Welsh Wayne N, Prendergast Michael, Knight Kevin, Knudsen Hannah, Monico Laura, Gray Julie, Abdel-Salam Sami, Redden Shawna Malvini, Link Nathan, Hamilton Leah, Shafer Michael S, Friedmann Peter D
Temple University.
University of California, Los Angeles.
Crim Justice Behav. 2016 Apr;43(4):483-505. doi: 10.1177/0093854815607306. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
Because weak interagency coordination between community correctional agencies (e.g., probation and parole) and community-based treatment providers has been identified as a major barrier to the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for treating druginvolved offenders, this study sought to examine how key organizational (e.g., leadership, support, staffing) and individual (e.g., burnout, satisfaction) factors influence interagency relationships between these agencies. At each of 20 sites, probation/parole officials ( = 366) and community treatment providers ( = 204) were surveyed about characteristics of their agencies, themselves, and interorganizational relationships with each other. Key organizational and individual correlates of interagency relationships were examined using hierarchical linear models (HLM) analyses, supplemented by interview data. The strongest correlates included Adaptability, Efficacy, and Burnout. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
由于社区矫正机构(如缓刑和假释机构)与社区治疗提供者之间的机构间协调不力已被确定为在治疗涉毒罪犯时采用循证实践(EBPs)的主要障碍,本研究旨在探讨关键的组织因素(如领导力、支持、人员配备)和个人因素(如倦怠、满意度)如何影响这些机构之间的机构间关系。在20个地点,分别对缓刑/假释官员(n = 366)和社区治疗提供者(n = 204)进行了调查,询问了他们所在机构的特征、自身情况以及相互之间的组织间关系。使用分层线性模型(HLM)分析,并辅以访谈数据,研究了机构间关系的关键组织和个人相关因素。最强的相关因素包括适应性、效能感和倦怠。文中还讨论了对政策和实践的启示。