• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用多学科焦点小组为mI SMART的开发提供信息:一项由护士主导的针对多种慢性病的技术干预措施。

Using Multidisciplinary Focus Groups to Inform the Development of mI SMART: A Nurse-Led Technology Intervention for Multiple Chronic Conditions.

作者信息

Mallow Jennifer A, Theeke Laurie A, Theeke Elliott, Mallow Brian K

机构信息

School of Nursing, West Virginia University, 9620 HSC South, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.

Sovern Run, LLC, 210 Cardinal Lane, Albright, WV 26519, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res Pract. 2016;2016:7416728. doi: 10.1155/2016/7416728. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1155/2016/7416728
PMID:27504199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4967683/
Abstract

Used as integrated tools, technology may improve the ability of healthcare providers to improve access and outcomes of care. Little is known about healthcare teams' preferences in using such technology. This paper reports the findings from focus groups aimed at evaluating a newly developed primary care technology platform. Focus groups were completed in academic, outpatient, and community settings. Focus groups were attended by 37 individuals. The participants included professionals from multiple disciplines. Both prescribing (N = 8) and nonprescribing healthcare team members (n = 21) completed the focus groups and survey. The majority were practicing for more than 20 years (44.8%) in an outpatient clinic (62%) for 20-40 hours per week (37.9%). Providers identified perceived obstacles of patient use as ability, willingness, and time. System obstacles were identified as lack of integration, lack of reimbursement, and cost. The positive attributes of the developed system were capability for virtual visits, readability, connectivity, user-friendliness, ability to capture biophysical measures, enhanced patient access, and incorporation of multiple technologies. Providers suggested increasing capability for biophysical and symptom monitoring for more common chronic conditions. Technology interventions have the potential to improve access and outcomes but will not be successful without the input of users.

摘要

作为集成工具使用时,技术可以提高医疗服务提供者改善医疗服务可及性和治疗效果的能力。对于医疗团队使用此类技术的偏好,我们知之甚少。本文报告了旨在评估一个新开发的初级保健技术平台的焦点小组的研究结果。焦点小组在学术、门诊和社区环境中完成。37人参加了焦点小组。参与者包括来自多个学科的专业人员。开处方的医疗团队成员(N = 8)和不开处方的医疗团队成员(n = 21)都完成了焦点小组讨论和调查。大多数人在门诊诊所工作超过20年(44.8%),每周工作20 - 40小时(37.9%),占比62%。提供者将患者使用的感知障碍确定为能力、意愿和时间。系统障碍被确定为缺乏整合、缺乏报销和成本。所开发系统的积极属性包括虚拟就诊能力、可读性、连通性、用户友好性、捕获生物物理指标的能力、增强患者可及性以及多种技术的整合。提供者建议提高对更常见慢性病的生物物理和症状监测能力。技术干预有改善可及性和治疗效果的潜力,但没有用户的参与将不会成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f596/4967683/523e9314d153/NRP2016-7416728.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f596/4967683/0db5a1a42fb2/NRP2016-7416728.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f596/4967683/f3e93ab056db/NRP2016-7416728.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f596/4967683/523e9314d153/NRP2016-7416728.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f596/4967683/0db5a1a42fb2/NRP2016-7416728.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f596/4967683/f3e93ab056db/NRP2016-7416728.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f596/4967683/523e9314d153/NRP2016-7416728.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Multidisciplinary Focus Groups to Inform the Development of mI SMART: A Nurse-Led Technology Intervention for Multiple Chronic Conditions.运用多学科焦点小组为mI SMART的开发提供信息:一项由护士主导的针对多种慢性病的技术干预措施。
Nurs Res Pract. 2016;2016:7416728. doi: 10.1155/2016/7416728. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Study protocol: mobile improvement of self-management ability through rural technology (mI SMART).研究方案:通过农村技术实现自我管理能力的移动改善(mI SMART)
Springerplus. 2015 Aug 16;4:423. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1209-y. eCollection 2015.
4
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
5
6
7
The effectiveness of mI SMART: A nurse practitioner led technology intervention for multiple chronic conditions in primary care.mI SMART的有效性:一项由执业护士主导的针对初级保健中多种慢性病的技术干预措施。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Mar 31;5(2):131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.03.009. eCollection 2018 Apr 10.
8
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
A Cloud-Based Virtual Outpatient Clinic for Patient-Centered Care: Proof-of-Concept Study.基于云的以患者为中心的虚拟门诊诊所:概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 24;20(9):e10135. doi: 10.2196/10135.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Outcomes Related to Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Primary Care for Multiple Chronic Conditions.护士从业者提供的多种慢性病初级保健相关结局的系统评价
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Dec;80(6):563-581. doi: 10.1177/10775587231186720. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
2
Designing a multifaceted telehealth intervention for a rural population using a model for developing complex interventions in nursing.运用护理领域复杂干预措施开发模型,为农村人口设计多方面的远程医疗干预措施。
BMC Nurs. 2020 Feb 4;19:9. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-0400-9. eCollection 2020.
3
The effectiveness of mI SMART: A nurse practitioner led technology intervention for multiple chronic conditions in primary care.

本文引用的文献

1
Study protocol: mobile improvement of self-management ability through rural technology (mI SMART).研究方案:通过农村技术实现自我管理能力的移动改善(mI SMART)
Springerplus. 2015 Aug 16;4:423. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1209-y. eCollection 2015.
2
Using mHealth Tools to Improve Rural Diabetes Care Guided by the Chronic Care Model.在慢性病照护模式指导下使用移动健康工具改善农村糖尿病护理
Online J Rural Nurs Health Care. 2014;14(1):43-65. doi: 10.14574/ojrnhc.v14i1.276.
3
Aligning health information technologies with effective service delivery models to improve chronic disease care.
mI SMART的有效性:一项由执业护士主导的针对初级保健中多种慢性病的技术干预措施。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Mar 31;5(2):131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.03.009. eCollection 2018 Apr 10.
4
Models of collaboration and dissemination for nursing informatics innovations in the 21st century.21 世纪护理信息学创新的协作和传播模式。
Nurs Outlook. 2019 Jul-Aug;67(4):419-432. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
5
Behavioral Interventions Using Consumer Information Technology as Tools to Advance Health Equity.利用消费者信息技术的行为干预措施,促进健康公平。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S79-S85. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304646.
使健康信息技术与有效的服务提供模式相结合,以改善慢性病护理。
Prev Med. 2014 Sep;66:167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
4
Developing complex interventions for nursing: a critical review of key guidelines.发展护理复杂干预措施:关键指南的批判性回顾。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Sep;22(17-18):2366-86. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12173. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
5
Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.长期病患者的远程医疗的成本效益(全系统示范远程医疗问卷调查研究):在一项实用的、集群随机对照试验中嵌套的经济评估。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 20;346:f1035. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1035.
6
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.定性研究。引入焦点小组。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.