• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓刑官和监督者对实施专业心理健康缓刑的关键资源的看法。

Probation Officers' and Supervisors' Perspectives on Critical Resources for Implementing Specialty Mental Health Probation.

机构信息

University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, USA.

Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 May;48(3):408-419. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01081-8. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-020-01081-8
PMID:32929638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7956054/
Abstract

This paper presents the results of a qualitative study designed to explore and identify the resources that probation officers need to implement specialized mental health probation caseloads, a promising practice that enhances mental health treatment engagement and reduces recidivism among people with mental illnesses. Our research team conducted a directed content analysis guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to analyze qualitative interviews with 16 specialty mental health probation officers and their supervising chiefs. Results indicated five components and resources related to multiple PRISM constructs: (1) meaningfully reduced caseload sizes (intervention design), (2) officers' ability to build rapport and individualize probation (organizational staff characteristics), (3) specialized training that is offered regularly (implementation and sustainability infrastructure), (4) regular case staffing and consultation (implementation and sustainability infrastructure), and (5) communication and collaboration with community-based providers (external environment). Agencies implementing specialized mental health probation approaches should pay particular attention to selecting officers and chiefs and establishing the infrastructure to implement and sustain specialty mental health probation.

摘要

本文介绍了一项定性研究的结果,该研究旨在探索和确定缓刑官实施专门心理健康缓刑案件所需的资源,这是一种有前途的做法,可以提高心理健康治疗的参与度,并降低有精神疾病的人的累犯率。我们的研究团队根据实用、稳健实施和可持续性模型(PRISM)进行了定向内容分析,对 16 名专业心理健康缓刑官及其监督主管进行了定性访谈。结果表明,与多个 PRISM 结构相关的有五个组成部分和资源:(1)有意义地减少案件数量(干预设计),(2)官员建立融洽关系和个性化缓刑的能力(组织人员特征),(3)定期提供的专门培训(实施和可持续性基础设施),(4)定期的案件人员配备和咨询(实施和可持续性基础设施),以及(5)与基于社区的提供者的沟通和协作(外部环境)。实施专门心理健康缓刑方法的机构应特别注意选择官员和主管,并建立实施和维持专业心理健康缓刑的基础设施。

相似文献

1
Probation Officers' and Supervisors' Perspectives on Critical Resources for Implementing Specialty Mental Health Probation.缓刑官和监督者对实施专业心理健康缓刑的关键资源的看法。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 May;48(3):408-419. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01081-8. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
2
Specialty Probation Officers as Street-Level Bureaucrats: Exploring How Discretion Is Perceived and Employed on a Mental Health Caseload.专业缓刑官作为基层官僚:探究在精神健康案件中如何感知和运用酌处权。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2022 May;66(6-7):670-693. doi: 10.1177/0306624X21990783. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
3
Comparing Costs of Traditional and Specialty Probation for People With Serious Mental Illness.比较传统和专门缓刑对严重精神疾病患者的成本。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Aug 1;69(8):896-902. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700498. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Strategies for supervising people with mental illnesses on probation caseloads: results from a nationwide study.监督缓刑案件中患有精神疾病者的策略:一项全国性研究的结果。
Health Justice. 2023 Oct 12;11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40352-023-00241-w.
5
Walking the line: specialized and standard probation officer perspectives on supervising probationers with serious mental illnesses.维持平衡:专业及标准缓刑监督官对监管患有严重精神疾病缓刑犯的看法
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;37(5):473-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
6
Mental health specialized probation caseloads: are they effective?心理健康专门缓刑案件量:它们有效吗?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;37(5):464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.019. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
7
A Randomized Trial of Specialty Mental Health Probation: Measuring Implementation and Effectiveness Outcomes.一项专业心理健康缓刑随机试验:衡量实施情况和有效性结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 May;49(3):415-428. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01172-0. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
8
Implementing evidence-based supported employment within specialty mental health probation: A hybrid type I implementation-effectiveness trial protocol.在精神卫生缓刑中实施基于证据的支持性就业:混合 I 型实施-有效性试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Nov;134:107342. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107342. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
9
Building a therapeutic relationship between probation officers and probationers with serious mental illnesses.在缓刑官和有严重精神疾病的缓刑犯之间建立治疗关系。
CNS Spectr. 2020 Oct;25(5):723-733. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001871. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
How do probation officers assess and manage recidivism and violence risk for probationers with mental disorder? An experimental investigation.缓刑官如何评估和管理有精神障碍的缓刑犯的累犯和暴力风险?一项实验研究。
Law Hum Behav. 2013 Feb;37(1):22-34. doi: 10.1037/h0093991. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using implementation science to enhance specialized mental health supervision: pre-implementation assessment and rapid qualitative methods.运用实施科学加强专业心理健康监督:实施前评估与快速定性方法
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 24;3(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00174-6.
2
Community Supervision Engagement to Examine Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review.社区监督参与对健康结果的影响:一项范围综述
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Sep-Oct;42(5):1746-1760. doi: 10.1111/phn.13577. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
The application of implementation science methods in correctional health intervention research: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Substance Use Services for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth: Complexity of Process Improvement Plans in a Large Scale Multi-site Study.改善少年司法涉案青少年的物质使用服务:大规模多地点研究中过程改进计划的复杂性。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Jul;47(4):501-514. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-01007-z.
2
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to examine implementation determinants of specialty mental health probation.运用实施研究综合框架来审视专科心理健康缓刑的实施决定因素。
Health Justice. 2019 Dec 5;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40352-019-0098-5.
3
Comparison of the Overlap between Juvenile Justice Processing and Behavioral Health Screening, Assessment and Referral.
实施科学方法在惩教健康干预研究中的应用:一项系统综述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 24;4(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00521-4.
4
Strategies for supervising people with mental illnesses on probation caseloads: results from a nationwide study.监督缓刑案件中患有精神疾病者的策略:一项全国性研究的结果。
Health Justice. 2023 Oct 12;11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40352-023-00241-w.
5
Implementing evidence-based supported employment within specialty mental health probation: A hybrid type I implementation-effectiveness trial protocol.在精神卫生缓刑中实施基于证据的支持性就业:混合 I 型实施-有效性试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Nov;134:107342. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107342. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
6
A Randomized Trial of Specialty Mental Health Probation: Measuring Implementation and Effectiveness Outcomes.一项专业心理健康缓刑随机试验:衡量实施情况和有效性结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 May;49(3):415-428. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01172-0. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
青少年司法程序与行为健康筛查、评估及转诊之间重叠情况的比较
J Appl Juv Justice Serv. 2018;2018:97-125.
4
Comparing Public Safety Outcomes for Traditional Probation vs Specialty Mental Health Probation.传统缓刑与专业心理健康缓刑的公共安全结果比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 1;74(9):942-948. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1384.
5
Developing effective interorganizational relationships between community corrections and community treatment providers.在社区矫正机构与社区治疗服务提供者之间建立有效的组织间关系。
J Offender Rehabil. 2016;55(7):484-501. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2016.1218401. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
6
The Juvenile Justice Behavioral Health Services Cascade: A new framework for measuring unmet substance use treatment services needs among adolescent offenders.青少年司法行为健康服务梯级:一种衡量青少年罪犯未满足的物质使用治疗服务需求的新框架。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Mar;74:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
7
CORRELATES OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL SERVICE COORDINATION IN COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS.社区矫正中组织间服务协调的相关因素
Crim Justice Behav. 2016 Apr;43(4):483-505. doi: 10.1177/0093854815607306. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
8
Juvenile Justice-Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS): a cluster randomized trial targeting system-wide improvement in substance use services.青少年司法——针对法律系统中青少年的干预措施的转化研究(JJ-TRIALS):一项旨在全面改善物质使用服务的整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 29;11:57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0423-5.
9
Effects of an Organizational Linkage Intervention on Inter-Organizational Service Coordination Between Probation/Parole Agencies and Community Treatment Providers.组织联系干预对缓刑/假释机构与社区治疗提供者之间组织间服务协调的影响。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Jan;43(1):105-21. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0623-8.
10
Effect of an organizational linkage intervention on staff perceptions of medication-assisted treatment and referral intentions in community corrections.组织联系干预对社区矫正工作人员对药物辅助治疗的认知及转诊意愿的影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Mar;50:50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 14.