• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性研究。引入焦点小组。

Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

作者信息

Kitzinger J

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Glasgow.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
PMID:7633241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2550365/
Abstract

This paper introduces focus group methodology, gives advice on group composition, running the groups, and analysing the results. Focus groups have advantages for researchers in the field of health and medicine: they do not discriminate against people who cannot read or write and they can encourage participation from people reluctant to be interviewed on their own or who feel they have nothing to say.

摘要

本文介绍了焦点小组方法，并就小组构成、小组运作及结果分析提供了建议。焦点小组对健康与医学领域的研究人员具有优势：它们不会歧视不识字或不会写字的人，并且能够鼓励那些不愿单独接受访谈或觉得自己没什么可说的人参与进来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2704/2550365/70bdff2eb335/bmj00603-0033-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2704/2550365/70bdff2eb335/bmj00603-0033-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2704/2550365/70bdff2eb335/bmj00603-0033-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.定性研究。引入焦点小组。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
2
Focus groups.焦点小组
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499.
3
Using focus groups in disability research.在残疾研究中运用焦点小组。
Qual Health Res. 2007 May;17(5):690-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732307301488.
4
The appropriateness and use of focus group methodology across international mental health communities.焦点小组方法在国际心理健康社区中的适用性与应用情况。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2004 Feb-May;16(1-2):24-30. doi: 10.1080/09540260310001635078.
5
Focus group interviews in health-care research.医疗保健研究中的焦点小组访谈。
Prof Nurse. 1999 Mar;14(6):395-7.
6
User focus groups and Best Value in services for people with learning disabilities.用户焦点小组与为学习障碍者提供的最佳服务价值。
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Nov;9(6):476-89. doi: 10.1046/j.0966-0410.2001.00328.x.
7
Focus group interviews part 3: analysis.焦点小组访谈 第3部分：分析
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(5):266-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.5.266.
8
Survived so what? Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit.患儿从儿科重症监护病房出院后，他们和家庭的优先研究重点是什么？
Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Mar;23(2):68-74. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12298. Epub 2017 May 17.
9
[Use of focus group interviews in health science].[焦点小组访谈在健康科学中的应用]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2012 May 7;174(19):1298-302.
10
Conducting focus groups for health research among Asian communities: insights and experiences.在亚洲社区开展健康研究焦点小组：见解与经验
Ethn Dis. 2001 Autumn;11(3):438-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Experience of Virtual Hospital Care Provided by a Multidisciplinary Team: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.多学科团队提供的虚拟医院护理的患者体验：一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 15;14:e72729. doi: 10.2196/72729.
2
Perceived importance of tailored education to prevent second victim phenomenon in clinical pharmacy practice: a focus group study with community pharmacists.量身定制教育对预防临床药学实践中“二次受害者”现象的重要性认知：一项针对社区药剂师的焦点小组研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01987-z.
3
"Just put in a little more effort": the help-seeking experience of patients living with obesity.

本文引用的文献

1
A study of breast cancer detection practices and beliefs in black women attending public health clinics.一项针对在公共卫生诊所就诊的黑人女性乳腺癌检测实践与信念的研究。
Health Educ Res. 1994 Sep;9(3):331-42. doi: 10.1093/her/9.3.331.
2
Identifying and treating wife abuse.识别与治疗对妻子的虐待行为。
J Fam Pract. 1993 Feb;36(2):185-91.
3
Listening to local voices: adapting rapid appraisal to assess health and social needs in general practice.倾听当地声音：调整快速评估以评估全科医疗中的健康和社会需求。
“再稍微努力一点”：肥胖症患者的求助经历
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01867-6.
4
Innovation adoption, use and implementation in emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间急诊科创新的采用、使用及实施情况
BMJ Innov. 2024 Jul;10(3):51-59. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001206. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
5
Bridging the digital divide for people with aphasia: a study protocol for codesigning web accessibility tools and guidelines.弥合失语症患者的数字鸿沟：一项关于共同设计网络可及性工具和指南的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e099273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099273.
6
Facilitators and barriers to implementing and sustaining facility-based stillbirth reviews in India: a qualitative study.印度实施和维持基于机构的死产审查的促进因素和障碍：一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07912-6.
7
Design and validation of an energy level diary for fatigue management in patients with post-COVID syndrome.新冠后综合征患者疲劳管理能量水平日记的设计与验证
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jul 21;6:1633466. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1633466. eCollection 2025.
8
Exploring Knowledge and Perceptions of Menopause Among Peri-Menopausal Women in Greece: Insights into the Role of Mobile Applications in Menopausal Management.探索希腊围绝经期女性对更年期的认知与看法：洞察移动应用程序在更年期管理中的作用
Cureus. 2025 Jun 19;17(6):e86397. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86397. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Female genital schistosomiasis in Ghana: An exploration of knowledge, attitudes, and practice among women of reproductive age.加纳的女性生殖系统血吸虫病：对育龄妇女知识、态度和行为的探索。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Jun 26;10:100632. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100632. eCollection 2025 Dec.
10
Co-Design of a Health Screening Program Fact Sheet by People Experiencing Homelessness and ChatGPT: Focus Group Study.无家可归者与ChatGPT共同设计健康筛查项目情况说明书：焦点小组研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 4;9:e68316. doi: 10.2196/68316.
BMJ. 1994 Mar 12;308(6930):698-700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6930.698.
4
Narratives of birth and the postpartum: analysis of the focus group responses of new mothers.分娩及产后经历：初为人母者焦点小组回应分析
Birth. 1993 Dec;20(4):204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1993.tb00228.x.
5
Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening.跨文化咨询：对阻碍非英语母语女性前往全科医生处进行宫颈癌筛查的因素进行调查。
BMJ. 1994 Oct 29;309(6962):1126-8.
6
Qualitative interviews in medical research.医学研究中的定性访谈
BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251.
7
Rigour and qualitative research.严谨性与定性研究。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.
8
Assessing the acceptability of NORPLANT implants in four countries: findings from focus group research.评估四个国家中诺普兰植入剂的可接受性：焦点小组研究结果
Stud Fam Plann. 1990 Mar-Apr;21(2):92-103.
9
The smear test: women's views.涂片检查：女性的观点。
Nurs Stand. 1991;5(33):32-6. doi: 10.7748/ns.5.33.32.s41.
10
Influences on adolescent sexuality in Nigeria and Kenya: findings from recent focus-group discussions.尼日利亚和肯尼亚青少年性行为的影响因素：近期焦点小组讨论的结果
Stud Fam Plann. 1992 May-Jun;23(3):199-210.