Gelcich Stefan, Vargas Camila, Carreras Maria Jose, Castilla Juan Carlos, Donlan C Josh
Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES) and Centro de Conservacion Marina Departamento de Ecologia, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Advanced Conservation Strategies, Cordoba, Spain.
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(2):184-189. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0810-9. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Biodiversity offsets are becoming increasingly common across a portfolio of settings: national policy, voluntary programs, international lending, and corporate business structures. Given the diversity of ecological, political, and socio-economic systems where offsets may be applied, place-based information is likely to be most useful in designing and implementing offset programs, along with guiding principles that assure best practice. We reviewed the research on biodiversity offsets to explore gaps and needs. While the peer-reviewed literature on offsets is growing rapidly, it is heavily dominated by ecological theory, wetland ecosystems, and U.S.-based research. Given that majority of offset policies and programs are occurring in middle- and low-income countries, the research gaps we identified present a number of risks. They also present an opportunity to create regionally based learning platforms focused on pilot projects and institutional capacity building. Scientific research should diversify, both topically and geographically, in order to support the successful design, implementation, and monitoring of biodiversity offset programs.
国家政策、自愿性项目、国际贷款以及企业商业结构。鉴于补偿措施可能适用的生态、政治和社会经济系统的多样性,基于地点的信息以及确保最佳实践的指导原则,在设计和实施补偿项目时可能最为有用。我们回顾了关于生物多样性补偿的研究,以探索其中的差距和需求。虽然关于补偿的同行评议文献增长迅速,但它在很大程度上由生态理论、湿地生态系统和美国的研究主导。鉴于大多数补偿政策和项目都在中低收入国家实施,我们发现的研究差距存在诸多风险。它们也提供了一个机会,来创建专注于试点项目和机构能力建设的区域学习平台。科学研究应在主题和地域上实现多样化,以支持生物多样性补偿项目的成功设计、实施和监测。