Kent Jeffery D, Holt Robert J, Jung Donald, Tidmarsh George F, Grahn Amy Y, Ball Julie, Peura David A
Horizon Pharma, Inc, Deerfield, ILUSA.
University of Illinois-Chicago, ILUSA.
J Drug Assess. 2014 Feb 17;3(1):20-7. doi: 10.3109/21556660.2014.895371. eCollection 2014.
Famotidine given at a dose of 80 mg/day is effective in preventing NSAID-induced gastropathy. The aim of this proof of concept study was to compare twice a day (BID) vs 3-times a day (TID) administration of this total dose of famotidine on intragastric pH in healthy volunteers.
Two analyses were undertaken: (1) a 13 subject controlled cross-over 24-h intragastric pH evaluation of the BID and TID administration of 80 mg/day of famotidine, as well as measures for drug accumulation over 5 days (EudraCT, number 2006-002930-39); and (2) a pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model which predicted steady-state famotidine plasma concentrations and pH of the two regimens.
For the cross-over study, gastric pH was above 3.5 for a mean of 20 min longer for TID dosing compared to BID dosing on Day 1. On Day 5, the mean time above this threshold was higher with the BID regimen by ∼25 min. For pH 4, subjects' gastric pH was above this pH value for a mean of 25 min longer for TID dosing compared to BID dosing on Day 1. For Day 5, the pH was above 4 for ∼45 min longer with the TID regimen as compared with the BID regimen. The mean 24-h gastric pH values when taken in the upright position trended higher for the TID dosing period compared to the BID regimen on Day 1. The steady-state simulation model indicated that, following TID dosing, intragastric pH will be above 3 for 24 h vs 16 h for the BID regimen. There was no evidence for plasma accumulation of famotidine with TID dosing as compared to BID dosing from either analysis.
The data indicate that overall more time is spent above the acidic threshold pH values when 80 mg/day of famotidine is administered TID vs BID. Key limitations included small study size with a short duration and lack of a baseline examination, but was compensated for by the cross-over and PK/PD modeling design. Although most of the comparisons in this proof of concept study were not statistically significant these results have important implications for future research on gastric acid lowering agents used for the prevention of NSAID-induced gastropathy.
法莫替丁以80毫克/天的剂量给药可有效预防非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)引起的胃病。本概念验证研究的目的是比较健康志愿者中,将法莫替丁总剂量分两次每日(BID)给药与分三次每日(TID)给药对胃内pH值的影响。
进行了两项分析:(1)一项有13名受试者参与的对照交叉试验,对每日80毫克法莫替丁的BID和TID给药方案进行24小时胃内pH值评估,以及测量5天内的药物蓄积情况(欧洲临床试验数据库编号2006-002930-39);(2)一个药代动力学(PK)/药效动力学(PD)模型,用于预测两种给药方案的法莫替丁稳态血浆浓度和pH值。
对于交叉试验,在第1天,与BID给药相比,TID给药时胃pH值高于3.5的平均时间长20分钟。在第5天,BID给药方案使胃pH值高于该阈值的平均时间长约25分钟。对于pH值为4的情况,在第1天,与BID给药相比,TID给药时受试者胃pH值高于该pH值的平均时间长25分钟。在第5天,TID给药方案使pH值高于4的时间比BID给药方案长约45分钟。在第1天,站立位时TID给药期间24小时胃pH值的平均值与BID给药方案相比有升高趋势。稳态模拟模型表明,TID给药后,胃内pH值高于3的时间为24小时,而BID给药方案为16小时。两项分析均未发现与BID给药相比,TID给药时法莫替丁有血浆蓄积现象。
数据表明,每日80毫克法莫替丁TID给药与BID给药相比,总体上胃内pH值高于酸性阈值的时间更多。主要局限性包括研究规模小、持续时间短且缺乏基线检查,但交叉试验和PK/PD建模设计弥补了这些不足。尽管本概念验证研究中的大多数比较无统计学意义,但这些结果对未来用于预防NSAID引起的胃病的胃酸降低剂研究具有重要意义。