Kallio Merja, Koskela Ulla, Peltoniemi Outi, Kontiokari Tero, Pokka Tytti, Suo-Palosaari Maria, Saarela Timo
PEDEGO Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, BOX 5000, FIN-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Sep;175(9):1175-1183. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2758-y. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient-ventilator synchrony during invasive ventilation and leads to lower peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) and oxygen requirements. The aim of this trial was to compare NAVA with current standard ventilation in preterm infants in terms of the duration of invasive ventilation. Sixty infants born between 28 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and requiring invasive ventilation due to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were randomized to conventional ventilation or NAVA. The median durations of invasive ventilation were 34.7 h (quartiles 22.8-67.9 h) and 25.8 h (15.6-52.1 h) in the NAVA and control groups, respectively (P = 0.21). Lower PIPs were achieved with NAVA (P = 0.02), and the rapid reduction in PIP after changing the ventilation mode to NAVA made following the predetermined extubation criteria challenging. The other ventilatory and vital parameters did not differ between the groups. Frequent apneas and persistent pulmonary hypertension were conditions that limited the use of NAVA in 17 % of the patients randomized to the NAVA group. Similar cumulative doses of opiates were used in both groups (P = 0.71).
NAVA was a safe and feasible ventilation mode for the majority of preterm infants suffering from RDS, but the traditional extubation criteria were not clinically applicable during NAVA.
• NAVA improves patient-ventilator synchrony during invasive ventilation. • Lower airway pressures and oxygen requirements are achieved with NAVA during invasive ventilation in preterm infants by comparison with conventional ventilation. What is new: • Infants suffering from PPHN did not tolerate NAVA in the acute phase of their illness. • The traditional extubation criteria relying on inspiratory pressures and spontaneous breathing efforts were not clinically applicable during NAVA.
神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)可改善有创通气期间的患者 - 呼吸机同步性,并降低吸气峰压(PIP)和氧需求。本试验的目的是比较NAVA与当前标准通气在早产儿有创通气持续时间方面的差异。60例胎龄在28 + 0至36 + 6周之间、因新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)需要有创通气的婴儿被随机分为传统通气组或NAVA组。NAVA组和对照组有创通气的中位持续时间分别为34.7小时(四分位数间距22.8 - 67.9小时)和25.8小时(15.6 - 52.1小时)(P = 0.21)。NAVA可实现更低的PIP(P = 0.02),且在将通气模式改为NAVA后PIP迅速降低,这使得遵循预定的拔管标准具有挑战性。两组的其他通气和生命参数无差异。频繁呼吸暂停和持续性肺动脉高压是导致17%随机分配到NAVA组的患者限制使用NAVA的情况。两组使用的阿片类药物累积剂量相似(P = 0.71)。
对于大多数患有RDS的早产儿,NAVA是一种安全可行的通气模式,但在NAVA期间传统的拔管标准在临床上不适用。
• NAVA可改善有创通气期间的患者 - 呼吸机同步性。• 与传统通气相比,NAVA在早产儿有创通气期间可实现更低的气道压力和氧需求。新发现:• 患有持续性肺动脉高压的婴儿在疾病急性期不耐受NAVA。• 在NAVA期间,依赖吸气压力和自主呼吸努力的传统拔管标准在临床上不适用。