Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死患者心肌存活性的评估:二维斑点追踪超声心动图的分层分析

Evaluation of myocardial viability in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Layer-specific analysis of 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.

作者信息

Liu Kun, Wang Yan, Hao Qiongyu, Li Gonghao, Chen Peng, Li Dongye

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221002, Jiangsu Province.

Department of Cardiology, the Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e13959. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013959.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of layer-specific two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (LS2D-STE) for evaluating viable myocardium (VM) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was unclear, this study provides new insights into it and to make a comparison with dualisotope simultaneous acquisition single photon emission computed tomography ( DISA-SPECT).

METHODS

Forty hospitalized patients with AMI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) underwent LS2D-STE and DISA-SPECT before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The longitudinal, circumferential, and radial peak systolic strains and the peak systolic strain rates of 3 myocardiallayers (endocardium, mid-myocardium, and epicardium), as well as the total wall thickness, were determined by LS2D-STE. Routine echocardiography was followedup at 1, 3, 6 months after PCI, with the improvement of the wall motion as the goldenstandard for evaluating VM.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of DISA-SPECT for evaluating VM were 82.1%, 74.3%, and 79.3%, respectively. Among the layer-specific parameters, only endocardial (endo-) longitudinal strain (LS) and endo- longitudinal strain rate (LSr) were used as independent parameters for evaluating VM (P < .05), and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of endo-LS and endo-LSr in evaluation of VM were 77.1%, 65.4%, and 72.9% vs 72.9%, 65.4%, and 69.7%. Endo-LS and endo-LSr were superior to total wall thickness LS and LSr (AUC endo-LS 0.767 vs total-LS 0.669; endo-LSr 0.743 vs total-LSr 0.682). The parallel test and the serial test of combination of endo-LS and endo-LSr showed similar sensitivity, specificity and accuracy to DISA-SPECT (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The endo-LS and endo-LSr analysis of LS2D-STE can evaluate the VM well, and its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in detection of VM are similar to those of DISA-SPECT, resulting in LS2D-STE being a good option for the assessment of VM.

摘要

背景

二维斑点追踪超声心动图分层分析(LS2D-STE)评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者存活心肌(VM)的价值尚不明确,本研究对此进行了新的探讨,并与双核素同步采集单光子发射计算机断层扫描(DISA-SPECT)进行比较。

方法

40例住院的AMI伴左心室收缩功能障碍(左心室射血分数<50%)患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)前行LS2D-STE和DISA-SPECT检查。通过LS2D-STE测定3层心肌(心内膜、心肌中层和心外膜)的纵向、圆周和径向收缩期峰值应变及收缩期峰值应变率,以及总室壁厚度。PCI术后1、3、6个月进行常规超声心动图随访,以室壁运动改善作为评估VM的金标准。

结果

DISA-SPECT评估VM的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为82.1%、74.3%和79.3%。在分层参数中,仅心内膜纵向应变(endo-LS)和心内膜纵向应变率(endo-LSr)可作为评估VM的独立参数(P<0.05),endo-LS和endo-LSr评估VM的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为77.1%、65.4%和72.9%,而72.9%、65.4%和69.7%。Endo-LS和endo-LSr优于总室壁厚度应变及应变率(AUC endo-LS 0.767对total-LS 0.669;endo-LSr 0.743对total-LSr 0.682)。Endo-LS和endo-LSr联合的平行试验和系列试验显示出与DISA-SPECT相似的敏感性、特异性和准确性(P>0.05)。

结论

LS2D-STE的endo-LS和endo-LSr分析可较好地评估VM,其检测VM的敏感性、特异性和准确性与DISA-SPECT相似,因此LS2D-STE是评估VM的一个良好选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验