Traber Juerg, Held Ulrike, Signer Maria, Huebner Tobias, Arndt Stefan, Neff Thomas A
Department of Surgery, Venenklinik Bellevue, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.
Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Int Wound J. 2017 Aug;14(4):606-615. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12652. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
Chronic foot and leg ulcers are a common health problem worldwide. A mainstay of chronic ulcer therapy is sharp mechanical wound debridement requiring potent analgesia. In this prospective, controlled, single-centre, crossover design study, patients were assigned to either the administration of topical analgesia with 5% lidocaine/prilocaine cream or the inhalation of an analgesic 50% N O/O gas premix. Primary outcome parameter was level of pain at maximum wound depth during debridement as measured by a visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included level of pain after debridement, overall duration of treatment session, duration and completeness of debridement, and the patient's subjective perception of analgesic quality during debridement. Pain level increased from 0·60/0·94 (first/second debridement; baseline) to 1·76/2·50 (debridement) with 5% lidocaine/prilocaine and from 1·00/1·35 (baseline) to 3·95/3·29 (debridement) with 50% N O/O gas premix. Patient satisfaction was 90·48%/94·44% (first/second debridement) with topical 5% lidocaine/prilocaine analgesia and 90·48%/76·47% with the inhalation of 50% N O/O gas premix. Debridement was completed in a significantly higher percentage of 85·71%/88·89% (first/second debridement) with 5% lidocaine/prilocaine than with 50% N O/O gas premix (42·86%/58·82%) (odds ratio 6·7; P = 0·001). This study provides sound evidence that analgesia with topically administered 5% lidocaine/prilocaine cream is superior to the use of inhaled 50% N O/O gas premix in chronic leg ulcer debridement.
慢性足腿部溃疡是全球常见的健康问题。慢性溃疡治疗的主要手段是锐利机械性伤口清创术,这需要有效的镇痛措施。在这项前瞻性、对照、单中心、交叉设计研究中,患者被分配接受5%利多卡因/丙胺卡因乳膏局部镇痛或吸入50%氧化亚氮/氧气混合镇痛气体。主要结局参数是清创过程中伤口最深时的疼痛程度,采用视觉模拟评分法测量。次要结局包括清创后疼痛程度、治疗总时长、清创时长和清创完整性,以及患者在清创过程中对镇痛质量的主观感受。使用5%利多卡因/丙胺卡因时,疼痛程度从0·60/0·94(首次/第二次清创;基线)增至1·76/2·50(清创时),使用50%氧化亚氮/氧气混合气体时,疼痛程度从1·00/1·35(基线)增至3·95/3·29(清创时)。5%利多卡因/丙胺卡因局部镇痛时患者满意度为90·48%/94·44%(首次/第二次清创),吸入50%氧化亚氮/氧气混合气体时患者满意度为90·48%/76·47%。使用5%利多卡因/丙胺卡因完成清创的比例显著高于使用50%氧化亚氮/氧气混合气体,分别为85·71%/88·89%(首次/第二次清创)和42·86%/58·82%(优势比6·7;P = 0·001)。本研究提供了充分证据,表明在慢性腿部溃疡清创中,局部应用5%利多卡因/丙胺卡因乳膏镇痛优于吸入50%氧化亚氮/氧气混合气体。