Suppr超能文献

多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图对冠状动脉疾病评估的分层分析

Layer-specific analysis of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Park Jae Hun, Woo Jong Shin, Ju Shin, Jung Su Woong, Lee Insoo, Kim Jin Bae, Kim Soo Joong, Kim Weon, Kim Woo-Shik, Kim Kwon Sam

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Kangwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(32):e4549. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004549.

Abstract

Although dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a well-defined tool for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), false-negative and false-positive results still occur. This study investigated the diagnostic role of layer-specific analysis using 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) during DSE.A total of 121 patients who underwent DSE and showed normal wall motion and ejection fraction during baseline echocardiography were enrolled. All patients underwent coronary angiography after DSE within 2 weeks. The patients were divided into the following 4 groups according to DSE results and CAD status: negative DSE with no significant CAD (n = 73), positive DSE with significant CAD (n = 16), negative DSE with significant CAD (n = 17), and positive DSE with no significant CAD (n = 15). Layer-specific global longitudinal strain (GLS) was assessed in the endocardium, mid-myocardium, and epicardium by STE techniques.Patients with significant CAD were older, more male and showed higher glucose level compared to patients without CAD. But coronary risk factors and previous medications were not different between patients with and without CAD. There were no significant differences in whole myocardium or layer-specific GLS found in the baseline echocardiography. During recovery echocardiography, endocardial GLS was significantly different between patients with and without CAD, regardless of the DSE results. A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that endocardial GLS (>-16%) was superior for identifying significant CAD during the DSE recovery stage. Diagnostic accuracy was improved by applying the results of endocardial GLS compared with visual estimation of DSE.The assessment of layer-specific strain by STE during DSE was feasible, and the evaluation of poststress endocardial function is a more sensitive tool for the detection of CAD.

摘要

虽然多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)是诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的一种明确工具,但仍会出现假阴性和假阳性结果。本研究调查了在DSE期间使用二维斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)进行层特异性分析的诊断作用。

共有121例接受DSE且在基线超声心动图检查时壁运动和射血分数正常的患者入组。所有患者在DSE后2周内接受冠状动脉造影。根据DSE结果和CAD状态将患者分为以下4组:DSE阴性且无显著CAD(n = 73)、DSE阳性且有显著CAD(n = 16)、DSE阴性且有显著CAD(n = 17)、DSE阳性且无显著CAD(n = 15)。通过STE技术评估心内膜、心肌中层和心外膜的层特异性整体纵向应变(GLS)。

与无CAD的患者相比,有显著CAD的患者年龄更大,男性更多,血糖水平更高。但有CAD和无CAD的患者之间冠状动脉危险因素和既往用药情况无差异。在基线超声心动图检查中,全心肌或层特异性GLS未发现显著差异。在恢复阶段超声心动图检查期间,无论DSE结果如何,有CAD和无CAD的患者心内膜GLS均有显著差异。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,心内膜GLS(>-16%)在识别DSE恢复阶段的显著CAD方面更具优势。与DSE的视觉评估相比,应用心内膜GLS结果可提高诊断准确性。

在DSE期间通过STE评估层特异性应变是可行的,应激后心内膜功能评估是检测CAD的更敏感工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/528b/4985334/3ff264b2ddf3/medi-95-e4549-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验