Sali Lapo, Regge Daniele
1 Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences Mario Serio, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
2 Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Dec;89(1068):20160517. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160517. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
CT colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive radiological investigation of the colon. Robust evidence indicates that CTC is safe, well tolerated and highly accurate for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and large polyps, which are the targets of screening. Randomized controlled trials were carried out in Europe to evaluate CTC as the primary test for population screening of CRC in comparison with faecal immunochemical test (FIT), sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. Main outcomes were participation rate and detection rate. Participation rate for screening CTC was in the range of 25-34%, whereas the detection rate of CTC for CRC and advanced adenoma was in the range of 5.1-6.1%. Participation for CTC screening was lower than that for FIT, similar to that for sigmoidoscopy and higher than that for colonoscopy. The detection rate of CTC was higher than that of one FIT round, similar to that of sigmoidoscopy and lower than that of colonoscopy. However, owing to the higher participation rate in CTC screening with respect to colonoscopy screening, the detection rates per invitee of CTC and colonoscopy would be comparable. These results justify consideration of CTC in organized screening programmes for CRC. However, assessment of other factors such as polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral, management of extracolonic findings and, most importantly, the forthcoming results of cost-effectiveness analyses are crucial to define the role of CTC in primary screening.
CT结肠成像(CTC)是一种对结肠进行的微创放射学检查。有力证据表明,CTC对于检测结直肠癌(CRC)和大息肉(筛查目标)而言是安全的,耐受性良好且准确性高。欧洲开展了随机对照试验,以评估将CTC作为CRC人群筛查的主要检测方法,并与粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、乙状结肠镜检查和结肠镜检查进行比较。主要结果是参与率和检测率。CTC筛查的参与率在25%至34%之间,而CTC对CRC和高级别腺瘤的检测率在5.1%至6.1%之间。CTC筛查的参与率低于FIT,与乙状结肠镜检查相似且高于结肠镜检查。CTC的检测率高于一轮FIT,与乙状结肠镜检查相似且低于结肠镜检查。然而,由于CTC筛查相对于结肠镜检查筛查的参与率更高,因此CTC和结肠镜检查每位受邀者的检测率将具有可比性。这些结果证明在CRC的有组织筛查计划中考虑使用CTC是合理的。然而,评估其他因素,如结肠镜检查转诊的息肉大小阈值、结肠外发现的处理,以及最重要的成本效益分析的即将得出的结果,对于确定CTC在初级筛查中的作用至关重要。