• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在14天的治疗期间,比较服用20.6毫克奥美拉唑镁(非处方耐信)每日一次、10毫克法莫替丁(胃仙-U)每日两次以及20毫克法莫替丁每日两次后的胃内pH值。

Comparison of gastric pH with omeprazole magnesium 20.6 mg (Prilosec OTC) o.m. famotidine 10 mg (Pepcid AC) b.d. and famotidine 20 mg b.d. over 14 days of treatment.

作者信息

Miner P B, Allgood L D, Grender J M

机构信息

Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jan 1;25(1):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03129.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03129.x
PMID:17229225
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The onset of acid inhibition for proton pump inhibitors is slower than with H2RAs and generally considered to be at a steady-state after 5 days. Thus, little direct comparison data exists between H2RAs and proton pump inhibitors for gastric acid suppression on day 1 of therapy. Furthermore, the durability of their acid suppression has not been systematically compared.

AIM

To compare the effects of 20.6 mg omeprazole magnesium o.m. (Ome-Mg 20), famotidine 10 mg b.d. (Fam 10) and famotidine 20 mg b.d. (Fam 20) on intragastric pH on day 1 and throughout 14 days of dosing.

METHODS

The study was a randomized, double-blind, three-dosing regimens, three-period crossover. Healthy adults with frequent heartburn (> or =2 days/week) underwent 24-h gastric pH monitoring on days 0 (baseline), 1, 3, 7 and 14.

RESULTS

Thirty-one subjects were included in the per-protocol analyses. On day 1, the mean percentage time pH > 4 (pH4%) was higher for Ome-Mg 20, 44.6%, than for Fam 10, 36.7% (P = 0.032), and not different from Fam 20, 46.9% (P = 0.541). The pH4% was higher for Ome-Mg 20 than either famotidine regimen on all subsequent monitoring days (P < 0.001). The 24-h area under the mean intragastric pH curve showed a similar pattern. Furthermore, after day 1, Ome-Mg 20 demonstrated an increasing and sustained effect in contrast to a decreasing effect for famotidine, consistent with H2RA tolerance.

CONCLUSION

Gastric acid suppression on Ome-Mg 20 mg o.m. over 14 days was comparable with Fam 10 mg b.d. or Fam 20 mg b.d. on day 1, and superior thereafter.

摘要

背景

质子泵抑制剂的抑酸起效速度比H2受体拮抗剂慢,一般认为5天后达到稳态。因此,在治疗第1天,H2受体拮抗剂和质子泵抑制剂之间关于胃酸抑制的直接比较数据很少。此外,它们的抑酸持久性尚未得到系统比较。

目的

比较20.6毫克奥美拉唑镁口服(Ome-Mg 20)、法莫替丁10毫克每日两次(Fam 10)和法莫替丁20毫克每日两次(Fam 20)在给药第1天及整个14天给药期间对胃内pH值的影响。

方法

该研究为随机、双盲、三种给药方案、三期交叉试验。有频繁烧心症状(≥每周2天)的健康成年人在第0天(基线)、第1天、第3天、第7天和第14天接受24小时胃pH值监测。

结果

符合方案分析纳入了31名受试者。在第1天,Ome-Mg 20的pH>4的平均时间百分比(pH4%)为44.6%,高于Fam 10的36.7%(P = 0.032),与Fam 20的46.9%无差异(P = 0.541)。在所有后续监测日,Ome-Mg 20的pH4%均高于两种法莫替丁给药方案(P < 0.001)。平均胃内pH曲线下的24小时面积呈现类似模式。此外,在第1天后,Ome-Mg 20表现出持续增强的效果,而法莫替丁则呈现下降效果,这与H2受体拮抗剂的耐受性一致。

结论

14天内服用20毫克奥美拉唑镁口服,在第1天对胃酸的抑制作用与每日两次服用10毫克法莫替丁或每日两次服用20毫克法莫替丁相当,此后则更优。

相似文献

1
Comparison of gastric pH with omeprazole magnesium 20.6 mg (Prilosec OTC) o.m. famotidine 10 mg (Pepcid AC) b.d. and famotidine 20 mg b.d. over 14 days of treatment.在14天的治疗期间,比较服用20.6毫克奥美拉唑镁(非处方耐信)每日一次、10毫克法莫替丁(胃仙-U)每日两次以及20毫克法莫替丁每日两次后的胃内pH值。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jan 1;25(1):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03129.x.
2
Effect of four lansoprazole dose levels and one dosage regimen of omeprazole on 24-hour intragastric pH in healthy subjects.四种兰索拉唑剂量水平及一种奥美拉唑给药方案对健康受试者24小时胃内pH值的影响。
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Sep;17(7):489-95.
3
Persistent acid secretion during omeprazole therapy: a study of gastric acid profiles in patients demonstrating failure of omeprazole therapy.奥美拉唑治疗期间持续性胃酸分泌:对奥美拉唑治疗失败患者胃酸谱的研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Aug;91(8):1527-31.
4
The comparative effects of single intravenous doses of omeprazole and famotidine on intragastric pH.单次静脉注射奥美拉唑和法莫替丁对胃内pH值的比较作用。
J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;39(1):21-5. doi: 10.1007/s00535-003-1240-6.
5
Effect of omeprazole on acid gastroesophageal reflux and gastric acidity in preterm infants with pathological acid reflux.奥美拉唑对病理性酸反流早产儿胃酸反流及胃酸度的影响。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Jan;44(1):41-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000252190.97545.07.
6
Optimal dosing of omeprazole 40 mg daily: effects on gastric and esophageal pH and serum gastrin in healthy controls.每日40毫克奥美拉唑的最佳剂量:对健康对照者胃和食管pH值及血清胃泌素的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Aug;91(8):1532-8.
7
Comparison of the effects of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension, delayed-release lansoprazole capsules and delayed-release esomeprazole capsules on nocturnal gastric acidity after bedtime dosing in patients with night-time GERD symptoms.夜间胃食管反流病(GERD)症状患者睡前给药后,即释型奥美拉唑口服混悬液、缓释型兰索拉唑胶囊和缓释型埃索美拉唑胶囊对夜间胃酸度影响的比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jan 15;25(2):197-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03191.x.
8
Nocturnal recovery of gastric acid secretion with twice-daily dosing of proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂每日两次给药时胃酸分泌的夜间恢复情况。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;93(5):763-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.221_a.x.
9
The effect of rabeprazole alone or in combination with H2 receptor blocker on intragastric pH: a pilot study.雷贝拉唑单独或与H2受体阻滞剂联合使用对胃内pH值的影响:一项初步研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec;15(4):225-8.
10
Four-day continuous gastric pH monitoring following anti-acid secretory drug administration: cross-over test to assess the early effects.抗酸分泌药物给药后连续四天的胃pH监测:评估早期效果的交叉试验。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jan 1;27(1):66-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03545.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Compared to histamine-2 receptor antagonist, proton pump inhibitor induces stronger oral-to-gut microbial transmission and gut microbiome alterations: a randomised controlled trial.与组胺-2 受体拮抗剂相比,质子泵抑制剂可引起更强的口腔到肠道微生物传播和肠道微生物组改变:一项随机对照试验。
Gut. 2024 Jun 6;73(7):1087-1097. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330168.
2
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DW1903 in Patients with Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 study.DW1903 治疗胃炎有效性和安全性的评价:一项随机、双盲、非劣效、多中心、3 期研究。
Gut Liver. 2024 Jan 15;18(1):70-76. doi: 10.5009/gnl220446. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Association between pazopanib exposure and safety in Japanese patients with renal cell carcinoma or soft tissue sarcoma.
帕唑帕尼暴露与日本肾细胞癌或软组织肉瘤患者安全性的关联。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 6;13(1):2099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28688-9.
4
An Open Label, Phase 1, Randomized, Seven-treatment, Seven-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability, pH Effect, Food Effect, and Dose Proportionality of CC-292, a Potent and Orally Available Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor.一项开放标签、I 期、随机、七治疗、七周期、交叉研究,旨在评估 CC-292 的相对生物利用度、pH 效应、食物效应和剂量比例性,CC-292 是一种强效的、口服有效的布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2022 Jul;47(4):579-592. doi: 10.1007/s13318-022-00776-7. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Clinical Guidelines for Drug-Related Peptic Ulcer, 2020 Revised Edition.2020 年修订版药物相关性消化性溃疡临床指南。
Gut Liver. 2020 Nov 15;14(6):707-726. doi: 10.5009/gnl20246.
6
Bottom-Up Physiologically Based Oral Absorption Modeling of Free Weak Base Drugs.游离弱碱性药物基于生理学的自下而上口服吸收建模
Pharmaceutics. 2020 Sep 3;12(9):844. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12090844.
7
Effect of acid-reducing agents on clinical relapse in ulcerative colitis with pH-dependent-released 5-aminosalicylic acid: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.抑酸剂对pH依赖型释放5-氨基水杨酸治疗的溃疡性结肠炎临床复发的影响:日本一项多中心回顾性研究
Intest Res. 2021 Apr;19(2):225-231. doi: 10.5217/ir.2020.00023. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Dyspepsia in Korea.韩国功能性消化不良临床实践指南。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Jan 30;26(1):29-50. doi: 10.5056/jnm19209.
9
Proton pump inhibitors and adverse effects in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂与肾移植受者的不良反应:一项荟萃分析。
World J Transplant. 2019 Jun 28;9(2):35-47. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v9.i2.35.
10
The Safety of Appropriate Use of Over-the-Counter Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evidence-Based Review and Delphi Consensus.非处方质子泵抑制剂合理使用的安全性:基于证据的综述与德尔菲共识
Drugs. 2017 Apr;77(5):547-561. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0712-6.