• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨颈骨合成的稳定性。尸体中固定方法的比较。

Stability of femoral neck osteosynthesis. Comparison of fixation methods in cadavers.

作者信息

Husby T, Alho A, Rønningen H

机构信息

University of Oslo, Ullevål Hospital, Orthopedic Service, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Scand. 1989 Jun;60(3):299-302. doi: 10.3109/17453678909149281.

DOI:10.3109/17453678909149281
PMID:2750503
Abstract

Fixation of vertical femoral neck osteotomies in 50 cadavers was performed with either von Bahr screws or a sliding hip compression screw. One specimen from each pair of femora was used for the osteotomy, the other serving as an intact control. At 0.05 r of torsion the load-deformation test showed that three von Bahr screws provided the strongest fixation, and this was confirmed by the the ultimate torsional moment test. Regardless of positioning, even two von Bahr screws were stronger than the sliding compression screw with or without an additional lag screw. The results indicate that the best torsional stability in femoral neck fractures can be obtained with three 5.5-mm screws.

摘要

在50具尸体上,使用冯·巴尔螺钉或滑动髋部加压螺钉对股骨颈垂直截骨进行固定。每对股骨中的一个标本用于截骨,另一个作为完整对照。在0.05r扭转时,载荷-变形测试表明,3枚冯·巴尔螺钉提供了最强的固定,这在极限扭转力矩测试中得到了证实。无论位置如何,即使是2枚冯·巴尔螺钉也比带或不带附加拉力螺钉的滑动加压螺钉更强。结果表明,使用3枚5.5毫米螺钉可获得股骨颈骨折最佳的扭转稳定性。

相似文献

1
Stability of femoral neck osteosynthesis. Comparison of fixation methods in cadavers.股骨颈骨合成的稳定性。尸体中固定方法的比较。
Acta Orthop Scand. 1989 Jun;60(3):299-302. doi: 10.3109/17453678909149281.
2
Stability of femoral neck osteotomies fixed by von Bahr screws or by compression hip screw.
Eur Surg Res. 1984;16 Suppl 2:37-40. doi: 10.1159/000128620.
3
Femoral stiffness after osteosynthesis of a subcapital osteotomy in osteoporotic bone: an in-vitro comparison of nine fixation methods.骨质疏松性骨股骨颈截骨术后骨合成后的股骨刚度:九种固定方法的体外比较
J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(6):464-9. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199509060-00002.
4
Interlocked Pins Increase Strength by a Lateral Spread of Load in Femoral Neck Fixation: a Cadaver Study.交错钉增加股骨颈固定中负荷的侧向分布强度:尸体研究。
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(2):144-152.
5
Strength of femoral neck fracture fixation. Comparison of six techniques in cadavers.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1987 Dec;58(6):634-7. doi: 10.3109/17453678709146502.
6
In vitro femoral stiffness after femoral neck osteotomy and osteosynthesis with defined surgical errors.
J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(6):416-20. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199608000-00009.
7
Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.垂直型股骨颈骨折:四种固定技术的力学分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Sep;21(8):544-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31814b822e.
8
[Study of osteosynthesis strength in femoral neck fractures stabilized with a Zespol hip fixator].[使用Zespol髋关节固定器稳定股骨颈骨折的骨合成强度研究]
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 1994;59(6):507-14.
9
Does a trochanteric lag screw improve fixation of vertically oriented femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical analysis in cadaveric bone.股骨转子间拉力螺钉能否改善垂直型股骨颈骨折的固定效果?一项尸体骨生物力学分析。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013 Oct;28(8):886-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
10
Increased stability by a novel femoral neck interlocking plate compared to conventional fixation methods. A biomechanical study in synthetic bone.新型股骨颈锁定钢板固定较传统固定方法更稳定:一项合成骨的生物力学研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Jun;76:104995. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.104995. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures-A Surgical Management Algorithm.囊内股骨颈骨折-手术治疗算法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 31;57(8):791. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080791.
2
Are two screws enough for fixation of femoral neck fractures? A case series and review of the literature.两颗螺钉用于股骨颈骨折固定是否足够?病例系列及文献综述。
Open Orthop J. 2007 Nov 8;1:4-8. doi: 10.2174/1874325000701010004.