1 Department of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
2 Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Brain. 2016 Dec;139(Pt 12):3063-3083. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww194. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
A growing number of studies approach the brain as a complex network, the so-called 'connectome'. Adopting this framework, we examine what types or extent of damage the brain can withstand-referred to as network 'robustness'-and conversely, which kind of distortions can be expected after brain lesions. To this end, we review computational lesion studies and empirical studies investigating network alterations in brain tumour, stroke and traumatic brain injury patients. Common to these three types of focal injury is that there is no unequivocal relationship between the anatomical lesion site and its topological characteristics within the brain network. Furthermore, large-scale network effects of these focal lesions are compared to those of a widely studied multifocal neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer's disease, in which central parts of the connectome are preferentially affected. Results indicate that human brain networks are remarkably resilient to different types of lesions, compared to other types of complex networks such as random or scale-free networks. However, lesion effects have been found to depend critically on the topological position of the lesion. In particular, damage to network hub regions-and especially those connecting different subnetworks-was found to cause the largest disturbances in network organization. Regardless of lesion location, evidence from empirical and computational lesion studies shows that lesions cause significant alterations in global network topology. The direction of these changes though remains to be elucidated. Encouragingly, both empirical and modelling studies have indicated that after focal damage, the connectome carries the potential to recover at least to some extent, with normalization of graph metrics being related to improved behavioural and cognitive functioning. To conclude, we highlight possible clinical implications of these findings, point out several methodological limitations that pertain to the study of brain diseases adopting a network approach, and provide suggestions for future research.
越来越多的研究将大脑视为一个复杂的网络,即所谓的“连接组”。采用这一框架,我们研究大脑能够承受多大程度的损伤——即所谓的网络“鲁棒性”——以及相反地,大脑损伤后会产生哪些类型的扭曲。为此,我们回顾了计算性损伤研究和实证研究,这些研究调查了脑肿瘤、中风和创伤性脑损伤患者的网络改变。这三种类型的局灶性损伤有一个共同点,即解剖损伤部位与其在大脑网络中的拓扑特征之间没有明确的关系。此外,还将这些局灶性损伤的大规模网络效应与一种广泛研究的多灶性神经退行性疾病——阿尔茨海默病——进行了比较,后者的连接组中央部分优先受到影响。结果表明,与其他类型的复杂网络(如随机网络或无标度网络)相比,人类大脑网络对不同类型的损伤具有显著的弹性。然而,损伤效应被发现严重依赖于损伤的拓扑位置。特别是,网络枢纽区域的损伤——特别是那些连接不同子网的区域的损伤——会导致网络组织的最大干扰。无论损伤位置如何,来自实证和计算损伤研究的证据都表明,损伤会导致全局网络拓扑的显著改变。不过,这些变化的方向仍有待阐明。令人鼓舞的是,实证和建模研究都表明,在局灶性损伤后,连接组至少在一定程度上具有恢复的潜力,图度量的正常化与行为和认知功能的改善有关。总之,我们强调了这些发现的可能临床意义,指出了采用网络方法研究脑疾病所涉及的几个方法学局限性,并为未来的研究提供了建议。