障碍外,关于影响肾移植受者血管损伤危险因素的证据有限。因此,我们进行了一项横断面研究,以评估传统、新型或潜在非传统危险因素在一组稳定肾移植受者血管和内皮功能障碍中的作用。
142例移植后8.4±1.8年的肾移植受者纳入本研究。评估了不同的血管损伤标志物,如颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)、脉搏波速度(PWV)和外周动脉张力测定(PAT)。测量了炎症标志物、氧化应激和内皮功能替代标志物、黏附分子以及甲状旁腺激素和骨保护素水平。
在传统危险因素中,只有年龄、移植前糖尿病、左心室肥厚(LVH)和心血管疾病(CVD)与IMT和PWV增加有关,而PAT值仅在糖尿病患者和CVD患者中显著降低,在有和没有LVH的患者中相似。在多变量回归分析中,IMT由年龄、既往CVD发作次数和较高的高敏C反应蛋白水平解释,PWV由年龄和移植前糖尿病解释。回归分析未发现PAT的任何显著解释变量。