Van Onsem Stefaan, Van Der Straeten Catherine, Arnout Nele, Deprez Patrick, Van Damme Geert, Victor Jan
Department of Physical Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Physical Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Translational Musculoskeletal Sciences and Technology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2660-2667.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a proven and cost-effective treatment for osteoarthritis. Despite the good to excellent long-term results, some patients remain dissatisfied. Our study aimed at establishing a predictive model to aid patient selection and decision-making in TKA.
Using data from our prospective arthroplasty outcome database, 113 patients were included. Preoperatively and postoperatively, the patients completed 107 questions in 5 questionnaires: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Knee Score, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Euroqol questionnaire, and Knee Scoring System. First, outcome parameters were compared between the satisfied and dissatisfied group. Second, we developed a new prediction tool using regression analysis. Each outcome score was analyzed with simple regression. Subsequently, the predictive weight of individual questions was evaluated applying multiple linear regression. Finally, 10 questions were retained to construct a new prediction tool.
Overall satisfaction rate in this study was found to be 88%. We identified a significant difference between the satisfied and dissatisfied group when looking at the preoperative questionnaires. Dissatisfied patients had more preoperative symptoms (such as stiffness), less pain, and a lower quality of life. They were more likely to ruminate and had a lower preoperative Knee Scoring System satisfaction score. The developed prediction tool consists of 10 simple but robust questions. Sensitivity was 97% with a positive-predictive value of 93%.
Based upon preoperative parameters, we were able to partially predict satisfaction and dissatisfaction after TKA. After further validation, this new prediction tool for patient satisfaction following TKA may allow surgeons and patients to evaluate the risks and benefits of surgery on an individual basis and help in patient selection.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗骨关节炎的一种成熟且具有成本效益的方法。尽管长期效果良好至极佳,但仍有一些患者不满意。我们的研究旨在建立一个预测模型,以辅助TKA患者的选择和决策。
使用我们前瞻性关节置换术结果数据库中的数据,纳入了113例患者。术前和术后,患者完成了5份问卷中的107个问题:膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分、牛津膝关节评分、疼痛灾难化量表、欧洲生活质量调查问卷和膝关节评分系统。首先,比较满意组和不满意组的结果参数。其次,我们使用回归分析开发了一种新的预测工具。对每个结果评分进行简单回归分析。随后,应用多元线性回归评估各个问题的预测权重。最后,保留10个问题以构建一个新的预测工具。
本研究的总体满意度为88%。在查看术前问卷时,我们发现满意组和不满意组之间存在显著差异。不满意的患者术前症状更多(如僵硬)、疼痛更少且生活质量更低。他们更容易反复思考,术前膝关节评分系统的满意度得分更低。所开发的预测工具由10个简单但可靠的问题组成。敏感性为97%,阳性预测值为93%。
基于术前参数,我们能够部分预测TKA术后的满意和不满意情况。经过进一步验证,这种用于TKA患者满意度的新预测工具可能使外科医生和患者能够根据个体情况评估手术的风险和益处,并有助于患者选择。