Jones Rebecca C, Nicolle Dean, Steane Dorothy A, Vaillancourt René E, Potts Brad M
School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Currency Creek Arboretum, PO Box 808, Melrose Park, South Australia 5039, Australia.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Dec;105:63-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
We used genome-wide markers and an unprecedented scale of sampling to construct a phylogeny for a globally significant Eucalyptus lineage that has been impacted by hybridisation, recent radiation and morphological convergence. Our approach, using 3109 DArT markers distributed throughout the genome and 540 samples covering 185 terminal taxa in sections Maidenaria, Exsertaria, Latoangulatae and related smaller sections, with multiple geographically widespread samples per terminal taxon, produced a phylogeny that largely matched the morphological treatment of sections, though sections Exsertaria and Latoangulatae were polyphyletic. At lower levels there were numerous inconsistencies between the morphological treatment and the molecular phylogeny, and taxa within the three main sections were generally not monophyletic at the series (at least 62% polyphyly) or species (at least 52% polyphyly) level. Some of the discrepancies appear to be the result of morphological convergence or misclassifications, and we propose some taxonomic reassessments to address this. However, many inconsistencies appear to be the products of incomplete speciation and/or hybridisation. Our analysis represents a significant advance on previous phylogenies of these important eucalypt sections (which have mainly used single samples to represent each species), thus providing a robust phylogenetic framework for evolutionary and ecological studies.
我们使用全基因组标记和前所未有的采样规模,为一个具有全球重要性、受到杂交、近期辐射和形态趋同影响的桉属谱系构建了系统发育树。我们的方法是,利用分布在整个基因组中的3109个DArT标记以及覆盖 Maidenaria、Exsertaria、Latoangulatae 组和相关较小组中185个终端分类群的540个样本,每个终端分类群有多个广泛分布于不同地理位置的样本,构建出的系统发育树在很大程度上与各组的形态学分类相匹配,不过Exsertaria组和Latoangulatae组是多系的。在较低分类水平上,形态学分类与分子系统发育之间存在许多不一致之处,三个主要组内的分类群在系(至少62%为多系)或种(至少52%为多系)水平上通常不是单系的。一些差异似乎是形态趋同或错误分类的结果,我们提出了一些分类学重新评估建议来解决这一问题。然而,许多不一致之处似乎是不完全物种形成和/或杂交的产物。我们的分析相较于这些重要桉属组之前的系统发育研究(主要使用单个样本代表每个物种)有了显著进展,从而为进化和生态研究提供了一个可靠的系统发育框架。