Lerman Daniel Alejandro, Alotti Nasri, Ume Kiddy Levente, Péault Bruno
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary Hospital of Edinburgh (NHS Lothian), University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine and College of Medicine and Veterinary, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Zala County Hospital, Pécs University, Hungary.
Eur Cardiol. 2016 Summer;11(1):43-48. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2016:8:1. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
Ischaemic heart disease is the predominant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; one million myocardial Infarctions occur per year in the USA, while more than five million patients suffer from chronic heart failure. Recently, heart failure has been singled out as an epidemic and is a staggering clinical and public health problem associated with significant mortality, morbidity and healthcare expenditures, particularly among those aged ≥65 years. Death rates have improved dramatically over the last four decades, but new approaches are nevertheless urgently needed for those patients who go on to develop ventricular dysfunction and chronic heart failure. Over the past decade, stem cell transplantation has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for acute or chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Multiple candidate cell types have been used in preclinical animal models and in humans to repair or regenerate the injured heart, either directly or indirectly (through paracrine effects), including: embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), neonatal cardiomyocytes, skeletal myoblasts (SKMs), endothelial progenitor cells, bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and, most recently, cardiac stem cells (CSCs). Although no consensus has emerged yet, the ideal cell type for the treatment of heart disease should: (a) improve heart function; (b) create healthy and functional cardiac muscle and vasculature, integrated into the host tissue; (c) be amenable to delivery by minimally invasive clinical methods; (d) be available 'off the shelf' as a standardised reagent; (e) be tolerated by the immune system; (f) be safe oncologically, i.e. not create tumours; and (g) circumvent societal ethical concerns. At present, it is not clear whether such a 'perfect' stem cell exists; what is apparent, however, is that some cell types are more promising than others. In this brief review, we provide ongoing data on agreement and controversy arising from clinical trials and touch upon the future directions of cell therapy for heart disease.
缺血性心脏病是心血管疾病发病和死亡的主要原因;在美国,每年有100万例心肌梗死发生,同时有超过500万患者患有慢性心力衰竭。最近,心力衰竭已被视为一种流行病,是一个令人震惊的临床和公共卫生问题,与高死亡率、发病率及医疗费用相关,尤其是在65岁及以上人群中。在过去的四十年里,死亡率有了显著改善,但对于那些继而发展为心室功能障碍和慢性心力衰竭的患者,仍然迫切需要新的治疗方法。在过去十年中,干细胞移植已成为治疗急性或慢性缺血性心肌病的一种有前景的治疗策略。多种候选细胞类型已被用于临床前动物模型和人体,以直接或间接(通过旁分泌作用)修复或再生受损心脏,包括:胚胎干细胞(ESC)、诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)、新生儿心肌细胞、骨骼肌成肌细胞(SKM)、内皮祖细胞、骨髓单个核细胞(BMMNC)、间充质干细胞(MSC),以及最近的心脏干细胞(CSC)。尽管尚未达成共识,但治疗心脏病的理想细胞类型应具备以下特点:(a)改善心脏功能;(b)形成健康且功能正常的心肌和血管,并整合到宿主组织中;(c)适合通过微创临床方法进行递送;(d)作为标准化试剂可“现货供应”;(e)能被免疫系统耐受;(f)在肿瘤学上是安全的,即不会产生肿瘤;(g)避免社会伦理问题。目前,尚不清楚是否存在这样一种“完美”的干细胞;然而,显而易见的是,某些细胞类型比其他类型更具前景。在这篇简短的综述中,我们提供了来自临床试验的有关共识和争议的最新数据,并探讨了心脏病细胞治疗的未来方向。