Suppr超能文献

牧场的生态系统结构、功能和组成受到牲畜放牧的负面影响。

Ecosystem structure, function, and composition in rangelands are negatively affected by livestock grazing.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2016 Jun;26(4):1273-83. doi: 10.1890/15-1234.

Abstract

Reports of positive or neutral effects of grazing on plant species richness have prompted calls for livestock grazing to be used as a tool for managing land for conservation. Grazing effects, however, are likely to vary among different response variables, types, and intensity of grazing, and across abiotic conditions. We aimed to examine how grazing affects ecosystem structure, function, and composition. We compiled a database of 7615 records reporting an effect of grazing by sheep and cattle on 278 biotic and abiotic response variables for published studies across Australia. Using these data, we derived three ecosystem measures based on structure, function, and composition, which were compared against six contrasts of grazing pressure, ranging from low to heavy, two different herbivores (sheep, cattle), and across three different climatic zones. Grazing reduced structure (by 35%), function (24%), and composition (10%). Structure and function (but not composition) declined more when grazed by sheep and cattle together than sheep alone. Grazing reduced plant biomass (40%), animal richness (15%), and plant and animal abundance, and plant and litter cover (25%), but had no effect on plant richness nor soil function. The negative effects of grazing on plant biomass, plant cover, and soil function were more pronounced in drier environments. Grazing effects on plant and animal richness and composition were constant, or even declined, with increasing aridity. Our study represents a comprehensive continental assessment of the implications of grazing for managing Australian rangelands. Grazing effects were largely negative, even at very low levels of grazing. Overall, our results suggest that livestock grazing in Australia is unlikely to produce positive outcomes for ecosystem structure, function, and composition or even as a blanket conservation tool unless reduction in specific response variables is an explicit management objective.

摘要

有关放牧对植物物种丰富度产生积极或中性影响的报告,促使人们呼吁将牲畜放牧作为管理土地以进行保护的一种手段。然而,放牧的影响可能因不同的响应变量、放牧的类型和强度以及不同的非生物条件而有所不同。我们旨在研究放牧如何影响生态系统的结构、功能和组成。我们编制了一个数据库,其中包含 7615 条记录,这些记录报告了澳大利亚各地发表的研究中,绵羊和牛放牧对 278 个生物和非生物响应变量的影响。利用这些数据,我们基于结构、功能和组成得出了三个生态系统指标,并将其与六种放牧压力对比进行了比较,范围从低到高,两种不同的食草动物(绵羊、牛),以及三个不同的气候带。放牧减少了结构(35%)、功能(24%)和组成(10%)。当绵羊和牛一起放牧时,结构和功能(但不是组成)的下降幅度大于单独放牧绵羊时。放牧减少了植物生物量(40%)、动物丰富度(15%)和植物与动物的丰度以及植物和凋落物的覆盖度(25%),但对植物丰富度或土壤功能没有影响。在较干燥的环境中,放牧对植物生物量、植物覆盖和土壤功能的负面影响更为明显。放牧对植物和动物丰富度和组成的影响在干旱程度增加时保持不变,甚至下降。本研究代表了对放牧对管理澳大利亚牧场的影响的全面大陆评估。放牧的影响大多是负面的,即使在非常低的放牧水平下也是如此。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,除非减少特定的响应变量是明确的管理目标,否则澳大利亚的牲畜放牧不太可能对生态系统的结构、功能和组成产生积极影响,甚至不能作为一种通用的保护工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验