Henderson Meredith C, Hollingsworth Alan B, Gordon Kelly, Silver Michael, Mulpuri Rao, Letsios Elias, Reese David E
Provista Diagnostics, Inc., 55 Broad Street, 18th floor, New York, NY, United States of America, 10004.
Mercy Women's Center-Oklahoma City, 4300 McAuley Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America, 73120-8302.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 10;11(8):e0157692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157692. eCollection 2016.
Despite significant advances in breast imaging, the ability to accurately detect Breast Cancer (BC) remains a challenge. With the discovery of key biomarkers and protein signatures for BC, proteomic technologies are currently poised to serve as an ideal diagnostic adjunct to imaging. Research studies have shown that breast tumors are associated with systemic changes in levels of both serum protein biomarkers (SPB) and tumor associated autoantibodies (TAAb). However, the independent contribution of SPB and TAAb expression data for identifying BC relative to a combinatorial SPB and TAAb approach has not been fully investigated. This study evaluates these contributions using a retrospective cohort of pre-biopsy serum samples with known clinical outcomes collected from a single site, thus minimizing potential site-to-site variation and enabling direct assessment of SPB and TAAb contributions to identify BC. All serum samples (n = 210) were collected prior to biopsy. These specimens were obtained from 18 participants with no evidence of breast disease (ND), 92 participants diagnosed with Benign Breast Disease (BBD) and 100 participants diagnosed with BC, including DCIS. All BBD and BC diagnoses were based on pathology results from biopsy. Statistical models were developed to differentiate BC from non-BC (i.e., BBD and ND) using expression data from SPB alone, TAAb alone, and a combination of SPB and TAAb. When SPB data was independently used for modeling, clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC were 74.7% and 77.0%, respectively. When TAAb data was independently used, clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC were 72.2% and 70.8%, respectively. When modeling integrated data from both SPB and TAAb, the clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of BC improved to 81.0% and 78.8%, respectively. These data demonstrate the benefit of the integration of SPB and TAAb data and strongly support the further development of combinatorial proteomic approaches for detecting BC.
尽管乳腺成像技术取得了重大进展,但准确检测乳腺癌(BC)的能力仍然是一项挑战。随着乳腺癌关键生物标志物和蛋白质特征的发现,蛋白质组学技术目前有望成为成像的理想诊断辅助手段。研究表明,乳腺肿瘤与血清蛋白质生物标志物(SPB)和肿瘤相关自身抗体(TAAb)水平的全身变化有关。然而,相对于组合的SPB和TAAb方法,SPB和TAAb表达数据在识别BC方面的独立贡献尚未得到充分研究。本研究使用从单一地点收集的具有已知临床结果的活检前血清样本的回顾性队列来评估这些贡献,从而最大限度地减少潜在的地点间差异,并能够直接评估SPB和TAAb对识别BC的贡献。所有血清样本(n = 210)均在活检前采集。这些标本来自18名无乳腺疾病(ND)证据的参与者、92名被诊断为良性乳腺疾病(BBD)的参与者和100名被诊断为BC(包括导管原位癌)的参与者。所有BBD和BC诊断均基于活检的病理结果。开发了统计模型,分别使用单独的SPB、单独的TAAb以及SPB和TAAb的组合的表达数据来区分BC与非BC(即BBD和ND)。当单独使用SPB数据进行建模时,检测BC的临床敏感性和特异性分别为74.7%和77.0%。当单独使用TAAb数据时,检测BC的临床敏感性和特异性分别为72.2%和70.8%。当对来自SPB和TAAb的综合数据进行建模时,检测BC的临床敏感性和特异性分别提高到81.0%和78.8%。这些数据证明了整合SPB和TAAb数据的益处,并有力地支持了用于检测BC的组合蛋白质组学方法的进一步开发。