Burgess Alexandra M, DiBartolo Patricia Marten, Rendón María Jose
Department of Psychology, Smith College.
Department of Psychology, University of Miami.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jul;29(7):857-867. doi: 10.1037/pas0000374. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
Although culture-based measurement bias threatens the validity of intergroup comparison research, measurement invariance is often assumed rather than demonstrated by researchers who draw conclusions about cross-cultural similarities or differences. The current article investigates the cross-cultural invariance of a popular measure of perfectionism, the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (F-MPS; Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990) for a Hispanic/Latina sample. Perfectionism, which encompasses high goal setting and sensitivity to critical evaluation, is a transdiagnostic risk factor for internalizing psychopathology that especially warrants focus among groups burdened by mental health disparities. Multiple samples were used in a series of analyses to construct a baseline first-order measurement model and test for cross-group equivalence. For model development, confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were used with 320 female participants (M = 19.61 years) who identified primarily (n = 301) as European/European American. Measurement invariance testing was conducted with multigroup CFAs using another sample of female adults (n = 574; Mage = 21.21 years), identifying either as European/European American (n = 217) or Hispanic/Latina/Latin American (n = 357). Evidence was found for invariance across the revised F-MPS factor structure, pattern of factor loadings, and factor variances/covariances. Results indicate that predictive relationships may be compared across these groups, but caution is suggested when interpreting raw mean score differences due to intercept nonequivalence. Further, second-order model testing demonstrated support for the bidimensional model of perfectionism cross-culturally. Future research on perfectionism within the Latino/a population is encouraged using this equivalent item set. (PsycINFO Database Record
尽管基于文化的测量偏差会威胁到群体间比较研究的有效性,但进行跨文化异同结论推导的研究者往往只是假定而非证明测量不变性。本文针对西班牙裔/拉丁裔样本,研究了一种常用的完美主义测量工具——弗罗斯特多维完美主义量表(F-MPS;弗罗斯特、马滕、拉哈特和罗森布拉特,1990)的跨文化不变性。完美主义包括高目标设定和对批判性评价的敏感,是内化心理病理学的一个跨诊断风险因素,在受心理健康差异困扰的群体中尤其值得关注。在一系列分析中使用了多个样本,以构建基线一阶测量模型并检验跨组等效性。在模型开发过程中,对320名主要认定为欧洲裔/欧裔美国人(n = 301)的女性参与者(M = 19.61岁)进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)。使用另一组成年女性样本(n = 574;年龄中位数 = 21.21岁)进行多组CFA测量不变性测试,这些女性参与者要么认定为欧洲裔/欧裔美国人(n = 217),要么认定为西班牙裔/拉丁裔/拉丁美洲人(n = 357)。研究发现,修订后的F-MPS因子结构、因子载荷模式以及因子方差/协方差具有不变性。结果表明,可以在这些群体之间比较预测关系,但由于截距不等效,在解释原始平均分差异时需谨慎。此外,二阶模型测试表明了跨文化对完美主义二维模型的支持。鼓励在拉丁裔人群中使用这套等效项目集开展关于完美主义的未来研究。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》