• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

握力与利手:挑战10%规则

Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule.

作者信息

Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Elizabethtown College, Pennsylvania 17022-2298.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 1989 Jul;43(7):444-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.43.7.444.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.43.7.444
PMID:2750859
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the utility of the 10% rule in hand rehabilitation. The 10% rule states that the dominant hand possesses a 10% greater grip strength than the nondominant hand. This rule has been used for many years to assist therapists in setting strength goals for patients with injured hands. The sample for this study consisted of 310 male and female students, faculty, and staff from a small, private liberal arts college located in Pennsylvania. Grip strength was measured with a factory-calibrated Jamar dynamometer. Results showed an overall 10.74% grip strength difference between dominant and nondominant hands. This finding verified the 10% rule. However, when the data were separated into left-handed and right-handed subjects, a 12.72% difference for right-handed subjects and a -0.08% difference for left-handed subjects was found. In conclusion, this study showed that the 10% rule is valid for right-handed persons only; for left-handed persons, grip strength should be considered equivalent in both hands.

摘要

本研究的目的是测试10%规则在手部康复中的效用。10%规则指出,优势手的握力比非优势手大10%。多年来,这条规则一直被用于帮助治疗师为手部受伤的患者设定力量目标。本研究的样本包括来自宾夕法尼亚州一所小型私立文理学院的310名男女学生、教师和工作人员。使用工厂校准的Jamar握力计测量握力。结果显示,优势手和非优势手之间的握力总体差异为10.74%。这一发现证实了10%规则。然而,当数据分为左撇子和右撇子受试者时,右撇子受试者的差异为12.72%,左撇子受试者的差异为-0.08%。总之,本研究表明,10%规则仅适用于右撇子;对于左撇子,双手的握力应被视为相等。

相似文献

1
Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule.握力与利手:挑战10%规则
Am J Occup Ther. 1989 Jul;43(7):444-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.43.7.444.
2
Grip strength: effect of hand dominance.握力:利手的影响。
Singapore Med J. 2002 May;43(5):234-7.
3
Hand strength: normative values.握力:正常值。
J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Jul;19(4):665-70. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90280-1.
4
Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength,dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right-and left-handed subjects.比较右利手和左利手受试者优势手与非优势手的压痛阈值、握力、灵巧性和触觉压力,包括组内和组间比较。
J Korean Med Sci. 2004 Dec;19(6):874-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.6.874.
5
The 10% rule: grip strength and hand dominance in a factory population.10%规则:工厂人群中的握力与利手情况
Work. 1997;8(1):83-91. doi: 10.3233/WOR-1997-8110.
6
Force distribution of a cylindrical grip differs between dominant and nondominant hand in healthy subjects.健康受试者中,圆柱形握把的力分布在优势手和非优势手之间存在差异。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Sep;138(9):1323-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2997-7. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
7
The effect of handedness on grip strength in older adults with intellectual disabilities.惯用手对智力障碍老年人群握力的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 May;34(5):1623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
8
Reliability and validity of the BTE-Primus grip tool.BTE-Primus握力工具的可靠性和有效性。
J Hand Ther. 2003 Jan-Mar;16(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80022-4.
9
Measuring normal hand dexterity values in normal 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children and their relationship with grip and pinch strength.测量3岁、4岁和5岁正常儿童的正常手部灵巧度值及其与握力和捏力的关系。
J Hand Ther. 2003 Jan-Mar;16(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80020-0.
10
Hand dominance effect on median and ulnar sensory evoked amplitude and latency in asymptomatic workers.手部优势对无症状工作者正中神经和尺神经感觉诱发电位幅度及潜伏期的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May;77(5):473-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90036-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting refractoriness in lateral epicondylitis using initial grip strength and quickdash: a retrospective cohort study.利用初始握力和快速短跑预测肱骨外上髁炎的难治性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08902-7.
2
Comparing the clinical outcomes of an innovative bi-frame external fixation device compared to those of volar locking plate and external fixator device among patients with unstable distal radius fractures: a two-year retrospective comparative cohort study.比较创新双框架外固定装置与掌侧锁定钢板及外固定器装置在桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者中的临床疗效:一项为期两年的回顾性比较队列研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2524090. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2524090. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
3
Dupuytren's Disease Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy: Does Grip Strength Improve Post Procedure?掌腱膜挛缩症的经皮针状腱膜切开术:术后握力会改善吗?
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4171. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124171.
4
Experiences of occupational therapy clinicians on the assessment and evaluation of adult handgrip strength.职业治疗临床医生对成人握力评估的经验。
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Mar;86(3):188-196. doi: 10.1177/03080226221135375. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Establishing normative pinch and grip strengths across adult age groups in Singapore.确定新加坡各成年年龄组的标准捏力和握力。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 14;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01140-3.
6
Association of physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, grip strength, and grip strength asymmetry with incident musculoskeletal disorders in 406,080 White adults.406,080名白人成年人的身体活动、心肺适能、握力及握力不对称与新发肌肉骨骼疾病的关联
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 Apr 8;14:101040. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101040.
7
Computer vision and tactile glove: A multimodal model in lifting task risk assessment.计算机视觉与触觉手套:提升任务风险评估中的多模态模型。
Appl Ergon. 2025 Sep;127:104513. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104513. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
8
Tactile Gloves Predict Load Weight During Lifting With Deep Neural Networks.触觉手套利用深度神经网络预测举重时的负载重量。
IEEE Sens J. 2023 Jun;23(16):18798-18809. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2023.3289670.
9
Relationship between hand grip and pinch strength, body composition, pain threshold, and anxiety in dentists.牙医的握力与捏力、身体成分、疼痛阈值及焦虑之间的关系
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03941-4.
10
Reliability of Hip and Shoulder Measurements Assessed via Telehealth Versus a Standard In-Person Visit Modality.通过远程医疗与标准面对面就诊方式评估髋关节和肩关节测量的可靠性。
Perm J. 2025 Jun 16;29(2):12-20. doi: 10.7812/TPP/24.167. Epub 2025 Mar 13.