• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麦克马斯特最佳衰老门户网站证据摘要和博客文章的用户体验:可用性研究。

User Experiences of the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal's Evidence Summaries and Blog Posts: Usability Study.

作者信息

M Barbara Angela, Dobbins Maureen, Haynes R Brian, Iorio Alfonso, Lavis John N, Levinson Anthony J

机构信息

Health Information Research Unit, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Aug 19;3(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6208.

DOI:10.2196/humanfactors.6208
PMID:27542995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5010647/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence summaries and blogs can support evidence-informed healthy aging, by presenting high-quality health research evidence in plain language for a nonprofessional (citizen) audience.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to explore citizens' perceptions about the usability of evidence summaries and blog posts on the Web-based McMaster Optimal Aging Portal.

METHODS

Twenty-two citizens (aged 50 years and older) and informal caregivers participated in a qualitative study using a think-aloud method and semistructured interviews. Eleven interviews were conducted in person, 7 over the telephone, and 4 by Skype.

RESULTS

We identified themes that fell under 4 user-experience categories: (1) desirability: personal relevance, (2) understandability: language comprehension, grasping the message, dealing with uncertainty, (3) usability: volume of information, use of numbers, and (4) usefulness: intention to use, facility for sharing.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants recognized that high-quality evidence on aging was valuable. Their intended use of the information was influenced by how much it applied to their own health circumstances or those of a loved one. Some specific formatting features that were preferred included consistent layout, content organized by subheadings, catchy titles, numerical information summarized in a table, and inclusion of a glossary.

摘要

背景

证据总结和博客通过以通俗易懂的语言向非专业(普通民众)受众呈现高质量的健康研究证据,能够为基于证据的健康老龄化提供支持。

目的

我们的目的是探究民众对基于网络的麦克马斯特最佳老龄化门户网站上证据总结和博客文章可用性的看法。

方法

22名年龄在50岁及以上的民众和非正式照护者参与了一项定性研究,采用出声思考法和半结构化访谈。11次访谈为面对面进行,7次通过电话进行,4次通过Skype进行。

结果

我们确定了属于4个用户体验类别的主题:(1)可取性:个人相关性;(2)可理解性:语言理解、领会信息、应对不确定性;(3)可用性:信息量、数字的使用;(4)有用性:使用意图、分享便利性。

结论

参与者认识到关于老龄化的高质量证据很有价值。他们对信息的预期使用受到信息与自身健康状况或所爱之人健康状况的相关程度的影响。一些更受青睐的具体格式特征包括布局一致、内容按副标题组织、标题吸引人、数字信息以表格形式总结以及包含术语表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d60d/5010647/e98aebe1d9a0/humanfactors_v3i2e22_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d60d/5010647/a2189a963d71/humanfactors_v3i2e22_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d60d/5010647/e98aebe1d9a0/humanfactors_v3i2e22_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d60d/5010647/a2189a963d71/humanfactors_v3i2e22_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d60d/5010647/e98aebe1d9a0/humanfactors_v3i2e22_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
User Experiences of the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal's Evidence Summaries and Blog Posts: Usability Study.麦克马斯特最佳衰老门户网站证据摘要和博客文章的用户体验:可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Aug 19;3(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6208.
2
The McMaster Optimal Aging Portal: Usability Evaluation of a Unique Evidence-Based Health Information Website.麦克马斯特大学最佳衰老门户网站:一个独特的循证健康信息网站的可用性评估。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 May 11;3(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4800.
3
4
Russian translations for Cochrane.考科蓝系统评价协作网的俄语翻译。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S112-3. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150713.
5
McMaster Optimal Aging Portal: an evidence-based database for geriatrics-focused health professionals.麦克马斯特最佳衰老门户网站:面向专注于老年医学的健康专业人员的循证数据库。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 11;10(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2595-8.
6
Women's Perceptions of Usefulness and Ease of Use of Four Healthy Eating Blog Characteristics: A Qualitative Study of 33 French-Canadian Women.女性对四个健康饮食博客特征的有用性和易用性的看法:对 33 名加拿大法语女性的定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jul;118(7):1220-1227.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
7
Evaluation of the Digital Alzheimer Center: Testing Usability and Usefulness of an Online Portal for Patients with Dementia and Their Carers.数字阿尔茨海默病中心评估:测试面向痴呆症患者及其护理人员的在线门户的可用性和实用性。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jul 21;5(3):e144. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5040.
8
"Think aloud" and "Near live" usability testing of two complex clinical decision support tools.两种复杂临床决策支持工具的“大声思考”和“近乎实时”可用性测试。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Oct;106:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
A Weekly, Evidence-Based Health Letter for Caregivers (90Second Caregiver): Usability Study.一份面向护理人员的基于证据的每周健康通讯(90秒护理人员):可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Feb 12;4(2):e14496. doi: 10.2196/14496.
10
Older Cancer Patients' User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study.老年癌症患者对基于网络的健康信息工具的使用体验:一项出声思维研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 25;18(7):e208. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5618.

引用本文的文献

1
Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research.简明语言摘要:理论、指南和实证研究的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 6;17(6):e0268789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268789. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of a Knowledge Translation Intervention on Physical Activity and Mobility in Older Adults (the Move4Age Study): Randomized Controlled Trial.知识转化干预对老年人身体活动和行动能力的影响(Move4Age研究):随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 11;22(2):e15125. doi: 10.2196/15125.
3
Evaluation of an online knowledge translation intervention to promote cancer risk reduction behaviours: findings from a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
The McMaster Optimal Aging Portal: Usability Evaluation of a Unique Evidence-Based Health Information Website.麦克马斯特大学最佳衰老门户网站:一个独特的循证健康信息网站的可用性评估。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 May 11;3(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4800.
2
Development and assessment of a website presenting evidence-based information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project.为多发性硬化症患者提供循证信息的网站的开发与评估:IN-DEEP项目
BMC Neurol. 2016 Mar 2;16:30. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0552-0.
3
Effective presentation of health care performance information for consumer decision making: A systematic review.
评价一种在线知识转化干预措施以促进癌症风险降低行为:一项随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6361-2.
4
A Tool That Assesses the Evidence, Transparency, and Usability of Online Health Information: Development and Reliability Assessment.一种评估在线健康信息的证据、透明度和可用性的工具:开发与可靠性评估
JMIR Aging. 2018 May 7;1(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/aging.9216.
5
A Mobility-Focused Knowledge Translation Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Physical Activity: Process Evaluation of the Move4Age Study.一项以行动能力为重点的知识转化随机对照试验以改善身体活动:Move4Age研究的过程评估
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 20;21(6):e13965. doi: 10.2196/13965.
6
If You Build It, Who Will Come? A Description of User Characteristics and Experiences With the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal.如果你构建了它,谁会来?麦克马斯特最佳衰老门户网站的用户特征与体验描述。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2017 Nov 8;3:2333721417737681. doi: 10.1177/2333721417737681. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
为消费者决策提供有效医疗保健绩效信息:一项系统综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.030. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
4
Developing and refining the methods for a 'one-stop shop' for research evidence about health systems.开发并完善获取卫生系统研究证据的“一站式服务”方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Feb 25;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-10.
5
Patients' perspectives of accessibility and digital delivery of factual content provided by official medical and surgical specialty society websites: a qualitative assessment.患者对官方医学和外科专业学会网站提供的事实性内容的可及性和数字交付的看法:一项定性评估。
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Mar 27;4(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3963.
6
Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over.50岁及以上患者对在线健康信息及与医生沟通的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 13;17(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3588.
7
Baby boomers' adoption of consumer health technologies: survey on readiness and barriers.婴儿潮一代对消费者健康技术的采用:关于准备情况和障碍的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 8;16(9):e200. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3049.
8
Online health information seeking: how people with multiple sclerosis find, assess and integrate treatment information to manage their health.在线健康信息搜索:多发性硬化症患者如何查找、评估和整合治疗信息以管理自身健康。
Health Expect. 2016 Jun;19(3):727-37. doi: 10.1111/hex.12253. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
9
A summary to communicate evidence from systematic reviews to the public improved understanding and accessibility of information: a randomized controlled trial.一项旨在向公众传达系统评价证据的总结,提高了信息的理解和可及性:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape.互联网上患者健康信息的质量:审视复杂且不断演变的局面。
Australas Med J. 2014 Jan 31;7(1):24-8. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2014.1900. eCollection 2014.