Suppr超能文献

用于结直肠癌人群筛查的CT结肠成像:来自欧洲试验的启示

CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.

作者信息

Sali Lapo, Regge Daniele

机构信息

1 Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences Mario Serio, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

2 Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2016 Dec;89(1068):20160517. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160517. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

Abstract

CT colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive radiological investigation of the colon. Robust evidence indicates that CTC is safe, well tolerated and highly accurate for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and large polyps, which are the targets of screening. Randomized controlled trials were carried out in Europe to evaluate CTC as the primary test for population screening of CRC in comparison with faecal immunochemical test (FIT), sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. Main outcomes were participation rate and detection rate. Participation rate for screening CTC was in the range of 25-34%, whereas the detection rate of CTC for CRC and advanced adenoma was in the range of 5.1-6.1%. Participation for CTC screening was lower than that for FIT, similar to that for sigmoidoscopy and higher than that for colonoscopy. The detection rate of CTC was higher than that of one FIT round, similar to that of sigmoidoscopy and lower than that of colonoscopy. However, owing to the higher participation rate in CTC screening with respect to colonoscopy screening, the detection rates per invitee of CTC and colonoscopy would be comparable. These results justify consideration of CTC in organized screening programmes for CRC. However, assessment of other factors such as polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral, management of extracolonic findings and, most importantly, the forthcoming results of cost-effectiveness analyses are crucial to define the role of CTC in primary screening.

摘要

CT结肠成像(CTC)是一种对结肠进行的微创放射学检查。有力证据表明,CTC对于检测结直肠癌(CRC)和大息肉(筛查目标)而言是安全的,耐受性良好且准确性高。欧洲开展了随机对照试验,以评估将CTC作为CRC人群筛查的主要检测方法,并与粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、乙状结肠镜检查和结肠镜检查进行比较。主要结果是参与率和检测率。CTC筛查的参与率在25%至34%之间,而CTC对CRC和高级别腺瘤的检测率在5.1%至6.1%之间。CTC筛查的参与率低于FIT,与乙状结肠镜检查相似且高于结肠镜检查。CTC的检测率高于一轮FIT,与乙状结肠镜检查相似且低于结肠镜检查。然而,由于CTC筛查相对于结肠镜检查筛查的参与率更高,因此CTC和结肠镜检查每位受邀者的检测率将具有可比性。这些结果证明在CRC的有组织筛查计划中考虑使用CTC是合理的。然而,评估其他因素,如结肠镜检查转诊的息肉大小阈值、结肠外发现的处理,以及最重要的成本效益分析的即将得出的结果,对于确定CTC在初级筛查中的作用至关重要。

相似文献

1
CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Dec;89(1068):20160517. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160517. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
2
4
5
Does CT colonography have a role for population-based colorectal cancer screening?
Eur Radiol. 2012 Jul;22(7):1495-503. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2449-7. Epub 2012 May 2.
6
Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme.
Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1434-1440. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311278. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
7
The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20150910. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150910. Epub 2016 May 19.

引用本文的文献

2
The role of deep learning in diagnosing colorectal cancer.
Prz Gastroenterol. 2023;18(3):266-273. doi: 10.5114/pg.2023.129494. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
CT colonography: can we achieve an adequate bowel preparation without diet restriction?
Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul;33(7):5184-5192. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09471-w. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
5
Colorectal Cancer Screening with Computed Tomography Colonography: Single Region Experience in Kazakhstan.
Clin Endosc. 2022 Jan;55(1):101-112. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.066. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
6
Computed tomography colonography and radiation risk: How low can we go?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar 16;13(3):72-81. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i3.72.
8
Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5808-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
9
Review of radiological screening programmes for breast, lung and pancreatic malignancy.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018 Jun;8(5):525-534. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.05.06.
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Role of Psychological, Social and Background Factors in Decision-making Process.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018 Mar 21;14:63-69. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010063. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

2
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
3
Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme.
Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1434-1440. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311278. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
4
The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20150910. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150910. Epub 2016 May 19.
5
CT-Colonography vs. Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;111(4):516-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.58. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
6
The global decrease in cancer mortality: trends and disparities.
Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):926-33. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw027. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
9
Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.
Cancer Control. 2015 Apr;22(2):248-58. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200219.
10
Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review.
Gut. 2015 Jul;64(7):1158-77. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308081. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验