• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死的干细胞治疗

Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Clifford David M, Fisher Sheila A, Brunskill Susan J, Doree Carolyn, Mathur Anthony, Watt Suzanne, Martin-Rendon Enca

机构信息

StemCell Research Lab, NuffieldDepartment of ClinicalLaboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD006536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub3.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub3
PMID:22336818
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stem cell therapy offers a promising approach to the regeneration of damaged vascular and cardiac tissue after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This has resulted in multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

To critically evaluate evidence from RCTs on the effectiveness of adult bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSC) to treat acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

SEARCH METHODS

This Cochrane review is an update of a previous one (published in 2008). MEDLINE (1950 to January 2011), EMBASE (1974 to January 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 1, 2011), CINAHL (1982 to January 2011) and the Transfusion Evidence Library (1980 to January 2011) were searched. In addition, several international and ongoing trial databases were searched and handsearching of relevant conference proceedings undertaken to January 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing autologous stem/progenitor cells with no autologous stem/progenitor cells in patients diagnosed with AMI were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened all references, assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model were conducted and heterogeneity was explored for the primary outcome using sub-group analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three RCTs (1765 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Stem/progenitor cell treatment was not associated with statistically significant changes in the incidence of mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.21) or morbidity (the latter measured by re-infarction, hospital re-admission, restenosis and target vessel revascularisation). A considerably high degree of heterogeneity has been observed among the included trials. In short-term follow up, stem cell treatment was observed to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly (WMD 2.87, 95% CI 2.00 to 3.73). This improvement in LVEF was maintained over long-term follow up of 12 to 61 months (WMD 3.75, 95% CI 2.57 to 4.93). With certain measurements and at certain times, stem cell treatment was observed to reduce left ventricular end systolic and end diastolic volumes (LVESV & LVEDV) and infarct size significantly in long-term follow up. There was a positive correlation between mononuclear cell dose infused and the effect on LVEF measured by magnetic resonance imaging. A correlation between timing of stem cell treatment and effect on LVEF measured by left ventricular angiography was also observed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high degree of heterogeneity observed, the results of this systematic review suggest that moderate improvement in global heart function is significant and sustained long-term. However, because mortality rates after successful revascularization of the culprit arteries are very low, larger number of participants would be required to assess the full clinical effect of this treatment. Standardisation of methodology, cell dosing and cell product formulation, timing of cell transplantation and patient selection may also be required in order to reduce the substantial heterogeneity observed among the included studies.

摘要

背景

干细胞疗法为急性心肌梗死(AMI)后受损血管和心脏组织的再生提供了一种有前景的方法。这在全球范围内引发了多项随机对照试验(RCT)。

目的

严格评估RCT关于成人骨髓来源干细胞(BMSC)治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)有效性的证据。

检索方法

本Cochrane系统评价是对之前一篇(2008年发表)的更新。检索了MEDLINE(1950年至2011年1月)、EMBASE(1974年至2011年1月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(2011年第1期)、CINAHL(1982年至2011年1月)和输血证据库(1980年至2011年1月)。此外,检索了几个国际和正在进行的试验数据库,并对相关会议论文集进行了手工检索至2011年1月。

入选标准

诊断为AMI的患者中,比较自体干细胞/祖细胞与非自体干细胞/祖细胞的RCT符合要求。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立筛选所有参考文献,评估试验质量并提取数据。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析,并使用亚组分析探讨主要结局的异质性。

主要结果

33项RCT(1765名参与者)符合纳入标准。干细胞/祖细胞治疗与死亡率(RR 0.70,9%CI 0.40至1.21)或发病率(后者通过再梗死、再次入院、再狭窄和靶血管血运重建来衡量)的统计学显著变化无关。在所纳入的试验中观察到相当高程度的异质性。在短期随访中,观察到干细胞治疗可显著改善左心室射血分数(LVEF)(加权均数差2.87,95%CI 2.00至3.73)。这种LVEF的改善在12至61个月的长期随访中得以维持(加权均数差3.75,95%CI 2.57至4.93)。在长期随访中,在某些测量和特定时间,观察到干细胞治疗可显著降低左心室收缩末期和舒张末期容积(LVESV和LVEDV)以及梗死面积。注入的单核细胞剂量与磁共振成像测量的对LVEF的影响之间存在正相关。还观察到干细胞治疗时机与左心室血管造影测量的对LVEF的影响之间存在相关性。

作者结论

尽管观察到高度异质性,但本系统评价的结果表明,整体心脏功能的适度改善是显著且长期持续的。然而,由于罪犯血管成功血运重建后的死亡率非常低,需要更多参与者来评估这种治疗的全部临床效果。为了减少所纳入研究中观察到的显著异质性,可能还需要在方法学、细胞剂量和细胞制品配方、细胞移植时机以及患者选择方面进行标准化。

相似文献

1
Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死的干细胞治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD006536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub3.
2
Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死的干细胞治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD006536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub2.
3
Stem cell therapy for chronic ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure.用于慢性缺血性心脏病和充血性心力衰竭的干细胞疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 24;12(12):CD007888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007888.pub3.
4
Prophylactic platelet transfusion for prevention of bleeding in patients with haematological disorders after chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.预防性血小板输注用于预防血液系统疾病患者化疗和干细胞移植后的出血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD004269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004269.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.冠心病管理中的患者教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD008895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008895.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3.
10
Antioxidants for female subfertility.用于女性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD007807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events, infarct size and LV ejection fraction assessed by CMRI.干细胞疗法在急性心肌梗死中的安全性和有效性:一项关于通过心脏磁共振成像评估不良事件、梗死面积和左心室射血分数的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2025 Jun 27;12(1):e003301. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003301.
2
Therapeutic potential of exosomes derived from human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells for heart tissue regeneration after myocardial infarction.人子宫内膜间充质干细胞来源的外泌体对心肌梗死后心脏组织再生的治疗潜力。
Regen Ther. 2025 Feb 1;28:451-461. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.01.007. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Exosomes derived from TNF-α-treated bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate myocardial infarction injury in mice.
TNF-α 处理的骨髓间充质干细胞来源的外泌体可改善小鼠心肌梗死损伤。
Organogenesis. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2356341. doi: 10.1080/15476278.2024.2356341. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote the M2 Phenotype in Macrophages Derived from STEMI Patients.人骨髓间充质干细胞促进来源于 STEMI 患者的巨噬细胞的 M2 表型。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 13;24(22):16257. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216257.
5
Advances in the design, generation, and application of tissue-engineered myocardial equivalents.组织工程心肌替代物在设计、生成及应用方面的进展
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Sep 22;11:1247572. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1247572. eCollection 2023.
6
Inhibition of Gap Junction Formation Prior to Implantation of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Cells Improves Function in the Ischemic Myocardium.在骨髓间充质细胞植入前抑制缝隙连接形成可改善缺血心肌功能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 2;24(11):9653. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119653.
7
Preclinical Large Animal Porcine Models for Cardiac Regeneration and Its Clinical Translation: Role of hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes.临床前大型动物猪模型在心脏再生及其临床转化中的应用:人诱导多能干细胞衍生心肌细胞的作用。
Cells. 2023 Apr 5;12(7):1090. doi: 10.3390/cells12071090.
8
and toxicological evaluation of carbon quantum dots originating from .以及源自……的碳量子点的毒理学评估。 (原句不完整,翻译可能不太准确,你可补充完整原文以便更精准翻译)
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 2;9(2):e13422. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13422. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Cell-Based and Selected Cell-Free Therapies for Myocardial Infarction: How Do They Compare to the Current Treatment Options?基于细胞和无细胞的心肌梗死治疗方法:它们与当前的治疗选择相比如何?
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 7;23(18):10314. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810314.
10
The Progress of Stem Cell Therapy in Myocardial-Infarcted Heart Regeneration: Cell Sheet Technology.干细胞治疗在心肌梗死心脏再生中的进展:细胞片层技术。
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2022 Oct;19(5):969-986. doi: 10.1007/s13770-022-00467-z. Epub 2022 Jul 20.