Suppr超能文献

非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗积极治疗的糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者的比较。

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with actively treated diabetes and multivessel coronary disease.

机构信息

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152(5):1321-1330.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.038. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a single-center analysis on short-term outcomes and long-term survival in actively treated diabetic patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

The final population consisted of 2450 patients with actively treated diabetes (mean age, 66 ± 9 years; female/male 545/1905, 22%). Of those, 1493 subjects were orally treated and 1011 subjects were taking insulin. Off-pump coronary artery bypass and on-pump coronary artery bypass were performed in 1253 and 1197 patients, respectively. Propensity score matching was used to compare the 2 matched groups.

RESULTS

When compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass, off-pump coronary artery bypass was associated with a significant risk reduction for postoperative cerebrovascular accident (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.99; P = .04), need for postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.77; P = .002), and reexploration for bleeding (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94; P = .02). Off-pump coronary artery bypass did not significantly affect early (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 0.73-2.40; P = .36) and late (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92-1.28; P = .32) mortality. However, off-pump coronary artery bypass with incomplete revascularization was associated with reduced survival when compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass with complete revascularization (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.34-2.46; P = .0002) and on-pump coronary artery bypass with complete revascularization (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.36-2.47; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass is a safe and feasible option for diabetic patients with multivessel disease, reduces the incidence of early complications including postoperative cerebrovascular events, and provides excellent long-term survival similar to on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in case of complete revascularization.

摘要

目的

我们对行非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pump coronary artery bypass,OPCAB)与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(on-pump coronary artery bypass,ONCAB)的积极治疗糖尿病患者的短期结局和长期生存进行了单中心分析。

方法

最终纳入了 2450 例积极治疗糖尿病患者(平均年龄 66±9 岁;女性/男性 545/1905,22%)。其中,1493 例接受口服药物治疗,1011 例接受胰岛素治疗。1253 例患者接受 OPCAB,1197 例患者接受 ONCAB。采用倾向评分匹配比较 2 个匹配组。

结果

与 ONCAB 相比,OPCAB 术后发生脑血管意外的风险显著降低(比值比,0.49;95%置信区间 [CI],0.25-0.99;P=0.04),需要术后主动脉内球囊反搏的风险降低(比值比,0.48;95%CI,0.30-0.77;P=0.002),需要再次探查出血的风险降低(比值比,0.55;95%CI,0.33-0.94;P=0.02)。OPCAB 对早期(风险比 [HR],1.32;95%CI,0.73-2.40;P=0.36)和晚期(HR,1.08;95%CI,0.92-1.28;P=0.32)死亡率无显著影响。然而,与完全血运重建的 OPCAB 相比,不完全血运重建的 OPCAB 与降低的生存率相关(HR,1.82;95%CI,1.34-2.46;P=0.0002),与完全血运重建的 ONCAB 相比(HR,1.83;95%CI,1.36-2.47;P<0.0001)。

结论

对于多支血管病变的糖尿病患者,OPCAB 是一种安全可行的选择,可降低术后脑血管事件等早期并发症的发生率,并在完全血运重建的情况下提供与 ONCAB 手术相似的优异长期生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验