Freeman Matthew C, Majorin Fiona, Boisson Sophie, Routray Parimita, Torondel Belen, Clasen Thomas
Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jul;110(7):386-92. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trw043.
Unsafe disposal of child faeces is persistent and may lead to considerable impact on the health of young children. Research is limited on the impact of sanitation or hygiene interventions to improve child faeces disposal practices.
In the context of a randomised controlled trial to assess the health impact of a programme in Odisha, India, to promote rural sanitation under the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign, we explored whether the intervention affected the safe disposal of faeces of children under-5 years of age.
At baseline, 1.1% of households practised 'safe' disposal of child faeces, either disposing it in a toilet or by burial. The intervention increased safe disposal of child faeces to 10.4% in intervention households, compared to 3.1% in the control households (RR 3.34; 95% CI 1.99-5.59). This increase in safe disposal is attributable to increases in latrine presence in the intervention communities; the intervention did not change safe disposal practices above and beyond the increase in latrine coverage.
The very modest increase in safe disposal, while statistically significant, is not likely to have consequential health benefit. To achieve open defecation free communities, sanitation interventions will need to develop behaviour change approaches to explicitly target safe disposal behaviours.
不安全的儿童粪便处理方式长期存在,可能对幼儿健康产生重大影响。关于改善儿童粪便处理行为的卫生或卫生干预措施的影响,研究有限。
在一项随机对照试验的背景下,该试验旨在评估印度奥里萨邦一项在印度政府全面卫生运动下促进农村卫生的计划对健康的影响,我们探讨了该干预措施是否影响了5岁以下儿童粪便的安全处理。
在基线时,1.1%的家庭对儿童粪便进行“安全”处理,即将其排入厕所或掩埋。干预措施使干预家庭中儿童粪便的安全处理率提高到10.4%,而对照家庭为3.1%(相对风险3.34;95%置信区间1.99 - 5.59)。安全处理率的提高归因于干预社区中厕所的增加;除了厕所覆盖率的增加之外,干预措施并未改变安全处理行为。
安全处理率虽有适度提高且具有统计学意义,但不太可能带来显著的健康益处。为实现无露天排便社区,卫生干预措施需要制定行为改变方法,以明确针对安全处理行为。