Simental-Mendía Mario, Vílchez-Cavazos José F, Peña-Martínez Víctor M, Said-Fernández Salvador, Lara-Arias Jorge, Martínez-Rodríguez Herminia Guadalupe
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Nuevo León (UANL), Ave Francisco I. Madero and Eduardo Aguirre Pequeño S/N, Colonia Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, NL, México.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital, UANL, Monterrey, NL, México.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Dec;136(12):1723-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2545-2. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative and progressive articular cartilage disease. Infiltration of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative due to the content of biologically active cytokines in PRP. We aimed to compare the clinical response of acetaminophen and intra-articular leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) in early knee OA.
A total of 65 patients with clinically and radiographically documented knee OA (grade 1-2) were analyzed. Patients were randomized into two groups: 32 were treated with acetaminophen (500 mg/8 h) over 6 weeks, and 33 received three intra-articular injections of autologous LP-PRP (once every 2 weeks). All patients were evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, and the SF-12 health survey at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 weeks of follow-up. All LP-PRP preparations were analyzed for the platelet, leukocyte, IL-1ra, and TGF-β concentrations.
The decrease in the VAS pain level in the LP-PRP group was greater than that in the acetaminophen group (p < 0.05). Patients treated with LP-PRP showed a sustained improvement in knee function at week 24 (p < 0.01). The SF-12 results only indicated an improvement in quality-of-life in the LP-PRP group at 6, 12, and 24 weeks of follow-up (p < 0.01). Both IL-1ra and TGF-β were detected in the LP-PRP samples (313.8 ± 231.6 and 21,183.8 ± 8556.3 pg/mL, respectively).
Treatment with LP-PRP injections resulted in a significantly better clinical outcome than did treatment with acetaminophen, with sustained lower EVA and WOMAC scores and improvement in quality-of-life (higher SF-12 score). Therapy with LP-PRP may positively modify the inflammatory joint environment by counteracting IL-1β action.
膝关节骨关节炎(OA)是一种退行性、进行性关节软骨疾病。由于富含血小板血浆(PRP)中含有生物活性细胞因子,因此将其注射入关节已被提议作为一种治疗选择。我们旨在比较对乙酰氨基酚与关节腔内注射贫白细胞PRP(LP-PRP)治疗早期膝关节OA的临床反应。
共分析了65例临床和影像学确诊为膝关节OA(1-2级)的患者。患者被随机分为两组:32例接受对乙酰氨基酚治疗(500mg/8小时),持续6周;33例接受3次关节腔内注射自体LP-PRP(每2周注射1次)。在基线以及随访的6周、12周和24周时,所有患者均通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分以及SF-12健康调查进行评估。对所有LP-PRP制剂进行血小板、白细胞、白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂(IL-1ra)和转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)浓度分析。
LP-PRP组的VAS疼痛水平下降幅度大于对乙酰氨基酚组(p<0.05)。接受LP-PRP治疗的患者在第24周时膝关节功能持续改善(p<0.01)。SF-12结果仅显示LP-PRP组在随访的6周、12周和24周时生活质量有所改善(p<0.01)。在LP-PRP样本中检测到了IL-1ra和TGF-β(分别为313.8±231.6和21,183.8±8556.3pg/mL)。
与对乙酰氨基酚治疗相比,注射LP-PRP治疗产生了显著更好的临床结果,EVA和WOMAC评分持续更低,生活质量得到改善(SF-12评分更高)。LP-PRP治疗可能通过对抗IL-1β的作用对炎症性关节环境产生积极影响。