• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声造影对乳腺病变鉴别诊断的价值:一项Meta分析

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ma Xuelei, Liu Rongjun, Zhu Chenjing, Zhang Jing, Ling Wenwu

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, Chengdu, China

West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Oct;35(10):2095-102. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.10005. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

DOI:10.7863/ultra.15.10005
PMID:27503752
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.

METHODS

The scientific literature databases PubMed and Embase were comprehensively searched for relevant studies before January 2015. Data were pooled to yield the summary sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio using meta-analysis software.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with 2296 lesions were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.90; inconsistency index [I(2)] = 77.9%) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83; I(2) = 84.0%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 30.35 (95% CI, 15.75-58.48; I(2)= 82.1%), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9115 (SE, 0.0243).

CONCLUSIONS

The comprehensive results suggest that contrast-enhanced sonography could be a potentially effective method for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统评价和评估超声造影在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的诊断准确性。

方法

全面检索科学文献数据库PubMed和Embase,查找2015年1月之前的相关研究。使用荟萃分析软件汇总数据,得出汇总敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比。

结果

共有29项研究、2296个病灶纳入分析。汇总敏感性和特异性分别为0.88(95%置信区间[CI],0.86 - 0.90;不一致指数[I(2)] = 77.9%)和0.80(95% CI,0.78 - 0.83;I(2) = 84.0%)。汇总诊断比值比为30.35(95% CI,15.75 - 58.48;I(2)= 82.1%),汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.9115(标准误,0.0243)。

结论

综合结果表明,超声造影可能是乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断的一种潜在有效方法。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.超声造影对乳腺病变鉴别诊断的价值:一项Meta分析
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Oct;35(10):2095-102. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.10005. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
2
Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.用于定量分析的感兴趣区域绘制优化:超声造影鉴别乳腺良恶性病变
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Nov;34(11):1969-76. doi: 10.7863/ultra.14.10042. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
3
Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.超声造影鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的Meta分析
Acta Radiol. 2015 Jan;56(1):25-33. doi: 10.1177/0284185113517115. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
4
Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.超声造影对卵巢癌的诊断性能:一项荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Apr;41(4):967-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
5
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography With SonoVue in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.超声造影 SonoVue 对鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的诊断价值:Meta 分析。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820971583. doi: 10.1177/1533033820971583.
6
Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.超声引导下漫射光学断层扫描用于鉴别乳腺良恶性病变:一项Meta分析
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Mar;36(3):485-492. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.03063. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
7
Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.超声造影联合定性及定量分析诊断乳腺病变的效能:与磁共振成像的对比研究。
J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Oct;32(10):1805-14. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.10.1805.
8
Does adding diffuse optical tomography to sonography improve differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions? Observer performance study.将扩散光学断层扫描添加到超声检查中是否能改善乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别?观察者性能研究。
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 May;34(5):749-57. doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.5.749.
9
Meta-Analysis: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Conventional Ultrasound for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.荟萃分析:对比增强超声与传统超声在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的应用
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 May;44(5):919-929. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Breast Lesions: Quantitative Diagnosis Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography-A Systematic Review and Meta--Analysis.乳腺病变:使用超声剪切波弹性成像的定量诊断——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Apr;42(4):835-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.10.024. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla using contrast enhanced ultrasonography.采用超声造影评估临床腋窝阴性乳腺癌患者的腋窝淋巴结。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug 7;22(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03419-0.
2
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography With SonoVue in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.超声造影 SonoVue 对鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的诊断价值:Meta 分析。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820971583. doi: 10.1177/1533033820971583.
3
Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for breast lesions of different sizes: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.
不同大小乳腺病变超声造影诊断效能的对比研究:与磁共振成像的对照研究。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Jun;93(1110):20190932. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190932. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
4
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Breast Masses: Adjunct Tool to Decrease the Number of False-Positive Biopsy Results.乳腺肿块的超声造影检查:降低假阳性活检结果数量的辅助工具。
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Sep;38(9):2259-2273. doi: 10.1002/jum.14917. Epub 2018 Dec 31.